Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [WAR] Mary GRENDON/TEALL
    2. Gus Tysoe
    3. Hello Jan, Whitley was never a Civil Parish - while Ecclesiastically it was only created in 1965 by the division into 2 parishes of the former Willenhall with Whitley - itself only created in 1958 out of the [Ecc] Parish of Coventry Holy Trinity, but (apparently) following the boundaries of the Civil Township of Willenhall within [Civil] Coventry Holy Trinity. It really *WOULD* have been a Good Idea had our ancestors only thought to use different words for the [nominally-]smallest Administrative Units of the Civil and the State Religion Organisations... There would seem to be quite a high possibility that her parents were non-conformists, which would explain the absence of her baptism from CofE registers. Gus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Ralph" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:43 AM Subject: [WAR] Mary GRENDON/TEALL > Thanks to all those who replied to my query about Mary TEALL nee GRENDON. > > We would be grateful for further help from the List. Just to > clarify-we have found Mary in all censuses. We have, however, not > found her baptism or her earlier family. According to censuses, her > baptism should have been in Whitley WAR about 1804, but we have not > been able to find the PRs for Whitley, since we do not live locally.I > presume these would be in Coventry or Birmingham Archives? We are > interested too in finding a family link to Grendon Hall, which was > presumably nearby in WAR? Family stories, as yet unsubstantiated by > our research, have always indicated a family link to the hall. > > Jan RALPH > Henfield, West Sussex > > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    03/04/2010 06:05:13