> Researching Christopher P. DEAN(E), b, VA 1794, md Mary HOGG 2/23/1822 in > Richmond, Henrico Co, VA Children: Robt Dean, Martha E. Dean, Wm H. > Dean, Mary Ann Dean, Virginia Dean. All lived in Richmond (city), VA. > > Frank Dean > Arnold, MD > > ______________________________

Do you have anything on Isaac Gregory who was in Lunenburg Co. VA about 1760, which county became Mecklenburg Co. VA. Isaac took his family and moved to SC about 1768. Isaac's wife was Alse unknown. Thank you. --- [email protected] wrote: > > marriages of nelson county 1820-1850 > northumberland marriages 1783-1850 > montgomery county marriages 1733-1831 > madison marriages 1797-1850 > mecklenburg marriages 1765-1810 > > wills of new kent 1864-87 sporadic > lancaster wills 1653-1800 > > > > misc. > > the parish register of saint peters, new kent > county va 1680-1787 > MEAD'S BOOK "old churches, ministers and > families of virginia" BEFORE 1850 & > ONLY EPISCOPAL > > kristina > _WWW.NYVAGENEALOGY.HOMESTEAD.COM_ > (http://www.NYVAGENEALOGY.HOMESTEAD.COM) > > > > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories > about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added > in the last 12 months. > Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > >

The Pamunkey Indians, I believe, were loosely centered in King William County - where there is still (I think) a 1200 acre reservation. The numbers of Pamunkeys have dwindled from the 1600s when there were as many as 6000 members of the Powhatan Confederacy. In the 1980s there were still about 100 Pamunkeys living on the reservation with maybe 1000 living nearby. The Treaty of 1677 still allows for the Indians to make an annual tribute to the governor in lieu of paying real estate taxes on their reservation. I first noticed this in 1996 when Chief Swift Water (William Miles) and several of the local tribesman presented a five-point buck to Governor George Allen at the Governor's Mansion shortly before Thanksgiving. The deer was donated to Hunters for the Homeless. The custom continues today. Beverly Fleet in her Virginia Colonial Abstracts, Volume 2, describes early incidents with the Pamunkeys. Once a year, the Queen of the Pamunkey Indians went to Richmond, accompanied by her braves, to pay the yearly tribute to the Governor of Virginia. A treaty signed in 1646 and amended in 1677 called for the Pamunkeys to make an annual offering to the governor. The tribute was Virginia game - a deer, so many brace of wild ducks, wild turkeys, and so on. The Queen would arrive, wearing a crown presented by King Charles II to her tribe (now found in the John Marshall House in Richmond). In the early 1800s, they stayed there in the home of William Munford. They would take possession of the parlor of the house. Deer skins were spread upon the floor. At night, the queen lay down in the center and the braves lay around her, feet out and their heads touching some part of her body. At the slightest sound, the barking of a dog or a cat fight, the braves would be on their feet, bows drawn, with the queen protected in the center. I have long been a Littlepage genealogist. The only reason I know anything about the Pamunkeys is that their history is intertwined with the Littlepage family. Richard Littlepage first settled in what is now New Kent County about 1660. His son, Captain Richard Littlepage, is said to have negotiated with the Queen of the Pamunkey concerning Indian hire. It is noted that she lived near the Littlepage home - known as Cumberland. The home still stands - lovelier than ever. Most maps of that period clearly show Cumberland - located on the Pamunkey River. The town of Cumberland was a major port of those times and had one of the first Customs houses in Virginia. Hayden, in his Glassell Family Genealogy, said that on October 25, 1711, Richard Littlepage of New Kent County petitioned the Assembly for license to employ Indians: one woman, Mary, for a hyred servant, and for one man to hunt for him. This was granted, provided that whenever the Queen of Pamunkey shall recall them they shall at once be dismissed. When it was decided that the capital of Virginia should be removed from Williamsburg elsewhere in 1780, there was much discussion of where the new capital should be located. Among those placed suggested for the new capital was Cumberland. Thank heavens it lost by 3 votes to Richmond. The area looks very much today as it must have looked 300 years ago. Lovely. On December 7, 1784, the Indians on the Pamunkey petitioned the House of Delegates to appoint certain gentlemen to protect them in their persons and rights. Thomas Littlepage, great-grandson of the first Richard, was one of those named. Joyce -----Original Message----- From: Dorothy C. White [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 3:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: FW: [VAROOTS] Succession in Powhatan Empire Tappahanock, VA is on the Pamunkey River. That is in Essex Co., VA. I hope this helps. Dorothy C. White [email protected] 804.795.4296 > -----Original Message----- > From: cristy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 6:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VAROOTS] Succession in Powhatan Empire > > > Hi, sorry I cant help but am interested in knowing where the Pamunkey > lived in Virginia? Years ago, my grandmother said we had ties to > them. But I have no clue from where yet. > > Christine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vickie Elam White" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:18 PM > Subject: [VAROOTS] Succession in Powhatan Empire > > > > OK, I'm really trying to understand this, so please bear with me! > > > > I read the following: > > > > "Historical accounts note several methods by which Powhatan > > [Wahunsonacock] consolidated his hold over his dominions. > Of particular > > significance was his use of a three-tiered government. > Below the paramount > > chief were the district chiefs, and below them were chiefs > of individual > > villages." > > > > Source: Helen C. Rountree and E. Randolph Turner III, "On > the Fringe > > of > > the Southeast: The Powhatan Paramount Chiefdom in > Virginia", publ. in __ > > The Forgotten Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the > American South > > 1521-1704 __, ed. by C. Hudson and C. Tesser (Athens: University of > > Georgia Press, 1994), pg. 364 > > > > So, my question concerns Openchancanough and his > successors. It seems > > as > > if some accounts I read say that his successors became > "paramount" chiefs > > of the Empire when they were actually successors to the > sub-chieftan > > positions. > > > > I've read that when Jamestown was founded, Openchancanough > was "chief" > > of > > the Pamunkey and thus a sub-chief under his brother > Powhatan. Then he > > succeeded his brother Opitchipan to become "paramount" > chief of the Empire > > himself in 1618-1619. It appears as if that opened up a > spot for a new > > "chief" of the Pamunkey. Is that where Nectowance comes in? > But, since he > > signed the 1646 treaty with the English, it seems as though > Nectowance may > > have been a "paramount" chief of the Empire rather than a > sub-chief. So, > > if Nectowance moved up from sub-chief to "paramount" chief, > then he must > > have been either a uterine-brother of Openchancanough (and > thus Powhatan) > > or the son of Openchancanough's (and Powhatan's) > uterine-sister. Right? > > > > If I'm right so far, I'll continue. > > > > I've read differing accounts about who was the "chief" of > the Pamunkey > > after Nectowance - either after his "promotion" to > "paramount" chief in > > 1644 or after his death ca 1649. Some say Totopotomoi > succeeded Nectowance > > but some say his wife Cockacoeske (known as "Queen Betty") > did. Some say > > Totopotomoi succeeded first, then after his death in 1656, > she succeeded > > Totopotomoi. > > > > Then, there was Cockacoeske's long reign until her death ca 1686, > > after which her niece "Queen Anne" succeeded her. By this time, > the Empire was > > no more and the title was simple "chief" of the Pamunkey, correct? > > > > If the above makes sense, and someone can correct any > mistakes, then > > maybe > > I can figure out some bloodlines. That is, assuming the rules for > > matrilineal descent for the "paramount" chief position > applied also to the > > "sub-chief" positions. Did it? > > > > > > Vickie Elam White > > [email protected] > > > > > > ============================== > > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records > added in the > > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > > > > > ============================== > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn > more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx > > ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx

Tappahanock, VA is on the Pamunkey River. That is in Essex Co., VA. I hope this helps. Dorothy C. White [email protected] 804.795.4296 > -----Original Message----- > From: cristy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 6:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VAROOTS] Succession in Powhatan Empire > > > Hi, sorry I cant help but am interested in knowing where the > Pamunkey lived > in Virginia? Years ago, my grandmother said we had ties to > them. But I > have no clue from where yet. > > Christine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vickie Elam White" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:18 PM > Subject: [VAROOTS] Succession in Powhatan Empire > > > > OK, I'm really trying to understand this, so please bear with me! > > > > I read the following: > > > > "Historical accounts note several methods by which Powhatan > > [Wahunsonacock] consolidated his hold over his dominions. > Of particular > > significance was his use of a three-tiered government. > Below the paramount > > chief were the district chiefs, and below them were chiefs > of individual > > villages." > > > > Source: Helen C. Rountree and E. Randolph Turner III, "On > the Fringe > > of > > the Southeast: The Powhatan Paramount Chiefdom in > Virginia", publ. in __ > > The Forgotten Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the > American South > > 1521-1704 __, ed. by C. Hudson and C. Tesser (Athens: University of > > Georgia Press, 1994), pg. 364 > > > > So, my question concerns Openchancanough and his > successors. It seems > > as > > if some accounts I read say that his successors became > "paramount" chiefs > > of the Empire when they were actually successors to the > sub-chieftan > > positions. > > > > I've read that when Jamestown was founded, Openchancanough > was "chief" > > of > > the Pamunkey and thus a sub-chief under his brother > Powhatan. Then he > > succeeded his brother Opitchipan to become "paramount" > chief of the Empire > > himself in 1618-1619. It appears as if that opened up a > spot for a new > > "chief" of the Pamunkey. Is that where Nectowance comes in? > But, since he > > signed the 1646 treaty with the English, it seems as though > Nectowance may > > have been a "paramount" chief of the Empire rather than a > sub-chief. So, > > if Nectowance moved up from sub-chief to "paramount" chief, > then he must > > have been either a uterine-brother of Openchancanough (and > thus Powhatan) > > or the son of Openchancanough's (and Powhatan's) > uterine-sister. Right? > > > > If I'm right so far, I'll continue. > > > > I've read differing accounts about who was the "chief" of > the Pamunkey > > after Nectowance - either after his "promotion" to > "paramount" chief in > > 1644 or after his death ca 1649. Some say Totopotomoi > succeeded Nectowance > > but some say his wife Cockacoeske (known as "Queen Betty") > did. Some say > > Totopotomoi succeeded first, then after his death in 1656, > she succeeded > > Totopotomoi. > > > > Then, there was Cockacoeske's long reign until her death ca 1686, > > after > > which her niece "Queen Anne" succeeded her. By this time, > the Empire was > > no more and the title was simple "chief" of the Pamunkey, correct? > > > > If the above makes sense, and someone can correct any > mistakes, then > > maybe > > I can figure out some bloodlines. That is, assuming the rules for > > matrilineal descent for the "paramount" chief position > applied also to the > > "sub-chief" positions. Did it? > > > > > > Vickie Elam White > > [email protected] > > > > > > ============================== > > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records > added in the > > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > > > > > ============================== > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn > more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx > >

marriages of nelson county 1820-1850 northumberland marriages 1783-1850 montgomery county marriages 1733-1831 madison marriages 1797-1850 mecklenburg marriages 1765-1810 wills of new kent 1864-87 sporadic lancaster wills 1653-1800 misc. the parish register of saint peters, new kent county va 1680-1787 MEAD'S BOOK "old churches, ministers and families of virginia" BEFORE 1850 & ONLY EPISCOPAL kristina _WWW.NYVAGENEALOGY.HOMESTEAD.COM_ (http://www.NYVAGENEALOGY.HOMESTEAD.COM)

Hi, sorry I cant help but am interested in knowing where the Pamunkey lived in Virginia? Years ago, my grandmother said we had ties to them. But I have no clue from where yet. Christine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vickie Elam White" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 4:18 PM Subject: [VAROOTS] Succession in Powhatan Empire > OK, I'm really trying to understand this, so please bear with me! > > I read the following: > > "Historical accounts note several methods by which Powhatan > [Wahunsonacock] consolidated his hold over his dominions. Of particular > significance was his use of a three-tiered government. Below the paramount > chief were the district chiefs, and below them were chiefs of individual > villages." > > Source: Helen C. Rountree and E. Randolph Turner III, "On the Fringe of > the Southeast: The Powhatan Paramount Chiefdom in Virginia", publ. in __ > The Forgotten Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the American South > 1521-1704 __, ed. by C. Hudson and C. Tesser (Athens: University of > Georgia Press, 1994), pg. 364 > > So, my question concerns Openchancanough and his successors. It seems as > if some accounts I read say that his successors became "paramount" chiefs > of the Empire when they were actually successors to the sub-chieftan > positions. > > I've read that when Jamestown was founded, Openchancanough was "chief" of > the Pamunkey and thus a sub-chief under his brother Powhatan. Then he > succeeded his brother Opitchipan to become "paramount" chief of the Empire > himself in 1618-1619. It appears as if that opened up a spot for a new > "chief" of the Pamunkey. Is that where Nectowance comes in? But, since he > signed the 1646 treaty with the English, it seems as though Nectowance may > have been a "paramount" chief of the Empire rather than a sub-chief. So, > if Nectowance moved up from sub-chief to "paramount" chief, then he must > have been either a uterine-brother of Openchancanough (and thus Powhatan) > or the son of Openchancanough's (and Powhatan's) uterine-sister. Right? > > If I'm right so far, I'll continue. > > I've read differing accounts about who was the "chief" of the Pamunkey > after Nectowance - either after his "promotion" to "paramount" chief in > 1644 or after his death ca 1649. Some say Totopotomoi succeeded Nectowance > but some say his wife Cockacoeske (known as "Queen Betty") did. Some say > Totopotomoi succeeded first, then after his death in 1656, she succeeded > Totopotomoi. > > Then, there was Cockacoeske's long reign until her death ca 1686, after > which her niece "Queen Anne" succeeded her. By this time, the Empire was > no more and the title was simple "chief" of the Pamunkey, correct? > > If the above makes sense, and someone can correct any mistakes, then maybe > I can figure out some bloodlines. That is, assuming the rules for > matrilineal descent for the "paramount" chief position applied also to the > "sub-chief" positions. Did it? > > > Vickie Elam White > [email protected] > > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > >

OK, I'm really trying to understand this, so please bear with me! I read the following: "Historical accounts note several methods by which Powhatan [Wahunsonacock] consolidated his hold over his dominions. Of particular significance was his use of a three-tiered government. Below the paramount chief were the district chiefs, and below them were chiefs of individual villages." Source: Helen C. Rountree and E. Randolph Turner III, "On the Fringe of the Southeast: The Powhatan Paramount Chiefdom in Virginia", publ. in __ The Forgotten Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the American South 1521-1704 __, ed. by C. Hudson and C. Tesser (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1994), pg. 364 So, my question concerns Openchancanough and his successors. It seems as if some accounts I read say that his successors became "paramount" chiefs of the Empire when they were actually successors to the sub-chieftan positions. I've read that when Jamestown was founded, Openchancanough was "chief" of the Pamunkey and thus a sub-chief under his brother Powhatan. Then he succeeded his brother Opitchipan to become "paramount" chief of the Empire himself in 1618-1619. It appears as if that opened up a spot for a new "chief" of the Pamunkey. Is that where Nectowance comes in? But, since he signed the 1646 treaty with the English, it seems as though Nectowance may have been a "paramount" chief of the Empire rather than a sub-chief. So, if Nectowance moved up from sub-chief to "paramount" chief, then he must have been either a uterine-brother of Openchancanough (and thus Powhatan) or the son of Openchancanough's (and Powhatan's) uterine-sister. Right? If I'm right so far, I'll continue. I've read differing accounts about who was the "chief" of the Pamunkey after Nectowance - either after his "promotion" to "paramount" chief in 1644 or after his death ca 1649. Some say Totopotomoi succeeded Nectowance but some say his wife Cockacoeske (known as "Queen Betty") did. Some say Totopotomoi succeeded first, then after his death in 1656, she succeeded Totopotomoi. Then, there was Cockacoeske's long reign until her death ca 1686, after which her niece "Queen Anne" succeeded her. By this time, the Empire was no more and the title was simple "chief" of the Pamunkey, correct? If the above makes sense, and someone can correct any mistakes, then maybe I can figure out some bloodlines. That is, assuming the rules for matrilineal descent for the "paramount" chief position applied also to the "sub-chief" positions. Did it? Vickie Elam White [email protected]

marriages of nelson county 1820-1850 northumberland marriages 1783-1850 montgomery county marriages 1733-1831 madison marriages 1797-1850 mecklenburg marriages 1765-1810 wills of new kent 1864-87 sporadic lancaster wills 1653-1800 misc. the parish register of saint peters, new kent county va 1680-1787 MEAD'S BOOK "old churches, ministers and families of virginia" BEFORE 1850 & ONLY EPISCOPAL kristina _www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com_ (http://www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com)

On 9 Jan 1823, in Alexandria, Va., Mr. Samuel Reese was married to Miss Harriet M'Cuin by the Rev. Robert Burch. Can anyone i.d. Samuel & his bride?

Kristina, I thank you for your generosity. When you can will you send info on JOHN MARTIN 27 B Thanks so much. Barb, Athens WV [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [VAROOTS] GOOCHLAND REVISTED............ FREE GOOCHLAND LOOK UPS OFFERED FOR DOUGLAS REGISTER GOOCHLAND COUNTY 1733-1815 GOOCHLAND WILLS 1728-1745 AND THE FOLLOWING LIST OF NAMES, THAT ARE NOT WILLS, BUT ARE SOME "DEED" OR OTHER TRANSACTION WHERE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE MENTIONED" please include page number with request. keep in mind it's 1728-1745 is the time frame for the list below....... ABRAHAM MICHAUX 1 ANTHONY BENNIN 48 B ANTHONY CALVET 35 ANTHONY HOGGATT 51 ANTHONY JEVODAN 26 ANTHONY MATTOONE 9 ANTHONY RAPINE 1 ARTHUR HOPKINS 31 B BARTHOLOMEW STOVAL 26 BOUTH NAPIER 12 CHARLES ALLEN 13 B CHARLES HULSEY 14 CHARLES JOHNSON 26 CHARLES LINCH 50 CHARLES LYNCH 65 B CHRISTOPHER HUDSON 50 B DANIEL HIX 21 DANIEL PRICE 36 DANIEL STONER 3 DAVID LESEUER 25 B DAVID LILES 43 EDWARD CURD 43.44.46 EDWARD SCOTT 10 EDWARD SCOTT 43 ELIZABETH WRIGHT GEORGE SOUTHERLAND 45 B HENRY ATKINSON 39 B HENRY CARY 75 HENRY REYNOLDS 78 HENRY WEBB 7 HENRY WEBB 55 B HESTER JONES 6 HUMPHRY PARRISH 77 ISAAC ROBINSON 16 B JACOB OGLESBY 28 B JACOB WOODSON 23 JAMES BRYANT 46 B JAMES CHURCHILL 34 B JAMES ROBINSON 32 B JAMES SOBLET 14 B JAMES SPEARS 33 JAMES WADE 68 B JOHN KEY 77 B JOHN MARTIN 27 B JOHN OWN 40 B JOHN PRICE 75 JOHN REDFORD 71 JOHN SANDERS 49.60.61 JOHN SAUNDERS 82 JOHN SCRUGGS 74 B JOHN WEBB 37 B JOHN WILLIAMS 46 B JOHN WINN 17 B JOHN WINN 56 B JOHN WOODSON 6,47 JOHN WOODSON 23.43.57 JONAS LAWSON 63 JOSEPH BALLINGER 65 B JOSEPH BINGLEY 45 JOSEPH BINGLEY 73 JOSEPH CHANDLER 11 B JOSEPH DOBBS 67 B JOSEPH FUGUA 4 JOSEPH PLEASANTS 80 LEONARD BALLOW 24 LUKE WILES 51 B MARMADUKE HICKS/HIX 20.48.51..12 MARTIN KING 57 MARVIL MOSELEY 54 B MATHEW AGEE 1,2 MICHAEL HOLLAND 16 MICHAEL HOLLAND 73 NICHOLAS COX 66 NICHOLAS SOULIE 22 B NOWEL BURTON 36 B PATRICK MULLINS 48 PETER BEURE 32 PETER CHASTAIN 46 PETER CHASTAIN 47 B PETER DEPT. 26 PETER DOEPP 62 PETER DUTOY 42 B PETER FOORD 7.8 RICHARD PARKER 39 B ROBERT CARTER 27 B ROBERT HUGHES 44 ROBERT WOODSON JR. 11 SAMUEL ARRINGTON 13 SAMUEL BURK SR. 20 B SAMUEL BURKS 35 B SAMUEL NUCKOLLS 28 B SAN BURN WOODSON 41 SARAH PARSONS 29 STEPHEN CHASTAIN 28 STEPHEN CHASTAIN 26 B STEPHEN FORSEE 24 STEPHEN HUGHES 34 B STEPHEN MALLET 22 B STEPHEN MALLET 35 B STPEHEN HUGHES 60 B TARLTON WOODSON 38 B THOAMS CHRISTINA 31 THOMAS ELDRIDGE JR. 77 THOMAS LOCKETT 55 THOMAS MURRELL 28 THOMAS MURRELL 69 THOMAS SANDERS 61 THOMAS SAUNDERS 9 B THOMAS STOVALL 49 TIMOTHY RICH 23 B VALENTINE BOSTICK 66 B WARHAM EASELY 56 WILIAM LANSDON 7.14.34.44 WILIAM MILLS 74 WILLIAM ARRINGTON 76 WILLIAM ATTKINSON 41 WILLIAM BARNES 44 B WILLIAM BATTERSBY 67 B WILLIAM COX 76 WILLIAM EASLEY 27 B WILLIAM GAY 77 WILLIAM GRAY 45 B WILLIAM GRAY 77 B WILLIAM MARCHBANKS 37 WILLIAM MATLOCK 21 B WILLIAM MATTOCK 4 B WILLIAM MAXEY 46 WILLIAM MAYO 37 WILLIAM MAYO 72 WILLIAM MILLS 49 WILLIAM RANDOLPH WILLIAM SALLEE 21 B WILLIAM TABOR 49 WILLIAM WAMACK 59 B WILLIAM WOODSON 5 B kristina _www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com_ (http://www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com) --------------------------------- Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars.

Paul, My source did not list the issue, but I found it on Ancestry - Vol VI #1. Pages are not in order, but I was glad to locate the article, though my ancs. not listed. Just learned, too, that many back issues are searchable via Google. As always, I appreciate your help. Doris

Thank you for ALL the Goochland Bingley information. Interesting and useful. I appreciate your sharing "your wealth' of information. Fran

Does anyone have Vol 6, 1968, the Magazine of Va. Genealogy? I'm looking for a copy of the article, "Nansemond, Births from South Quay Baptist Church, 1775-1827." Originals are no longer available. Will gladly pay for same. Thank you. Doris

In a message dated 1/22/2006 3:22:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: PETER FOORD 7.8 ded book 1728 -1734 page 66 peter Foord of king william parish, goochland county gives to his well beloved brother john foord of st. james parish, goochalnd county 150 acres in st. jame sparish, bounded by peter chastain, john jones dated march 17 1728 witness joseph bingley, henry blagrave, jr. benjamin stedain recordd march 18 1728 Judith wife of peter foord relinquishes her dower right. page 78 deed may 12 1729 john foord of st. jaems parish, goochland ocounty planter to jsoeoph bingley of king william parish by his brother peter foord, 150 acres (listed above). witness william lansdon, henry belagrave jr. mathew bingley, esther lansdon recored may 20 1729 anne , wif eo john ford relinquish he dower right page 79 may 12 1729 william lansdon and hester his wife of st. james parish goochland county planter to john foord and stephen foord, so of john, of same planters for l 20, 133 acres in king william parish bounde by stephen renne, capoon, the river, with all housee etc. witness joseph bingley, henry blagrave, jr. matthew bingley, judith bingley recorded may 20 1729 hester wife of lansdon relinquishes her dower right.

In 1715 Job Spearman has a DEVISEE of Thomas Peatross. According to the Law.com library: DEVISEE: n. a person who receives a gift of real property by a will. The distinction between gifts of real property and personal property is actually blurred, so terms like beneficiary or legatee cover those receiving any gift by a will. Is anyone on the list researching the Peatross family? Derrell Oakley Teat

Hi! Several of us cousins have been searching for Peatross information. Our known ancestor Matthew Thom(p)son married a Sarah Wyatt of Caroline Co., Va. It appears that shortly after their marriage they moved to Louisa Co., Va. There is a great deal of information on this Wyatt family on the Internet, but we know little of Matthew Thompson. Due to naming patterns, we feel there is a good chance that Matthew's father was named John Thompson. So, we have searched for all the John Thompsons of the mid 1750's in Caroline and surrounding counties. The closest possibility we have found is a John Thompson who married an Ann Peatross, whose parents were Matthew and Amy Catlett Peatross. They had children John, Matthew, and two daughters in Caroline Co. Information seems hard to come by in Caroline County. Any help would be much appreciated. Ken.

Hi, I am looking for any information that anyone can give me on the following individual: Joshua Carey Born: Feb 1893 in Liberty, Bedford, VA Mother: Ann Unknown Maiden name Father: Stephen Carey Died: Unknown whent and where. Married: Unknown if married or to who. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Anna Adams

>>> HI Kristina. >>> Would like to request the information on HESTER JONES 6 >>> MICHAEL HOLLAND 16, MICHAEL HOLLAND 73. >>> Thank you so much for this kind offer. >>> Jewell Peters. >> FREE GOOCHLAND LOOK UPS OFFERED >> FOR >> DOUGLAS REGISTER >> GOOCHLAND COUNTY 1733-1815 >> GOOCHLAND WILLS 1728-1745 >> >> AND THE FOLLOWING LIST OF NAMES, THAT ARE NOT WILLS, BUT ARE SOME >> "DEED" OR >> OTHER TRANSACTION WHERE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE MENTIONED" please >> include >> page number with request. keep in mind it's 1728-1745 is the time >> frame for the >> list below....... >> ABRAHAM MICHAUX 1 ANTHONY BENNIN 48 B ANTHONY CALVET 35 >> ANTHONY HOGGATT 51 ANTHONY JEVODAN 26 ANTHONY MATTOONE 9 >> ANTHONY RAPINE 1 >> ARTHUR HOPKINS 31 B BARTHOLOMEW STOVAL 26 BOUTH NAPIER >> 12 CHARLES >> ALLEN 13 B CHARLES HULSEY 14 CHARLES JOHNSON 26 CHARLES >> LINCH 50 >> CHARLES LYNCH 65 B CHRISTOPHER HUDSON 50 B DANIEL HIX 21 >> DANIEL PRICE 36 >> DANIEL STONER 3 DAVID LESEUER 25 B DAVID LILES 43 EDWARD >> CURD >> 43.44.46 EDWARD SCOTT 10 EDWARD SCOTT 43 ELIZABETH >> WRIGHT GEORGE >> SOUTHERLAND 45 B HENRY ATKINSON 39 B HENRY CARY 75 HENRY >> REYNOLDS 78 HENRY >> WEBB 7 HENRY WEBB 55 B HESTER JONES 6 HUMPHRY PARRISH 77 >> ISAAC >> ROBINSON 16 B JACOB OGLESBY 28 B JACOB WOODSON 23 JAMES >> BRYANT 46 B JAMES >> CHURCHILL 34 B JAMES ROBINSON 32 B JAMES SOBLET 14 B JAMES >> SPEARS 33 >> JAMES WADE 68 B JOHN KEY 77 B JOHN MARTIN 27 B JOHN OWN 40 >> B JOHN >> PRICE 75 JOHN REDFORD 71 JOHN SANDERS 49.60.61 JOHN SAUNDERS >> 82 JOHN >> SCRUGGS 74 B JOHN WEBB 37 B JOHN WILLIAMS 46 B JOHN WINN 17 >> B JOHN WINN >> 56 B JOHN WOODSON 6,47 JOHN WOODSON 23.43.57 JONAS LAWSON >> 63 JOSEPH >> BALLINGER 65 B JOSEPH BINGLEY 45 JOSEPH BINGLEY 73 JOSEPH >> CHANDLER 11 B >> JOSEPH DOBBS 67 B JOSEPH FUGUA 4 JOSEPH PLEASANTS 80 >> LEONARD BALLOW >> 24 LUKE WILES 51 B MARMADUKE HICKS/HIX 20.48.51..12 MARTIN >> KING 57 >> MARVIL MOSELEY 54 B MATHEW AGEE 1,2 MICHAEL HOLLAND 16 >> MICHAEL HOLLAND >> 73 NICHOLAS COX 66 NICHOLAS SOULIE 22 B NOWEL BURTON 36 B >> PATRICK >> MULLINS 48 PETER BEURE 32 PETER CHASTAIN 46 PETER CHASTAIN >> 47 B PETER >> DEPT. 26 PETER DOEPP 62 PETER DUTOY 42 B PETER FOORD 7.8 >> RICHARD >> PARKER 39 B ROBERT CARTER 27 B ROBERT HUGHES 44 ROBERT >> WOODSON JR. 11 >> SAMUEL ARRINGTON 13 SAMUEL BURK SR. 20 B SAMUEL BURKS 35 B >> SAMUEL >> NUCKOLLS 28 B SAN BURN WOODSON 41 SARAH PARSONS 29 STEPHEN >> CHASTAIN 28 >> STEPHEN CHASTAIN 26 B STEPHEN FORSEE 24 STEPHEN HUGHES 34 B >> STEPHEN >> MALLET 22 B STEPHEN MALLET 35 B STPEHEN HUGHES 60 B TARLTON >> WOODSON 38 B >> THOAMS CHRISTINA 31 THOMAS ELDRIDGE JR. 77 THOMAS LOCKETT >> 55 THOMAS >> MURRELL 28 THOMAS MURRELL 69 THOMAS SANDERS 61 THOMAS >> SAUNDERS 9 B >> THOMAS STOVALL 49 TIMOTHY RICH 23 B VALENTINE BOSTICK 66 B >> WARHAM EASELY >> 56 WILIAM LANSDON 7.14.34.44 WILIAM MILLS 74 WILLIAM >> ARRINGTON 76 >> WILLIAM ATTKINSON 41 WILLIAM BARNES 44 B WILLIAM BATTERSBY 67 >> B WILLIAM >> COX 76 WILLIAM EASLEY 27 B WILLIAM GAY 77 WILLIAM GRAY 45 >> B WILLIAM >> GRAY 77 B WILLIAM MARCHBANKS 37 WILLIAM MATLOCK 21 B WILLIAM >> MATTOCK 4 B >> WILLIAM MAXEY 46 WILLIAM MAYO 37 WILLIAM MAYO 72 WILLIAM >> MILLS 49 >> WILLIAM RANDOLPH WILLIAM SALLEE 21 B WILLIAM TABOR 49 >> WILLIAM >> WAMACK 59 B WILLIAM WOODSON 5 B >> >> >> kristina >> _www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com_ (http:// >> www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com/) >> >> >> >> >> ============================== >> Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. >> Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: >> http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx >> > > > ============================== > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx >

Kristina When you can, please Bartholomew Stovall 26 Charles lynch 50 & 65B Henry Cary 75 Edward Curd 43/44/46 JAMES SOBLET 14 B Thank you for your acts of Kindness Karen -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [VAROOTS] GOOCHLAND REVISTED............ FREE GOOCHLAND LOOK UPS OFFERED FOR DOUGLAS REGISTER GOOCHLAND COUNTY 1733-1815 GOOCHLAND WILLS 1728-1745 AND THE FOLLOWING LIST OF NAMES, THAT ARE NOT WILLS, BUT ARE SOME "DEED" OR OTHER TRANSACTION WHERE OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS ARE MENTIONED" please include page number with request. keep in mind it's 1728-1745 is the time frame for the list below....... ABRAHAM MICHAUX 1 ANTHONY BENNIN 48 B ANTHONY CALVET 35 ANTHONY HOGGATT 51 ANTHONY JEVODAN 26 ANTHONY MATTOONE 9 ANTHONY RAPINE 1 ARTHUR HOPKINS 31 B BARTHOLOMEW STOVAL 26 BOUTH NAPIER 12 CHARLES ALLEN 13 B CHARLES HULSEY 14 CHARLES JOHNSON 26 CHARLES LINCH 50 CHARLES LYNCH 65 B CHRISTOPHER HUDSON 50 B DANIEL HIX 21 DANIEL PRICE 36 DANIEL STONER 3 DAVID LESEUER 25 B DAVID LILES 43 EDWARD CURD 43.44.46 EDWARD SCOTT 10 EDWARD SCOTT 43 ELIZABETH WRIGHT GEORGE SOUTHERLAND 45 B HENRY ATKINSON 39 B HENRY CARY 75 HENRY REYNOLDS 78 HENRY WEBB 7 HENRY WEBB 55 B HESTER JONES 6 HUMPHRY PARRISH 77 ISAAC ROBINSON 16 B JACOB OGLESBY 28 B JACOB WOODSON 23 JAMES BRYANT 46 B JAMES CHURCHILL 34 B JAMES ROBINSON 32 B JAMES SOBLET 14 B JAMES SPEARS 33 JAMES WADE 68 B JOHN KEY 77 B JOHN MARTIN 27 B JOHN OWN 40 B JOHN PRICE 75 JOHN REDFORD 71 JOHN SANDERS 49.60.61 JOHN SAUNDERS 82 JOHN SCRUGGS 74 B JOHN WEBB 37 B JOHN WILLIAMS 46 B JOHN WINN 17 B JOHN WINN 56 B JOHN WOODSON 6,47 JOHN WOODSON 23.43.57 JONAS LAWSON 63 JOSEPH BALLINGER 65 B JOSEPH BINGLEY 45 JOSEPH BINGLEY 73 JOSEPH CHANDLER 11 B JOSEPH DOBBS 67 B JOSEPH FUGUA 4 JOSEPH PLEASANTS 80 LEONARD BALLOW 24 LUKE WILES 51 B MARMADUKE HICKS/HIX 20.48.51..12 MARTIN KING 57 MARVIL MOSELEY 54 B MATHEW AGEE 1,2 MICHAEL HOLLAND 16 MICHAEL HOLLAND 73 NICHOLAS COX 66 NICHOLAS SOULIE 22 B NOWEL BURTON 36 B PATRICK MULLINS 48 PETER BEURE 32 PETER CHASTAIN 46 PETER CHASTAIN 47 B PETER DEPT. 26 PETER DOEPP 62 PETER DUTOY 42 B PETER FOORD 7.8 RICHARD PARKER 39 B ROBERT CARTER 27 B ROBERT HUGHES 44 ROBERT WOODSON JR. 11 SAMUEL ARRINGTON 13 SAMUEL BURK SR. 20 B SAMUEL BURKS 35 B SAMUEL NUCKOLLS 28 B SAN BURN WOODSON 41 SARAH PARSONS 29 STEPHEN CHASTAIN 28 STEPHEN CHASTAIN 26 B STEPHEN FORSEE 24 STEPHEN HUGHES 34 B STEPHEN MALLET 22 B STEPHEN MALLET 35 B STPEHEN HUGHES 60 B TARLTON WOODSON 38 B THOAMS CHRISTINA 31 THOMAS ELDRIDGE JR. 77 THOMAS LOCKETT 55 THOMAS MURRELL 28 THOMAS MURRELL 69 THOMAS SANDERS 61 THOMAS SAUNDERS 9 B THOMAS STOVALL 49 TIMOTHY RICH 23 B VALENTINE BOSTICK 66 B WARHAM EASELY 56 WILIAM LANSDON 7.14.34.44 WILIAM MILLS 74 WILLIAM ARRINGTON 76 WILLIAM ATTKINSON 41 WILLIAM BARNES 44 B WILLIAM BATTERSBY 67 B WILLIAM COX 76 WILLIAM EASLEY 27 B WILLIAM GAY 77 WILLIAM GRAY 45 B WILLIAM GRAY 77 B WILLIAM MARCHBANKS 37 WILLIAM MATLOCK 21 B WILLIAM MATTOCK 4 B WILLIAM MAXEY 46 WILLIAM MAYO 37 WILLIAM MAYO 72 WILLIAM MILLS 49 WILLIAM RANDOLPH WILLIAM SALLEE 21 B WILLIAM TABOR 49 WILLIAM WAMACK 59 B WILLIAM WOODSON 5 B kristina _www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com_ (http://www.nyvagenealogy.homestead.com) ============================== Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death Records. New content added every business day. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx