Thanks Kathleen. I thought I had tried all combinations but what you told me does work. I appreciate your help. Sharon Kathleen Burnett wrote: > > You need to insert Vintage-Photos not Vintage-Photos-L > > Kathleen > > Sharon McKenzie wrote: > > > Am I the only one who cannot access the Rootsweb Mailing List Archives? > > The link that Kathleen posted goes to the Mailing List Archives, > > however, after inserting "VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L" in the proper place and > > clicking on "submit query," I receive the message "There are no archives > > for that list. We may not host a list by that name, or maybe there just > > haven't been any messages posted to it yet." I had the same > > results with other lists I tried to find. What am I doing wrong? > > > > Thanks for any help you can give me. Sharon > > > > Kathleen Burnett wrote: > > > > > > Dear List Members, > > > > > > The new and imporved Rootsweb Mailing List Archive site is great. So > > > much better than before. When you have a moment, check it out. > > > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index > > > > > > Kathleen Burnett > > > List Mom > > > > > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > > > We have over 223 members of the Vintage-Photos Mailing List. Posting back > > > to the list helps the whole group, not just one person. If we work as a team, > > > we'll succeed as a team. > > > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > > > > > ============================== > > > Visit Ancestry.com for a FREE 14-Day Trial and enjoy access to the #1 > > > Source for Family History Online. Go to: > > > http://www.ancestry.com/subscribe/subscribetrial1y.asp?sourcecode=F11HB > > > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > > List problems? Contact the Vintage-Photos -List Mom kathleenburnett@earthlink.net > > Use Kathleen as the subject line for your post > > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > > > ============================== > > Join the RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > > Linking the world, one GEDCOM at a time. > > http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > NOTICE: Posting of virus warnings, test messages, chain letters, political > announcements, current events, items for sale, personal messages, flames, > etc. (in other words - spam) is NOT ALLOWED and will be grounds for removal. > Consideration for exceptions, contact Kathleen Burnett kathleenburnett@earthlink.net > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > ============================== > Shop Ancestry - Everything you need to Discover, Preserve & Celebrate > your heritage! > http://shop.myfamily.com/ancestrycatalog
For Jon" <Jon-370@worldnet.att.net> To: <VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L@rootsweb.com> For an excellent FREE photo manipulation program Visit one of the following:- Europe = http://www.irfanview.com/ U S A = http://www.ryansimmons.com/users/irfanview/ Austria = http://members.chello.at/irfan.skiljan/ Download Irfanview John Parker Researching LAWRENCE - Canterbury - 1812 onward HUELIN - Jersey & London PARKER - East London BURNS - Glasgow (Lanarkshire) & Ayrshire Photo's of HUELIN'S and LAWRENCE'S at http://homepages.about.com/saracen/parker_lawrence_huelin/ Family Tree at http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~parhuelaw/ > Someone sent me a 600dpi 3"x3" photo. > > Can anyone tell me how to set my Internet Explorer to view a .jpg file at the "image size" that was sent to me. > > All that I can view is a VERY BIG image, not the image at the "size" it was sent. > > I do NOT have a photo editing program. > > > > > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > Checkout the other lists being watched over by your List Mom; > http://mailing_lists.homestead.com/lists.html > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > ============================== > Ancestry.com Genealogical Databases > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist2.asp > Search over 2500 databases with one easy query! > >
Dear List Members, The new and imporved Rootsweb Mailing List Archive site is great. So much better than before. When you have a moment, check it out. http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index Kathleen Burnett List Mom
Hello Jon, If you would like to email me the photo I will see if I can enlarge it and send it back to you! stuandsher@earthlink.net Sherri -----Original Message----- From: Jon [mailto:Jon-370@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 7:31 AM To: VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [VINTAGE-PHOTOS] Large Image on screen Someone sent me a 600dpi 3"x3" photo. Can anyone tell me how to set my Internet Explorer to view a .jpg file at the "image size" that was sent to me. All that I can view is a VERY BIG image, not the image at the "size" it was sent. I do NOT have a photo editing program. ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== Checkout the other lists being watched over by your List Mom; http://mailing_lists.homestead.com/lists.html To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett ============================== Ancestry.com Genealogical Databases http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist2.asp Search over 2500 databases with one easy query!
Am I the only one who cannot access the Rootsweb Mailing List Archives? The link that Kathleen posted goes to the Mailing List Archives, however, after inserting "VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L" in the proper place and clicking on "submit query," I receive the message "There are no archives for that list. We may not host a list by that name, or maybe there just haven't been any messages posted to it yet." I had the same results with other lists I tried to find. What am I doing wrong? Thanks for any help you can give me. Sharon Kathleen Burnett wrote: > > Dear List Members, > > The new and imporved Rootsweb Mailing List Archive site is great. So > much better than before. When you have a moment, check it out. > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index > > Kathleen Burnett > List Mom > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > We have over 223 members of the Vintage-Photos Mailing List. Posting back > to the list helps the whole group, not just one person. If we work as a team, > we'll succeed as a team. > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > ============================== > Visit Ancestry.com for a FREE 14-Day Trial and enjoy access to the #1 > Source for Family History Online. Go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/subscribe/subscribetrial1y.asp?sourcecode=F11HB
Image files that I send by e-mail attachments are resized to no more than 600 pixels in the largest dimension, assuming that recipient might be using a screen set to 800x600. Everyone needs a photo editing program and a method of saving images along with highly detailed captions. My favorites are Family Tree Maker for genealogy scrapbooks and Paint Shop Pro for all scanning & image editing. Elizabeth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon" > I do NOT have a photo editing program.
Hi Jon, Why don't you download a free viewer? http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e9227474/english.htm I can attest that this viewer does far more than most that you would pay for, especially batch processing. Jim.
Someone sent me a 600dpi 3"x3" photo. Can anyone tell me how to set my Internet Explorer to view a .jpg file at the "image size" that was sent to me. All that I can view is a VERY BIG image, not the image at the "size" it was sent. I do NOT have a photo editing program.
What software do you use? Easy CD 4 & 5 and Click n'Burn have methods to make Video CDs however some older DVD players won't play them. Check the advertising for a specific DVD player. Elizabeth > I have a LARGE collection of Family Tree Photos already scanned in 'jpeg' > format. > I have a CD writer. > Does anyone Know a way to view these photos on a standard DVD Player?
I have a LARGE collection of Family Tree Photos already scanned in 'jpeg' format. I have a CD writer. Does anyone Know a way to view these photos on a standard DVD Player?
Dear List Members, I had a virus problem last evening and in cleaning my system I lost all e-mail messages that were in my inbox. If you have contacted me within the last week, needing help or asking a question, please re-send it to me KathleenBurnett@earthlink.net. Kathleen Burnett List Mom
Julie, Using 'Dating Old Photographs 1840-1929', my best guess is very early 1900s - circa 1900 to 1910. The lace and ruffles were most prevalent then - and the child on the left is wearing an outfit that (as much as I can see, anyway) looks exactly like my father-in-law's christening gown and he was born in 1902. Hope that helps. Jen from Oklahoma <G> > -----Original Message----- > From: Julie Alleman [mailto:juliealleman@yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:15 PM > To: VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [VINTAGE-PHOTOS] new list member with question > > > My BOSTON family of Mississippi suffered heavily in > the Civil War, and afterward became poor > Oklahoma/Texas sharecroppers. We have very, very few > photos. I have one "mystery" photo I was hoping > someone could help me put a date on. It appears > considerable older than the others I own, and seems to > be "fancier" than most of our pics. > > Would you help me date this photo of two children: > http://albums.photopoint.com/j/ViewPhoto?u=1005600&a=10467106&p=52 > 405921&f=0 > (please note the two-line URL) > > Most of our family photos are like this shot from > 1907: > http://albums.photopoint.com/j/ViewPhoto?u=1005600&a=10467106&p=52 > 405934&f=0 > (please note two-line URL) > > ... all dirty faces, bare feet, and sharecropper sack > dresses. The frilly white dresses and beautiful curly, > ribboned hair of the previous pic is a sharp contrast. > > > I think the first pic may be of an earlier time - it > is mounted on a stiff black card and is quite damaged. > The only identification is our family name "Boston" > penciled on the back. And these babies "look" like our > babies. > > Any advice would be appreciated!!! > > ~Julie in Oklahoma > http://www.kindredclans.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > The best and most beautiful things in the world cannot be seen, > or even touched. They must be felt with the heart. > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > ============================== > Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp > >
My BOSTON family of Mississippi suffered heavily in the Civil War, and afterward became poor Oklahoma/Texas sharecroppers. We have very, very few photos. I have one "mystery" photo I was hoping someone could help me put a date on. It appears considerable older than the others I own, and seems to be "fancier" than most of our pics. Would you help me date this photo of two children: http://albums.photopoint.com/j/ViewPhoto?u=1005600&a=10467106&p=52405921&f=0 (please note the two-line URL) Most of our family photos are like this shot from 1907: http://albums.photopoint.com/j/ViewPhoto?u=1005600&a=10467106&p=52405934&f=0 (please note two-line URL) ... all dirty faces, bare feet, and sharecropper sack dresses. The frilly white dresses and beautiful curly, ribboned hair of the previous pic is a sharp contrast. I think the first pic may be of an earlier time - it is mounted on a stiff black card and is quite damaged. The only identification is our family name "Boston" penciled on the back. And these babies "look" like our babies. Any advice would be appreciated!!! ~Julie in Oklahoma http://www.kindredclans.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
I suscribe to the Langa List which is a technology newsletter edited by Mr. Fred Langa a well know and highly respected technologist and technical editor. The current newsletter has the below article on how long to expect CD-ROM's to last. Since many of us are depending on CD's to archive our valuable genealogical data, I though you would be interested in reading what Fred thinks about them. You will to click on the hyper links to understand the full subject. (I hope the links remain working as I can't guarantee that.) Please note that I have Fred's permission to include the one article without change and retaining the hyper links, so if you pass this on, please do so and keep it intact so as not to violate the copyright. Regards, George Painter 1) Safe--- Or Sorry--- On CD-R Some CDs, especially those made with the light aqua phthalocyanine dye backed by a plastic-protected layer of gold metal foil, can last a long time. Others, using bluish cyanine dye backed by unprotected aluminum foil, can degrade fully ten times faster! And that's in normal circumstances. In unusual settings, things can get *very* weird: While flying on an airplane to Belize I read an article that shocked me. I researcher had been to Belize and discovered that some of his CDs were being eaten by a fungus. Here is an article describing his findings. http://www.nature.com/nsu/010628/010628-11.html ---Richard Bray Thanks, Richard! Maybe Symantec should include a can of Lysol in their next suite of Norton Utilities.... Fortunately, most of us don't have to worry about bugs *literally* eating our data. But tapes, floppies, and CDRs all do have finite lifespans, and you should know what you're getting into when you entrust your data to each medium. Specifically with CDRs, the "sweet spot" in selecting a CDR type for any given data storage task is the one that provides enough longevity to accomplish the storage task with a comfortable safety margin, but not so much as to needlessly raise the costs by paying for unnecessary longevity. The article at http://www.informationweek.com/thisweek/story/IWK20010719S0003?section=opinion has all the info you need to become an informed CDR consumer. You'll be able to identify the most common CDR types on sight, and also pick the kind that's just right--- and least expensive--- for your storage needs. Come check it out! And then join the discussion: What have you found that works well for short, medium, and long-term backup? If you're using tape, what steps are you taking to ensure long shelf life? If you're using CD-Rs, what types do you prefer, and why? What sources do you use for buying blank media? How long do you think your data will survive in storage? Do you periodically refresh old backups by re-recording onto new media? Please click to http://www.informationweek.com/forum/fredlanga and share your knowledge! Click to email this item to a friend http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm
Waving Hi to the list .... collector of old photographs here ,,, " Vintage " that is ,,, and a amatur Genealogy researcher to boot (( its a good thing I don't depend on it to feed my family ) looking for BOTT,CAIN,SULLIVAN,SHINE,MCINTYRE,MAHON from eastern Pa coal fields...Centralia, Shanendoah, Ashland, .... Joe Springdale,Ar .
Hi folks: A while back, I put a query out to the mailing list about a photo that I had of several chaps in uniform that was taken in the early 1900's, I believed, somewhere near Bradford, YKS. I received many many replies, and although I tried to answer everyone individually, please take this as thanks if I missed you. You were all so helpful! For those of you who were unable to view the 450KB jpg, I have now uploaded a smaller jpg with less resolution for you at http://members.home.net/klawry/ What an amazing assortment of ideas and suggestions came through. And all thoughts were good ones. In the process, I learned a lot! The double breasted uniforms led some people to suspect that these people might be the crew of a passenger ship, firemen, or a brass band. All of these uniforms were double breasted at the time. Some folk were able to date the photo to around 1905, based on the dress of the ladies. Some folks thought that the flared pants suggested French sailors. People pointed out the nets in the background. Was the picture taken near the sea? The definitive answer, I believe, came from Iain Kerr of the GREATWAR-L list, and I include his reply in its entirety, with his permission, here. Kathleen, The men in uniform are wearing British Army uniforms and rank badges. The majority of the men are wearing the Broderick cap, a peak-less cap of German origin, which was the uniform forage cap for many regiments between 1902 and 1905. Being unpopular it was replaced by the more familiar peaked forage cap. The setting suggests that the photograph was of a group of officers, NCOs and men with their families before or after a territorial training camp. Unfortunately it is not possible to distinguish the design of the cap badge or the badge on one of the men's belts which would have allowed identification of the regiment. There were two territorial units based in Bradford before WWI. They were: The 2nd Volunteer Battalion, The Prince of Wales's Own (West Yorkshire Regiment); from 1908, the 6th Battalion, The Prince of Wales's Own (West Yorkshire Regiment) (Territorial Force) whose cap badge was a horse on a scroll; The 2nd West Yorkshire, Royal Garrison Artillery (Volunteers); from 1908 the 2nd West Riding Brigade, Royal Field Artillery (Territorial Force) whose cap badge would have been a Royal Artillery design involving a wheeled gun on a scroll. Yours aye, Iain Kerr in Windsor, Berkshire, United Kingdom Web Page at: http://home.clara.net/iainkerr/index.htm RootsWeb Sponsor and Listowner for the WORLDWAR2 Mailing List. Again, my sincere thanks to everyone. Kathleen in Red Deer, Alberta
Jen, what a lovely reply. So very helpful. And thank you for dating the hats for me. This is an invaluable piece of information. I have received many replies ranging from fire brigade uniforms (apparently very navy like) to fire brigade/police often being the same force, to noting the nets in the background and wondering, like you, if it might have been taken near the sea. The fellow who had this photo did run away to sea circa 1909, but I can't place him in the photo (I have other photos of him at this time). Maybe he took the photograph. Once again, thank you, sincerely, Kathleen ----- Original Message ----- From: Jenny Dahl <jdahl@mmcable.com> To: <VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: RE: [VINTAGE-PHOTOS] Does anyone have any thoughts on dating this photo? > This page is under construction, but you might want to watch it for future > reference regarding British Naval Uniforms... other branches of the British > Military can be found at the root british-forces.com > > http://british-forces.com/rtw/uni-rank/uni-rank-index.html > > After looking at those, I got a wild hair and took a look at the uniforms > that the crew of the Titanic wore (on the actual ship, not in the movie)in > 1912. Take a look here and see how close - perhaps your picture is of a > passenger ship crew? > > http://titanic.eb.com/03_SINK/pict_16.html > > And judging by the ladies' hats, and referring to 'Dating Old Photographs' > from Family Chronicle, it was taken circa 1905-1915. The picture with the > hats most like those in your photograph is dated 1909. > > Jen > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kathleen Lawry [mailto:klawry@home.com] > > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 11:03 AM > > To: VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L@rootsweb.com > > Subject: [VINTAGE-PHOTOS] Does anyone have any thoughts on dating this > > photo? > > > > > > Hi folks: This may not be the appropriate place to ask this and > > my apologies for this (does anyone know a mailing list that might > > be the right place?), but could people please take a look at this > > photo at http://members.home.net/klawry/ , and let me know if > > they have any thoughts. It's a postcard, so it likely dates from > > the early 1900's, but I can't identify the uniforms. It was > > likely taken near Bradford, YKS,England. > > > > Thank you so much in advance, > > > > Kay in Red Deer, Alberta > > > > > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > > Checkout the other lists being watched over by your List Mom; > > http://mailing_lists.homestead.com/lists.html > > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > > > ============================== > > Create a FREE family website at MyFamily.com! > > http://www.myfamily.com/banner.asp?ID=RWLIST2 > > > > > > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > List problems? Contact the Vintage-Photos -List Mom kathleenburnett@earthlink.net > Use Kathleen as the subject line for your post > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > ============================== > Visit Ancestry.com for a FREE 14-Day Trial and enjoy access to the #1 > Source for Family History Online. Go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/subscribe/subscribetrial1y.asp?sourcecode=F11HB >
This page is under construction, but you might want to watch it for future reference regarding British Naval Uniforms... other branches of the British Military can be found at the root british-forces.com http://british-forces.com/rtw/uni-rank/uni-rank-index.html After looking at those, I got a wild hair and took a look at the uniforms that the crew of the Titanic wore (on the actual ship, not in the movie)in 1912. Take a look here and see how close - perhaps your picture is of a passenger ship crew? http://titanic.eb.com/03_SINK/pict_16.html And judging by the ladies' hats, and referring to 'Dating Old Photographs' from Family Chronicle, it was taken circa 1905-1915. The picture with the hats most like those in your photograph is dated 1909. Jen > -----Original Message----- > From: Kathleen Lawry [mailto:klawry@home.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 11:03 AM > To: VINTAGE-PHOTOS-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [VINTAGE-PHOTOS] Does anyone have any thoughts on dating this > photo? > > > Hi folks: This may not be the appropriate place to ask this and > my apologies for this (does anyone know a mailing list that might > be the right place?), but could people please take a look at this > photo at http://members.home.net/klawry/ , and let me know if > they have any thoughts. It's a postcard, so it likely dates from > the early 1900's, but I can't identify the uniforms. It was > likely taken near Bradford, YKS,England. > > Thank you so much in advance, > > Kay in Red Deer, Alberta > > > ==== VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > Checkout the other lists being watched over by your List Mom; > http://mailing_lists.homestead.com/lists.html > To learn more about my world visit http://dwp.bigplanet.com/kburnett > > ============================== > Create a FREE family website at MyFamily.com! > http://www.myfamily.com/banner.asp?ID=RWLIST2 > >
Hi folks: This may not be the appropriate place to ask this and my apologies for this (does anyone know a mailing list that might be the right place?), but could people please take a look at this photo at http://members.home.net/klawry/ , and let me know if they have any thoughts. It's a postcard, so it likely dates from the early 1900's, but I can't identify the uniforms. It was likely taken near Bradford, YKS,England. Thank you so much in advance, Kay in Red Deer, Alberta
Dear List Members, Here it is the end June and time for the Second Quarterly Report for 2001. Can you believe how fast the time has passed? This one almost passed me by. The VINTAGE-PHOTOS Mailing List has 265 members, 170 on the Regular list and 95 members on the Digest List. As most of you know by now, the GenConnect Boards have changed. Rootsweb.com and Ancestry.com are continuing their merger and now have merged the GenConnect Boards. I am not sure of my feeling regarding this yet, but will watch it and let you know. I am not one to jump to conclusions quickly. I also take care of many GenConnect Boards and did loose all of them in which I did not take care of the Query board due all the boards, bios, wills, pensions, etc. being combined within the Query board. If you used one of these boards, now you know why I suddenly disappeared. I know many of you have concerns regarding copyright laws and the information you post to the boards and the mailing lists. The following was posted by Rootsweb Management. "When you post messages to mailing lists, message boards, and other facilities at RootsWeb, those posts remain your property under copyright law." The same is true for those using the message boards at Ancestry.com. In short, if you posted it, you own it." If you are interested in knowing about other mailing list out there, one of the very best inventories of genealogical mailing lists is John Fullers Genealogy Resources on the Internet located at http://www.rootsweb.com/~jfuller/gen_mail.html If you ever need to unsubscribe from this list or any rootsweb list all you need to do is visit Password Central located at http://passwordcentral.rootsweb.com/ Follow the instructions and you will received an e-mail of all lists you belong to and from it you can unsubscribe from the ones you want to. Always know that I will be more than happy to help you if you are having problems unsubscribing, you only need to ask. If you would like to visit the Archived messages of this list, go to http://archiver.rootsweb.com/ and type in the name of the list you would like to search. Please remember, so that this list is better for each of us, the posting of virus warnings, test messages, chain letters, political announcements, current events, items for sale, personal messages, flames, etc., in other words Spam is NOT ALLOWED and will be grounds for removal. Consideration for exceptions, contact me at KathleenBurnett@earthlink.net There are a few items I would like to suggest for the benefit of each of us. 1. If someone posts a message to the list that should not have been posted, please just delete it. Know that I am taking care of the problem. If you post your unhappiness, then you just continue on the problem. I know it is hard when your heart has been offended, but for my sake, and the sake of the list, please just delete it. Rootsweb has a wonderful Spam Detective and it stops most of it. You should see what comes across my screen. I have to look at each of them to make sure that what was stopped was truly Spam. Once in a while, one slips by though and if this happens, just delete it and go on with what we all love, genealogical research. 2. If you would put the subject of your posting in the subject line it might give you a better chance to attract the attention of someone who has the information you are looking for or the attention of someone who is searching for the information you are posting. 3. Please remember to delete the tags and un-needed words when you re-send a message to the list with your answer. If you don't check this, your responses can become quite large and may cause problems with some of our member's servers. This member who might not be able to receive your message because of its size, just might be your long lost second cousin with all the answers you are looking for. 4. The wonderful relationship that develops between list members is also one of a Mailing Lists Problems. I encourage you to respond to the entire list with genealogical responses, you never know who your response will help. In the same thought I would like to ask you to not respond to the entire list with personal responses. Such as, the first message from a member says "Happy Birthday Mary" and then Mary says "Thank you and then about 60 of our members also send "Happy Birthday Mary". This is what I mean by personal messages. Just keep in mind anything is ok to be posted as long as it has to do with the subject of the list. If you have a doubt ask me. KathleenBurnett@earthlink.net 5. Remember to keep your Virus protection up to date and never open any attached file unless you are 100% sure what it is and even then you are taking a chance. I want to thank each of you for your continued support of me and your willingness to help make this list the success it is. Kathleen Burnett List Mom KathleenBurnett@earthlink.net