Firebird wrote: >norenxaq wrote: > > > >>People might, but it would be incorporated with other lines. >> >> > >There tends not to be so much of an obsession with having "royal >connections" here and for many it's just an interesting aside - like >my own. > > understood. I view it the same >It's a fact that anyone who is descended from a native of England from >200 years ago has Royal blood in their veins. Various monarchs were >not afraid to give certain subjects a share of their blood. > > > indeed >>as for on-line material, it usually shows the rulers, wives, and >>successors only, and thus not be complete esp. with regard to they >>having Welsh ancestry >> >> > >Well, if it isn't online - and there are full ancestries available on >line - there is always the local library. Their having Welsh ancestry >shouldn't make any difference. > > I am unsure if most online tudor sites go beyond Owen in the mid 1400s. anything further back seems to be ignored and perhaps not realised here. That was my point. >Either way, the OP is going to have to do some work. There's unlikely >to be a nice convenient GED available. > > > indeed