Many thanks for this Gus it has helped me on my way. Cheers from Valerie in sunny Sydney -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gus Tysoe Sent: Sunday, 4 April 2010 6:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WAR] Here is a different request to think about please ? - CULLODEN Hello Valerie, I agree with the expansions and translations so far posted - with the exception of the translation of "pat." This is a standard Catholic Baptism Register entry, and these usually include both a 'patrinus' and a 'patrina' - with appropriate names following. These, though are *not* 'father' or 'mother' (and with no religious connotation attached) but are the male and female "Baptismal Patrons" - effectively the equivalent of Church of England 'Godparents'. But as to *where* the baptism took place - and why it's seemingly classified as a burial - I cannot make any suggestions other than it was apparently NOT at Leamington, as that Catholic Congregation's Register doesn't start until 1822. Gus Tysoe [[email protected]] Gus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Valerie B Garton" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 2:35 AM Subject: [WAR] Here is a different request to think about please ? - CULLODEN >I would like to introduce myself please > > > > I am the worldwide representative for the Guild of One-Name Studies > [GOONS] > for the surname CULLODEN member no: 4825 and as such I am responsible for > finding and recording all references to this name [ with sources and or > references ] to record them as historical facts and to share with others. > > > > I am hoping that some one may be able to help me with my request please ? > > > > I have found the following: > > > > Warwickshire, England, Extracted Parish Records - from ancestry.co.uk > > Text: Jacous, fs. Joannis et Helenae Power: pat. Patririus Culloden nat. > 01 > Aug 1815 13 Aug 1815 > > Book: 1578. Burials. (Burial) > > Collection: - Registers of Baptisms, 1657- 1824 > > > > I find this rather confusing - is it a baptism or a burial ? Is Patririus > the minister and if so is he recored anywhere else. If not why does he > suddnely pop up here, where did he come from and where did he go ? > > > > Here's hoping there are some people out there who are able to assist - > all > comments gratefully received. > > > > Yours sincerely > > > > Mrs valerie B Garton > > Dip FHS and Assoc. Dip L & A H. > > Guild of One-Nmae Studies represnetative for CULLODEN & HIGGINSON > Worlwide - > member no: 4825 > > > > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message List archives are at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.800 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2788 - Release Date: 04/04/10 04:32:00

Many thanks for both your messages David they have certainly helped me on my way. I will order the film. Cheers from Valerie in sunny Sydney -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Steel Sent: Sunday, 4 April 2010 11:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WAR] Here is a different request to think about please ? - CULLODEN -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gus Tysoe Sent: Sunday, 4 April 2010 5:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WAR] Here is a different request to think about please ? - CULLODEN >But as to *where* the baptism took place - and why it's seemingly classified >as a burial - I cannot make any suggestions other than it was apparently NOT >at Leamington, as that Catholic Congregation's Register doesn't start until >1822. According to the IGI, the baptism took place at St Peter's Roman Catholic Church, Birmingham. David Steel Adelaide, South Australia List archives are at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.800 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2788 - Release Date: 04/04/10 04:32:00

-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gus Tysoe Sent: Sunday, 4 April 2010 5:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WAR] Here is a different request to think about please ? - CULLODEN >But as to *where* the baptism took place - and why it's seemingly classified >as a burial - I cannot make any suggestions other than it was apparently NOT >at Leamington, as that Catholic Congregation's Register doesn't start until >1822. According to the IGI, the baptism took place at St Peter's Roman Catholic Church, Birmingham. David Steel Adelaide, South Australia

-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Valerie B Garton >Text: Jacous, fs. Joannis et Helenae Power: pat. Patririus Culloden nat. 01 >Aug 1815 13 Aug 1815 This is saying James, son of John and Helen POWER, father Patrick CULLODEN, born 1st August, 1815, baptized 13th August, 1815. David Steel Adelaide, South Australia

I would like to introduce myself please I am the worldwide representative for the Guild of One-Name Studies [GOONS] for the surname CULLODEN member no: 4825 and as such I am responsible for finding and recording all references to this name [ with sources and or references ] to record them as historical facts and to share with others. I am hoping that some one may be able to help me with my request please ? I have found the following: Warwickshire, England, Extracted Parish Records - from ancestry.co.uk Text: Jacous, fs. Joannis et Helenae Power: pat. Patririus Culloden nat. 01 Aug 1815 13 Aug 1815 Book: 1578. Burials. (Burial) Collection: - Registers of Baptisms, 1657- 1824 I find this rather confusing - is it a baptism or a burial ? Is Patririus the minister and if so is he recored anywhere else. If not why does he suddnely pop up here, where did he come from and where did he go ? Here's hoping there are some people out there who are able to assist - all comments gratefully received. Yours sincerely Mrs valerie B Garton Dip FHS and Assoc. Dip L & A H. Guild of One-Nmae Studies represnetative for CULLODEN & HIGGINSON Worlwide - member no: 4825

Hello Valerie, I agree with the expansions and translations so far posted - with the exception of the translation of "pat." This is a standard Catholic Baptism Register entry, and these usually include both a 'patrinus' and a 'patrina' - with appropriate names following. These, though are *not* 'father' or 'mother' (and with no religious connotation attached) but are the male and female "Baptismal Patrons" - effectively the equivalent of Church of England 'Godparents'. But as to *where* the baptism took place - and why it's seemingly classified as a burial - I cannot make any suggestions other than it was apparently NOT at Leamington, as that Catholic Congregation's Register doesn't start until 1822. Gus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Valerie B Garton" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 2:35 AM Subject: [WAR] Here is a different request to think about please ? - CULLODEN >I would like to introduce myself please > > > > I am the worldwide representative for the Guild of One-Name Studies > [GOONS] > for the surname CULLODEN member no: 4825 and as such I am responsible for > finding and recording all references to this name [ with sources and or > references ] to record them as historical facts and to share with others. > > > > I am hoping that some one may be able to help me with my request please ? > > > > I have found the following: > > > > Warwickshire, England, Extracted Parish Records - from ancestry.co.uk > > Text: Jacous, fs. Joannis et Helenae Power: pat. Patririus Culloden nat. > 01 > Aug 1815 13 Aug 1815 > > Book: 1578. Burials. (Burial) > > Collection: - Registers of Baptisms, 1657- 1824 > > > > I find this rather confusing - is it a baptism or a burial ? Is Patririus > the minister and if so is he recored anywhere else. If not why does he > suddnely pop up here, where did he come from and where did he go ? > > > > Here's hoping there are some people out there who are able to assist - > all > comments gratefully received. > > > > Yours sincerely > > > > Mrs valerie B Garton > > Dip FHS and Assoc. Dip L & A H. > > Guild of One-Nmae Studies represnetative for CULLODEN & HIGGINSON > Worlwide - > member no: 4825 > > > > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Dear Valerie It is a baptismal record. It is in abbreviated and probably somewhat mistranscribed Latin. I guess that what is intended is: Jacobus, filius Joannis et Helenae Power, patrinus Patricius Culloden, natus 01 Aug 1815 13 Aug 1815 James, son of John and Ellen Power [?father] Patrick Culloden, born 01 Aug 1815, baptized 13 Aug 1815. Patrick was the child's godfather/baptismal sponsor. It might be helpful to look at other entries in the same register to confirm (or not) my interpretation. Sean ________________________________ From: Valerie B Garton <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, April 3, 2010 6:35:18 PM Subject: [WAR] Here is a different request to think about please ? - CULLODEN I would like to introduce myself please I am the worldwide representative for the Guild of One-Name Studies [GOONS] for the surname CULLODEN member no: 4825 and as such I am responsible for finding and recording all references to this name [ with sources and or references ] to record them as historical facts and to share with others. I am hoping that some one may be able to help me with my request please ? I have found the following: Warwickshire, England, Extracted Parish Records - from ancestry.co.uk Text: Jacous, fs. Joannis et Helenae Power: pat. Patririus Culloden nat. 01 Aug 1815 13 Aug 1815 Book: 1578. Burials. (Burial) Collection: - Registers of Baptisms, 1657- 1824 I find this rather confusing - is it a baptism or a burial ? Is Patririus the minister and if so is he recored anywhere else. If not why does he suddnely pop up here, where did he come from and where did he go ? Here's hoping there are some people out there who are able to assist - all comments gratefully received. Yours sincerely Mrs valerie B Garton Dip FHS and Assoc. Dip L & A H. Guild of One-Nmae Studies represnetative for CULLODEN & HIGGINSON Worlwide - member no: 4825 List archives are at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Pickard I thought this was Easter weekend but you've just given me a Christmas present ... I can now lay a few FLECKNOEs and SPARKESs to rest in Hunningham Many thanks Heather Pickard Trepess wrote: > Hi All, > > I've also added > > Hunningham burials from 1719-1812 and 1813 - 1865 > > Found from same index: www.hunimex.com/warwick/bmd/bmd_indx.html > > Happy Hunting > > Pickard

Hi All, I've also added Hunningham burials from 1719-1812 and 1813 - 1865 Found from same index: www.hunimex.com/warwick/bmd/bmd_indx.html Happy Hunting Pickard

Hi All, I'm still sitting on the wellsite waiting for a job to come up - lovely & sunny though a bit cold in the mornings. I've just uploaded the burials for Haseley St Mary from 1813 - 1865 You'll fine that and all the other BMD data on www.hunimex.com/warwick/bmd/bmd_indx.html In case you haven't noticed, if you hover over the spinning 'new' logo, the date of the upload can be seen ! Happy Hunting and Happy Easter Pickard Trepess in Kisnyek, Hungary

Hi All, I have just posted two new BMD files to my Pink Pages: Fenny Compton burials 1852 - 1882 and Halford baptisms 1874 - 1912 As usual links can be found on www.hunimex.com/warwick/bmd/bmd_indx.html Happy Hunting Pickard Trepess Languishing on a rigsite in Eastern Hungary, waiting for a service company to get their act together <g>

Hi Bill It seems to me you are not receiving all the list mail and wonder if your anti virus might be set a tad to high <g> Worth checking your spam folder if you have one (you can always check the archives to be sure of whats been posted you know) They married by certificate which is the equivalent of by licence in a Church in other words in haste And their disappearance to Scotland may be a signal also Although Henry was perhaps just old enough, Esther wasn't hence the haste Bad luck with your family history loss, just a suggestion but a periodic burn to CD or DVD and giving a copy to someone may be a good safeguard also, if your house burnt down (God forbid) at least a copy off site would be available Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Hi! Nivard, > > No I hadn't received the email with the info in attached link. > > I was replying to the last email I had received from you. > > The Hancock family moved to Scotland at some point as the family were > living > in Alloa in 1887. > > I have Parker in my tree could be a link to John Parker one of the > witnesses. > > If Esther and William were 23 in 1882 I thought they should have been born > about1859 no 1863. Maybe they weren't 23? > > I am having to put all my Family History back into my computer as I lost > it > all and had to get the HD wiped. > I have bought an external hard drive and all my Family will be stored on > that. Fingers crossed. > > Thank you for all your help. > > Regards, > > Bill

Hi! Nivard, No I hadn't received the email with the info in attached link. I was replying to the last email I had received from you. The Hancock family moved to Scotland at some point as the family were living in Alloa in 1887. I have Parker in my tree could be a link to John Parker one of the witnesses. If Esther and William were 23 in 1882 I thought they should have been born about1859 no 1863. Maybe they weren't 23? I am having to put all my Family History back into my computer as I lost it all and had to get the HD wiped. I have bought an external hard drive and all my Family will be stored on that. Fingers crossed. Thank you for all your help. Regards, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nivard Ovington" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [WAR] Hammersley of Bedworth - Trying again > Hello Bill > > Did you not see my previous reply ? > > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/WARWICK/2010-03/1269544053 > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > > > >> Their ages 23. >> >> By certificate??? >> >> The witnesses names are John Parker and Emma Beamish. > > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello Bill Did you not see my previous reply ? http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/WARWICK/2010-03/1269544053 Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Their ages 23. > > By certificate??? > > The witnesses names are John Parker and Emma Beamith.

Their ages 23. By certificate??? The witnesses names are John Parker and Emma Beamith. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nivard Ovington" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:24 PM Subject: Re: [WAR] Hammersley of Bedworth - Trying again > And their ages ? > > By banns or licence ? > > And who were the witnesses ? > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > > >>I have the following information. from a wedding certificate. >> >> My GGrandfather Henry Hancock married Esther Hammersley on 2nd April >> 1882. >> >> Esthers father Robert Hammersley occup Coalminer Her mother maiden name >> was Esther Randall >> >> Henrys father was Thomas Hancock occ Labourer. >> >> They were married in the Registers Office in the district of Foleshill, >> Warwick. >> >> They both lived in Leicester Street, Bedworth at the time of Marriage. >> >> I am looking for the births of Henry Hancock and his wife Esther >> Hammersley. >> >> Any help would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> >> Bill > > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

You're doing all the work, Nivard and making it all too easy!! Anne Paling SHEFFIELD, U.K. > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:09:55 +0000 > Subject: Re: [WAR] Hammersley of Bedworth - Trying again > > Some food for thought for you but needs more detail to be sure > > Such as where were they after 1882 when they married, where were their > children born etc? > > > ESTHER HAMMERSLEY > Birth: 02 MAY 1863 > Christening: 18 MAY 1863 Bedworth, Warwick, England > Father: ROBERT HAMMERSLEY > Mother: ESTHER > C039841 1813 - 1854 0555454 Film 0883775 Film > C039841 1854 - 1876 0555455 Film NONE > > Possible birth reg > Name: Esther Hammersley > Year of Registration: 1863 > Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun > District: Foleshill > County: Warwickshire > Volume: 6d > Page: 410 > > 1861 (Esthers parents) > Name: Robert Hammersley > Age: 40 > Estimated birth year: abt 1821 > Relation: Head > Spouse's name: Esther > Gender: Male > Where born: Bedworth, Warwickshire, England > Civil parish: Bedworth > County/Island: Warwickshire > Country: England > Registration district: Foleshill > Sub-registration district: Foleshill > ED, institution, or vessel: 18 > Neighbors: View others on page > Household schedule number: 34 > Household Members: > Name Age > Robert Hammersley 40 > Esther Hammersley 38 > Thomas Hammersley 15 > Mary Hammersley 3 > Hannah Hammersley 10 Mo > > RG9; Piece: 2199; Folio: 24; Page: 6; GSU roll: 542934 > > 1871 > Name: Esther Hammersley > Age: 7 > Estimated birth year: abt 1864 > Relation: Daughter > Mother's Name: Esther > Gender: Female > Where born: Bedworth, Warwickshire, England > Civil parish: Bedworth > County/Island: Warwickshire > Country: England > Registration district: Foleshill > Sub-registration district: Foleshill > ED, institution, or vessel: 18 > Household schedule number: 21 > Household Members: > Name Age > Esther Hammersley 48 > Mary Hammersley 12 > Hannah Hammersley 9 > Esther Hammersley 7 > > RG10; Piece: 3173; Folio: 36; Page: 5; GSU roll: 839244. > > > 1881 > Name: Henry Hancock > Age: 19 > Estimated birth year: abt 1862 > Relation: Boarder > Gender: Male > Where born: Blockley, Worcestershire, England > Civil parish: Astley > County/Island: Warwickshire > Country: England > Street Address: Bedworh Heath > Occupation: Colliery Labourer > Registration district: Nuneaton > Sub-registration district: Nuneaton > ED, institution, or vessel: 2 > Neighbors: View others on page > Household Members: > Name Age > John Dial 63 > Mary Dial 57 > William Anmell 18 > Henry Hancock 19 > > RG11; Piece: 3059; Folio: 16; Page: 7; GSU roll: 1341730. > > > 1871 > Name: Thomas Hanecak > Age: 39 > Estimated birth year: abt 1832 > Relation: Head > Spouse's name: Sarah > Gender: Male > Where born: Blockley, Worcestershire, England > Civil parish: Blockley > Ecclesiastical parish: Worcester > County/Island: Worcestershire > Country: England > Registration district: Shipston On Stour > Sub-registration district: Moreton > ED, institution, or vessel: 1 > Household schedule number: 173 > Household Members: > Name Age > Thomas Hanecak 39 > Sarah Hanecak 33 > Lucilla A Hanecak 16 > Emily C Hanecak 10 > Henry Hanecak 8 > Charles Hanecak 3 > John Hanecak 3 months > > RG10; Piece: 3215; Folio: 18; Page: 30; GSU roll: 839263. > > 1861 > Name: Thomas Hancock > Age: 29 > Estimated birth year: abt 1832 > Relation: Head > Spouse's name: Sarah > Gender: Male > Where born: Paxford, Worcestershire, England > Civil parish: Blockley > County/Island: Worcestershire > Country: England > Registration district: Shipston On Stour > Sub-registration district: Moreton > ED, institution, or vessel: 1f > Neighbors: View others on page > Household schedule number: 196 > Household Members: > Name Age > Thomas Hancock 29 > Sarah Hancock 23 > Lucilla A Hancock 6 > Emily Hancock 6 Mo > > RG9; Piece: 2238; Folio: 21; Page: 35; GSU roll: 542941. > > Possible birth for Henry HANCOCK > > Name: Henry John Hancock > Year of Registration: 1861 > Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec > District: Worcester > County: Hereford and Worcester, Worcestershire > Volume: 6c > Page: 263 > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > > >I have the following information. from a wedding certificate. > > > > My GGrandfather Henry Hancock married Esther Hammersley on 2nd April 1882. > > > > Esthers father Robert Hammersley occup Coalminer Her mother maiden name > > was Esther Randall > > > > Henrys father was Thomas Hancock occ Labourer. > > > > They were married in the Registers Office in the district of Foleshill, > > Warwick. > > > > They both lived in Leicester Street, Bedworth at the time of Marriage. > > > > I am looking for the births of Henry Hancock and his wife Esther > > Hammersley. > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > > > Bill > > List archives are at http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/

Some food for thought for you but needs more detail to be sure Such as where were they after 1882 when they married, where were their children born etc? ESTHER HAMMERSLEY Birth: 02 MAY 1863 Christening: 18 MAY 1863 Bedworth, Warwick, England Father: ROBERT HAMMERSLEY Mother: ESTHER C039841 1813 - 1854 0555454 Film 0883775 Film C039841 1854 - 1876 0555455 Film NONE Possible birth reg Name: Esther Hammersley Year of Registration: 1863 Quarter of Registration: Apr-May-Jun District: Foleshill County: Warwickshire Volume: 6d Page: 410 1861 (Esthers parents) Name: Robert Hammersley Age: 40 Estimated birth year: abt 1821 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Esther Gender: Male Where born: Bedworth, Warwickshire, England Civil parish: Bedworth County/Island: Warwickshire Country: England Registration district: Foleshill Sub-registration district: Foleshill ED, institution, or vessel: 18 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 34 Household Members: Name Age Robert Hammersley 40 Esther Hammersley 38 Thomas Hammersley 15 Mary Hammersley 3 Hannah Hammersley 10 Mo RG9; Piece: 2199; Folio: 24; Page: 6; GSU roll: 542934 1871 Name: Esther Hammersley Age: 7 Estimated birth year: abt 1864 Relation: Daughter Mother's Name: Esther Gender: Female Where born: Bedworth, Warwickshire, England Civil parish: Bedworth County/Island: Warwickshire Country: England Registration district: Foleshill Sub-registration district: Foleshill ED, institution, or vessel: 18 Household schedule number: 21 Household Members: Name Age Esther Hammersley 48 Mary Hammersley 12 Hannah Hammersley 9 Esther Hammersley 7 RG10; Piece: 3173; Folio: 36; Page: 5; GSU roll: 839244. 1881 Name: Henry Hancock Age: 19 Estimated birth year: abt 1862 Relation: Boarder Gender: Male Where born: Blockley, Worcestershire, England Civil parish: Astley County/Island: Warwickshire Country: England Street Address: Bedworh Heath Occupation: Colliery Labourer Registration district: Nuneaton Sub-registration district: Nuneaton ED, institution, or vessel: 2 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age John Dial 63 Mary Dial 57 William Anmell 18 Henry Hancock 19 RG11; Piece: 3059; Folio: 16; Page: 7; GSU roll: 1341730. 1871 Name: Thomas Hanecak Age: 39 Estimated birth year: abt 1832 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Sarah Gender: Male Where born: Blockley, Worcestershire, England Civil parish: Blockley Ecclesiastical parish: Worcester County/Island: Worcestershire Country: England Registration district: Shipston On Stour Sub-registration district: Moreton ED, institution, or vessel: 1 Household schedule number: 173 Household Members: Name Age Thomas Hanecak 39 Sarah Hanecak 33 Lucilla A Hanecak 16 Emily C Hanecak 10 Henry Hanecak 8 Charles Hanecak 3 John Hanecak 3 months RG10; Piece: 3215; Folio: 18; Page: 30; GSU roll: 839263. 1861 Name: Thomas Hancock Age: 29 Estimated birth year: abt 1832 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Sarah Gender: Male Where born: Paxford, Worcestershire, England Civil parish: Blockley County/Island: Worcestershire Country: England Registration district: Shipston On Stour Sub-registration district: Moreton ED, institution, or vessel: 1f Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 196 Household Members: Name Age Thomas Hancock 29 Sarah Hancock 23 Lucilla A Hancock 6 Emily Hancock 6 Mo RG9; Piece: 2238; Folio: 21; Page: 35; GSU roll: 542941. Possible birth for Henry HANCOCK Name: Henry John Hancock Year of Registration: 1861 Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec District: Worcester County: Hereford and Worcester, Worcestershire Volume: 6c Page: 263 Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >I have the following information. from a wedding certificate. > > My GGrandfather Henry Hancock married Esther Hammersley on 2nd April 1882. > > Esthers father Robert Hammersley occup Coalminer Her mother maiden name > was Esther Randall > > Henrys father was Thomas Hancock occ Labourer. > > They were married in the Registers Office in the district of Foleshill, > Warwick. > > They both lived in Leicester Street, Bedworth at the time of Marriage. > > I am looking for the births of Henry Hancock and his wife Esther > Hammersley. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > Bill

And their ages ? By banns or licence ? And who were the witnesses ? Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) >I have the following information. from a wedding certificate. > > My GGrandfather Henry Hancock married Esther Hammersley on 2nd April 1882. > > Esthers father Robert Hammersley occup Coalminer Her mother maiden name > was Esther Randall > > Henrys father was Thomas Hancock occ Labourer. > > They were married in the Registers Office in the district of Foleshill, > Warwick. > > They both lived in Leicester Street, Bedworth at the time of Marriage. > > I am looking for the births of Henry Hancock and his wife Esther > Hammersley. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > Bill

Hi! Anne, There are loads of ways to spell Hancock and I usually check anything that resembles Hancock. I don't have a clue where he was in 1881. This is as far as I have gotten with this side of my family tree. Regards, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "A P L" <[email protected]> To: "Warwick LIST-SUBMIT" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:01 AM Subject: Re: [WAR] HAMMERSLEY of Bedworth > > > > > > N.B. > > > > HANCOCK was also spelled HANCOX. > > > > Have just had a look at I.G.I. and realised the alternative spelling. Do > you know where he was on 1881 Census which should give you his birthplace > and, if you are lucky, his relations? > > Anne Paling > > > > SHEFFIELD, U.K. > > > >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:52:14 +0000 >> Subject: Re: [WAR] HAMMERSLEY of Bedworth >> >> >> >> >> The I.G.I. reference that I quoted earlier about Esther HAMMERSLEY looks >> like a probable for her 1863 birth & christening in Bedworth. There is a >> "FreeBMD" entry that confirms her birth in June Q 1863. If you order that >> certificate you will have her parents names. >> >> >> >> Henry HANCOCK is a more common name so we would need the father's name >> from his Marriage Certificate to sort him out from the several Henry >> HANCOCK births. >> >> Anne Paling >> >> SHEFFIELD, U.K. >> >> >> >> > From: [email protected] >> > To: [email protected] >> > Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:28:53 +0000 >> > Subject: Re: [WAR] HAMMERSLEY of Bedworth >> > >> > Hi! Anne, >> > >> > Thanks for your email. >> > >> > I have all the information for the wedding , I am trying to go back >> > another >> > generation and find the parents of both these couples especially Henry >> > Hancock. >> > >> > This my brick wall on the family. >> > >> > Regards, > > _________________________________________________________________ > Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/ > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi! Anne, I don't recall getting the message with the IGI reference, Regards, Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "A P L" <[email protected]> To: "Warwick LIST-SUBMIT" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:52 AM Subject: Re: [WAR] HAMMERSLEY of Bedworth > > > > The I.G.I. reference that I quoted earlier about Esther HAMMERSLEY looks > like a probable for her 1863 birth & christening in Bedworth. There is a > "FreeBMD" entry that confirms her birth in June Q 1863. If you order that > certificate you will have her parents names. > > > > Henry HANCOCK is a more common name so we would need the father's name > from his Marriage Certificate to sort him out from the several Henry > HANCOCK births. > > Anne Paling > > SHEFFIELD, U.K. > > > >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:28:53 +0000 >> Subject: Re: [WAR] HAMMERSLEY of Bedworth >> >> Hi! Anne, >> >> Thanks for your email. >> >> I have all the information for the wedding , I am trying to go back >> another >> generation and find the parents of both these couples especially Henry >> Hancock. >> >> This my brick wall on the family. >> >> Regards, >> >> Bill >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "A P L" <[email protected]> >> To: "Warwick LIST-SUBMIT" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 10:21 PM >> Subject: Re: [WAR] HAMMERSLEY of Bedworth >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hello again! >> > >> > >> > >> > What else were you wanting to know about this marriage? If you have a >> > copy of the Marriage Certificate you have all the information that I >> > can >> > think of. >> > >> > Anne Paling >> > >> > >> > >> > SHEFFIELD, U.K. >> > >> > >> > >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:02:04 +0000 >> >> Subject: [WAR] Hammersley of Bedworth >> >> >> >> >> >> Forgot to mention they were married on 2nd April 1882. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi! Anne, >> >> > >> >> > They were married in the Registers Office in the district of >> >> > Foleshill, >> >> > Warcwick. They both lived in Leicester Street, Bedworth at the time >> >> > of >> >> > Marriage. >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > _________________________________________________________________ >> > We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. >> > Tell >> > us now >> > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/ >> > List archives are at >> > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK >> > ------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> List archives are at >> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > _________________________________________________________________ > We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell > us now > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/ > List archives are at > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/WARWICK > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message