1830 WALLACE, JOHN F., Daviess Co., IN, page 385 1830 WALLACE, JOHN, Daviess Co., IN, page 380 1830 WALLACE, CHARLES JACKSON, Daviess Co., IN, page 389 My ancestor is Charles Jackson Wallace listed above - and I have the information on him from this census. He married Levina Peterson in Daviess Co., on 1 June 1826. Per a genealogy by J.M Behle of Indiana, I have placed Charles in the family of Robert Bruce Wallace and Rachel Hughes Wallace. However, I am now wondering about this for the following reasons. Charles and Levina had the following children: William Arthur Wallace, born 1827, Indiana John F. Wallace, born 1829, Indiana Catherine A. Wallace, born 1833, Indiana Margaret J. Wallace, born 1836, Illinois (probably Coles, Co.) Charles B. Wallace, born 1838, Illinois (probably Coles, Co.) Levina's parents were in all probability, William Peterson and Catherine Bruce who were married in Bracken Co., KY in 1808 and lived in Adams Co., Ohio before migrating to Daviess Co. where they appear on the 1830 Census. William Peterson purchased land in Daviess about 1818, and again in 1823. If we go by naming patterns in this case, oldest son named after wife's father, oldest daughter named after wife's mother, second son named after husband's father, second daughter named after husband's mother, we could think that Charles parents were John and Margaret Wallace. I see that there are two John Wallace families in the 1830 Daviess Co. Census, above. Was there a John married to Margaret who were old enough to have had a son born about 1800? Should investigate this possibility further, or am I looking for things that are not there? (It does appear that Charles son, John F., may be John Franklin and Charles' son William DID name his son William Franklin, so there is the tradition that runs through the family of Robert Wallace here.) Does anyone have any input? Thanks in advance. Claire Wichelmann