Linda, I don't know of a connection. My maiden name was Owens. I descend from a John Owens, whose children are listed as being born in Tn. where in Tn. I don't know. I do not know who this Abraham Owens is the son of. Who was Lydia Ann Patrick Owens's parents? Shirley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill & Linda Atwell" <bill.lin.atwell@mindspring.com> To: <VARUSSEL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:04 PM Subject: Re: [VARUSSEL] To Shirley Owens-Fletcher -- William Johnson & Susannah Thompson > Shirley, > > Is there any connection that you know of between Abraham Owens & Lydia Ann > Patrick Owens who married John Hunt Jackson (my gggrandparents) in Russell > Cty.? > > Tx, > Linda (Kelly) Atwell > Born in Bluefield, WV > Living in Monrovia, MD > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "clyde783" <clyde783@charter.net> > > To: <VARUSSEL-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 5:16 PM > > Subject: Re: [VARUSSEL] William Johnson & Susannah Thompson > > > > I have William Johnson born 11/17/1764, died 5/2/1801 Married to Susannah > > Thompson (daughter of Richard Thompson Sr.) I have two children for them > > Leana Jemima Johnson married to Abraham Owens and John Johnson married > > to Elizabeth Fletcher....... > > > > Shirley Owens-Fletcher > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <mj1934@hotmail.com> > > > To: <VARUSSEL-L@rootsweb.com> > > > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 9:56 AM > > > Subject: [VARUSSEL] William Johnson & Susannah Thompson > > > > > > > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > > > Classification: Query > > > > Message Board URL: > > > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/ABC.2ACE/3729 > > > > > > > > Message Board Post: > > > > Any info. on William Johnson born abt 1760 m Susannah > > > > Thompson d/o John Thompson. They are listed in tax list of > > > > Russell Co., VA. Thanks in advance. > > > ==== VARUSSEL Mailing List ==== > It is ok to send messages that have genealogical value to the mailing > list. However, if the nature of your messages have turned more personal > and no longer have any real genealogical value then they should probably > be sent in private. >