Hi Penny, Yes i did,that's how we found him joining the Navy in 1859...Problem is,that's all they have on him.... Thanks Kaz ----- Original Message ----- From: "Penny Courtney" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 9:23 PM Subject: Re: [WAR] Problem with my Vannishing Lalor's Royal Naval records are available from Kew, many of them on line (index free, full record £3.50). Search on his name. Kew also has a guide to searching naval records available on line. Penny in Hampshire UK -------------------------------------------------- From: "kaz" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:25 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: [WAR] Problem with my Vannishing Lalor's > Hi All >>From a very very hot & sweltering 50+ in Poland!! > I am new to the list..................... > My relation Walter Lalor born Aston 1843,his parents were Eliza Simmons & > Michael Lalor,on Walter's birth cert it states Eliza was married to > Michael,but there is no trace of a marriage & Michael's occupation was a > policeman...........On the birth cert,the address of where Walter was born > is not very clear,it is James's ?????? The informant is not clear > either,Mary[unreadable surname] living at James's ???? & who she was is > also not clear enough to read,perhaps it was a home for unmarried mothers? > Before Walter was born Michael had a son Henry Lalor born in 1842,on > Henry's birth cert it shows Henry's mother,Hannah Malin who was not > married to Michael but later married Richard Beale in 1850 & Henry Lalor > became a Beale. It still shows Michael as a policeman. > > I have searched the whole of the 1851 census looking for Walter,but as his > mother wasn't married to Michael she may of married someone else,changed > Walter's surname or just vanished? > In 1859 Walter re-appears he joins the Navy,he lied about his age & joins > for 10 years. > 1861 census.......No Walter,perhaps he was at sea? > In 1863 Walter married Elizabeth Perrin in Marylebone,Middlesex & he > states on his marriage cert his father was John Lalor & not Michael! >>From 1863 till his death in 1920 i have all the details............. > > Back to Michael Lalor,it says on the 1841 census he was born in > Ireland,was born around 1821 & was a policeman,then he vanishes.....We > think we may of found Michael in Australia,he married Catherine Mullhall > around 1862,had a few children was a publican in a hotel & later died in > 1890 at Kew, Victoria Au. We are waiting for the marriage & death > certificates to be 100% sure......We also think that Michael could be the > brother of Peter Lalor who later became famous for the Eureka Stockade in > Australia. > Did Michael run away as he was caught having 2 children & would have to > pay twice the amount of money for both kids...........Did he have more > little Lalor's that are yet to be found? > > My 2 problems are........... > 1) I am stuck with trying to fill the 16 years from Walter's birth in > 1843 to his appearance again in 1859 then the 4 years before his marriage > in 1863.....Where did he go? > 2) If Michael was a policeman,would the police force want his parents > details,letter of permission etc etc? Are there any records of Michael > held anywhere,if there is,can i view them online? > Many thanks for your time. > Kaz. > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ______________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by Netintelligence > http://www.netintelligence.com/email > > ______________________________________________ This email has been scanned by Netintelligence http://www.netintelligence.com/email List archives are at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message