Helen, Mike - and Listers in general, I very strongly suspect that this marriage was by Banns... This Family History Online Web Site extract is a "condensed version" of their pre-prepared format, where all the individual lines have been run into one block of text, which causes unnecessary confusion. Those 'hyphens' are *NOT* 'spacings' but instead indicate 'blanks'. It should really be read as: Married at Coughton, WAR Date 4/11/1799 Licence - Groom John CHATTERLEY aged - status Widower residence as entered - attributed Residence - Notes - Bride Mary GIBBS aged - status - residence as entered Tardebigge Attributed Residence Tardebigge Notes - Misc. Info. - This is the 2nd example I've seen in a week - the format being identical - and on checking the other to the Parish Register there was *NO* indication that it was by Licence. Doubtless Family History Online have an Explanatory Section "somewhere" on their site - but it doesn't seem to be easily accessible! A far better thing would be for them to put 'Licence' under the 'Misc Info' section... Gus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Helen Verrall" <hverrall@ihug.co.nz> To: <WARWICK@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 3:34 AM Subject: [WAR] : CHATTERLEY/DIXON Mike Located this marriage on Family History Online Web Site 1. Married at Coughton, WAR Date 4/11/1799 Licence - Groom John CHATTERLEY aged - status Widower residence as entered - attributed Residence - Notes - Bride Mary GIBBS aged - status - residence as entered Tardebigge Attributed Residence Tardebigge Notes - Misc. Info. - So possibly it was Mark who came from Coughton , thre is a John Chatterley in 1851 Census who was born in Alcester , which of course is close by. The marriage was by License possibly a copy would be at Birmingham Archives. Helen NZ -----Original Message----- From: Helen Verrall [mailto:hverrall@ihug.co.nz] Sent: Saturday, 14 July 2007 2:18 p.m. To: 'Mike'; '1. Married at Coughton, WAR Date 4/11/1799 Licence - Groom John CHATTERLEY aged - status Widower residence as entered - attributed Residence - Notes - Bride Mary GIBBS aged - status - residence as entered Tardebigge Attributed Residence Tardebigge Notes - Misc. Info. -WARWICK@rootsweb.com' Subject: RE: [WAR] CHATTERLEY/DIXON Mike This is the only Mark Chatterley I can find before 1849 - ( there are also siblings ) >From British Vital Records Index. CHATTERLEY, Mark Christening Gender: Male Christening Date: 26 May 1839 Recorded in: Leamington, Warwickshire, England Collection: All Saints Father: Edward CHATTERLEY Mother: Eliza Source: FHL Film 1067477 Dates: 1831 - 1861 In 1851 Census there are other CHATTERLEY's either living or born in Bearley. Edward above was born Bearley, so presumably the same gentleman you found. hth Helen Lower Hutt NZ -----Original Message----- From: warwick-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:warwick-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Saturday, 14 July 2007 8:06 a.m. To: WARWICK@rootsweb.com Subject: [WAR] CHATTERLEY/DIXON Hello Again. According to the IGI Mark CHATTERLEY married Amelia DIZON (probably DIXON) in Coughton 29th May 1830. Is anyone able to help me, please, with any information about Mark's ancestors? The IGI has a son also, Mark, born in 1831 and three later siblings. I would like to connect this family back into the CHATTERLEY trees I am researching in the 10 mile area round Spernal. The only Mark CHATTERLEYs I have come across were one born in Leamington in 1849 to a Bearley born Edward CHATTERLEY and his nephew, Mark William born 1856 also in Leamington. TIA. Mike ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WARWICK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WARWICK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message