Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. [WAR] Kenilworth cemetery question
    2. Carol and Frank
    3. Hi everyone, I'm kind of thinking out loud and looking to see what other people say. I have two Rawlins ancestors buried in the St. Nicholas Churchyard. As we all know surnames were sometimes spelled differently for one person than another; yet were from the same family. My ancestors were in grave 148 (I believe that's what the number in parenthesis means. I haven't picked up this booklet in some time. Then I find a Rowlins, Richelard (sic) son of Richard & Z- (also the wife of Richard buried in (149). Wouldn't that make you feel that these two families are most likely related? Carol

    07/15/2010 04:46:42
    1. Re: [WAR] Kenilworth cemetery question
    2. Bill Churchill
    3. With their plots being side by side they being relatives or close friends is always a possibility. What is the time period? Bill Churchill ******************* -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carol and Frank Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:47 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [WAR] Kenilworth cemetery question Hi everyone, I'm kind of thinking out loud and looking to see what other people say. I have two Rawlins ancestors buried in the St. Nicholas Churchyard. As we all know surnames were sometimes spelled differently for one person than another; yet were from the same family. My ancestors were in grave 148 (I believe that's what the number in parenthesis means. I haven't picked up this booklet in some time. Then I find a Rowlins, Richelard (sic) son of Richard & Z- (also the wife of Richard buried in (149). Wouldn't that make you feel that these two families are most likely related? Carol List archives are at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/15/2010 05:44:12