> Could you tell us how, exactly, to get to this clip? > I went to the website, but couldn't find the Citie of Henricus clip....but > thoroughly enjoyed a clip on dairy farms in Henrico! > DFM Try this link... http://www.discoverrichmond.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD/MGArticle/RTD_DRMGArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1149189112125&path=!mediatours&parentid=1149190167459 . The link ends with "7459". Because of its length, and some email clients don't handle long links well, you may need to copy and paste it into your browser. The Henricus video and photos are in the box titled "More Slideshows." David
Could you tell us how, exactly, to get to this clip? I went to the website, but couldn't find the Citie of Henricus clip....but thoroughly enjoyed a clip on dairy farms in Henrico! DFM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sunshine49" <shengirl@verizon.net> To: <vahenric@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:25 PM Subject: [VAHENRIC] Citie of Henricus > talk about timing- go to http://www.timesdispatch.com they have a > slide show tour of the recreated "Citie of Henricus," and a brief bit > of its history. > > Nancy > > ------- > I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days. > > --Daniel Boone > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
I will purchase one 12 marker DNA test for a documented descendant of Henry Anderson of Virginia who was born about 1680. This Henry Anderson married Prudence Stratton of Henrico County, Virginia in about 1706. In 1717 this Henry Anderson purchased 500 acres in Henrico County on the North side of Appomattox River. This Henry Anderson was Justice of the Peace for Henrico County in 1719 and Sheriff in 1729. The person to be tested must be a male with an Anderson surname. The person to be tested must be able to show a documented direct line to the above Henry Anderson. Our Anderson line has a paper trail to the above Henry Anderson. We would like to confirm that connection with a DNA match. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated. Paul K. Anderson, Jr. PO Box 2073 Rocky Face, GA 30740 706 275 0879 pka@optilink.us
talk about timing- go to http://www.timesdispatch.com they have a slide show tour of the recreated "Citie of Henricus," and a brief bit of its history. Nancy ------- I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days. --Daniel Boone
I had read that she seemed to have had a brief marriage before. This might have been mostly ceremonial or a betrothal or something, as she was around 11 or 12 when the English arrived. She was, tho, kidnapped at one point by the English and held in the fort at Jamestown, I believe it was while John Smith and other leaders were away, and the men left behind got pretty out of control. Her story is very complex, "The New World" is the only movie I've seen that really goes into it all. Eventually her father disowned her, after her helping the English so much and the English raids and depradations, and sent her to live with her mother's people, the Potawomack Indians on the Rappahannock River. She was later traded for a copper pot and brought back to Jamestown by the English. I don't know if her father ever saw her again after he banished her to the Potawomack. But when he heard of her death, he removed himself to a village as far as he could get from the whites and died a year or so later; he obviously still loved her greatly to the end. Nancy ------- Outside our doors and windows there is a gift that is a million gifts - the gift of Creation. On Oct 3, 2006, at 10:44 PM, Bob Juch wrote: > Anita, > > Pocahontas certainly wasn't kidnapped. She was given in marriage > by her > father, the chief of the Powhatans, just as European royalty arranged > marriages between their children to form alliances. > > She may or may not have been asked how she felt about it, but I'm > sure her > tribe accepted that as business as usual. > > Do you have the citation for her being married before? > > Bob Juch > http://www.Juch.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: vahenric-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:vahenric- > bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of alani2@yahoo.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 6:18 PM > To: vahenric@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [VAHENRIC] St. Mary's Cemetery:: Richmond, Va. > > > I was reading on one site, that Pocahontas was married > to a Native before being kidnapped. Most of the > accounts given about Pocahontas are from the European perspective. > There are > no accountings from the Natives themselves as to how they felt, > when one of > their own was taken. > > Anita > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message
Anita, Pocahontas certainly wasn't kidnapped. She was given in marriage by her father, the chief of the Powhatans, just as European royalty arranged marriages between their children to form alliances. She may or may not have been asked how she felt about it, but I'm sure her tribe accepted that as business as usual. Do you have the citation for her being married before? Bob Juch http://www.Juch.org -----Original Message----- From: vahenric-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:vahenric-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of alani2@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 6:18 PM To: vahenric@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [VAHENRIC] St. Mary's Cemetery:: Richmond, Va. I was reading on one site, that Pocahontas was married to a Native before being kidnapped. Most of the accounts given about Pocahontas are from the European perspective. There are no accountings from the Natives themselves as to how they felt, when one of their own was taken. Anita
We are all speculating on how Pocahontas felt. The only account taken into consideration is the European account. It is the height of arrogance to speak for someone else (This still goes on today, with Bush on TV speaking for the people of Iraq). Do you think that the Royal family in England does not promise their children in marriage? Why would it be any different for Pocahontas? Everyone wants to believe in fairy tales and happy endings. I certainly do not believe that the Indians gave away their daughters, or sold them into slavery. A marriage union was a means of continuity for the tribe. I posted a link to the Powhatans, who know more about Matoeka (who you call Pocahontas), then Walt Disney. Anita Here are two links with views on Pocahontas. Pocahontas: Icon At The Crossroads Of Race And Sex: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~cap/POCA/POC-home.html The Pocahontas Myth: http://www.powhatan.org/pocc.html --- Bob Juch <bob@juch.org> wrote: > Anita, > > Pocahontas certainly wasn't kidnapped. She was > given in marriage by her > father, the chief of the Powhatans, just as European > royalty arranged > marriages between their children to form alliances. > > She may or may not have been asked how she felt > about it, but I'm sure her > tribe accepted that as business as usual. > > Do you have the citation for her being married > before? > > Bob Juch > http://www.Juch.org > > > -----Original Message----- > From: vahenric-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:vahenric-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of alani2@yahoo.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 6:18 PM > To: vahenric@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [VAHENRIC] St. Mary's Cemetery:: > Richmond, Va. > > > I was reading on one site, that Pocahontas was > married > to a Native before being kidnapped. Most of the > accounts given about Pocahontas are from the > European perspective. There are > no accountings from the Natives themselves as to how > they felt, when one of > their own was taken. > > Anita > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message >
A short history of St John's Episcopal Church, Richmond, Va. _St. John's Episcopal Church - Richmond, Virginia--_ (http://www.historicstjohnschurch.org/pages/history.htm#toppage) The cemetery that surrounds St. John's belongs to the city. It was the only public cemetery in Richmond for a time. The next cemetery was Shockoe and the next was Oakwood. Hope this helps. C. Terry
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: WORSHAM, LITTLEBERRY, KENNEN Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/WBC.2ACI/2903 Message Board Post: Seeking connections, additions, corrections, comments regarding the following family: 1-William John WORSHAM +Elizabeth LITTLEBERRY/BURY b: 1623 in England or Henrico County, VA d: Oct 1678 in Bermuda Hundred, Henrico, VA . 2-Elizabeth WORSHAM b: 1656 in Chesterfield, VA d: 1705 in Conjurer's Neck, Henrico, VA . +Doctor Richard KENNEN b: 1650 in Conjurer's Neck, Henrico, VA m: 1673 in , Henrico, VA d: 20 Aug 1696 in , Henrico, VA Laura Koehn bradlara@sbcglobal.net
I also think it might not be wise to think of these native young women as captives held against their will and forced to marry the English. There might have been a few, but probably most weren't. Consider in native cultures it was a common and accepted practice for someone from one tribe to be captured (in war or kidnapping) and brought to live with another tribe, many times to replace a son or daughter who had died or been killed in a war. Sometimes they may have been harshly treated as slaves, but many times they were adopted into a new family and well treated. They accepted this, lived with and married into their new family and tribe. So to these young women, it really wasn't an alien practice. Nancy ------- I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days. --Daniel Boone On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Sunshine49 wrote: > she actually wasn't that unique in terms of marrying the white > colonists, it was pretty common (my own ancestor was a Powhatan girl > named Anna Little Flower) but she made such an impact because of her > position as the favored daughter of an important chief. She could and > did aid the English in ways no one else could, and John Rolfe was > from a very wealthy and prominent family, so that gave her entry to > the court in England, which most native women marrying most white > settlers would never be able to do. > > Nancy. > > ------- > The alchemy of a changing life is the only truth. > > -Rumi > > > On Oct 3, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Alice Warner wrote: > >> At the same time, equating someone who was essentially a peace >> blessing >> between two peoples to meaning that every native could be treated in >> such a fashion is not a good analogy. >> The reason we know Pocahontas is largely because of her uniqueness. >> >> >> Maraudermn@aol.com wrote: >>> Hi: >>> >>> Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April 5, 1614 at the >>> Jamestown >>> Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, who sent an envoy >>> to the wedding. >>> >>> Bernie >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- >>> request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- >> request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message
that's interesting about Rolfe marriage-- what is the documentation for it being there?
I am learning from everyone here. Please don't take my accounting as gospal, it is just what I got out of different sites I read. I believe I said my understanding was, or something to that effect. This is a very informative thread, and please keep the information flowing. I have been on this list quite a while and this is the first time I have really paid attention to a thread. I am just going to take it all in (smile). Anita --- Sunshine49 <shengirl@verizon.net> wrote: > this is the mistake- it is the Henricus church, > which was at the fort > of Henricus, not at the present location of St. > John's Church on > Church Hill in Richmond. St. John's wasn't > established till the early > 1700s, it could not have been the same minister > anyway. Henrico > County was also named for this prince Henry, so it > might be > confusing. If you are speaking of mulattos buried at > the Henricus > Church, which could very well be, it is probably now > dug away by the > quarrying operation. In the early days of settlement > it is estimated > that 40% of the male colonists married native women. > There was a huge > shortage of women in the colony early on, and a very > high death rate > for those who did come. So there were many mullattos > at the time, tho > I am not sure they were all called that. I doubt > John Rolfe and > Pocahontas's son was called that. Of course, in some > later documents > anyone who was of mixed ancestry, black or native, > was called > "colored." You don't say where you are or if you > have ever visited > St. John's Church, but the burial ground is very > small, no room for > sections anyway. > > Nancy > > ------- > Living is an ongoing imperfection. > > -Sara Lukinson > > > > On Oct 3, 2006, at 12:51 PM, alani2@yahoo.com wrote: > > > I was reading from the The Historic St. Johns site > > was stated the Reverend Whittaker baptised > Pocahontas. > > He was Rector of Saint Johns, so I assumed he > married > > her there (my mistake). Anyway, I am not trying to > > change the discussion focus. My point was that the > > church had members who were Mulatto (Native), and > may > > have had a cemetery on the grounds (albeit > seperate), > > for these members. I guess it should be a > question. > > Would they have had a seperate graveyard on Church > > grounds for non whites? > > > > Also, does anyone know of a Lewis cemetery in > > Richmond? > > > > "The Reverend Alexander Whittaker was appointed > rector > > for this first Henricus church. Whittaker gained > fame > > as the minister who baptized Pocahontas, giving > her > > the Christian name of Rebecca, and who married her > to > > John Rolfe in 1614. In 1617 Whittaker drowned in > the > > James River. His associate William Wickham held > the > > Parish Church together, awaiting the arrival from > > England of the Reverend Thomas Bargrave in 1619." > > > > Historica St. Johns Church Site: > > > http://www.historicstjohnschurch.org/pages/history.htm > > > > Anita Wills > > --- Maraudermn@aol.com wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April > 5, > >> 1614 at the Jamestown > >> Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, > who > >> sent an envoy to the wedding. > >> > >> Bernie > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an > email > >> to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word > >> 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject > and > >> the body of the message > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to VAHENRIC- > > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes > > in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > BARNES & NOBLE ONLINE PURCHASE - NOTES AND DOCUMENTS OF FREE PERSONS OF COLOR: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=9v5Ox3pAni&isbn=1411603338&itm=1 Purchase Site for Tape of Anita Wills on Book TV: http://www.c-spanstore.org/shop/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=188914-1 I want to know what sustains you from the inside when all else falls away. ~ Oriah Mountain Dreamer~ CREE INDIAN PROPHECY: ONLY AFTER THE LAST TREE HAS BEEN CUT DOWN, ONLY AFTER THE LAST RIVER HAS BEEN POISONED, ONLY AFTER THE LAST FISH HAS BEEN CAUGHT, ONLY THEN WILL YOU FIND THAT MONEY CANNOT BE EATEN.
she actually wasn't that unique in terms of marrying the white colonists, it was pretty common (my own ancestor was a Powhatan girl named Anna Little Flower) but she made such an impact because of her position as the favored daughter of an important chief. She could and did aid the English in ways no one else could, and John Rolfe was from a very wealthy and prominent family, so that gave her entry to the court in England, which most native women marrying most white settlers would never be able to do. Nancy. ------- The alchemy of a changing life is the only truth. -Rumi On Oct 3, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Alice Warner wrote: > At the same time, equating someone who was essentially a peace > blessing > between two peoples to meaning that every native could be treated in > such a fashion is not a good analogy. > The reason we know Pocahontas is largely because of her uniqueness. > > > Maraudermn@aol.com wrote: >> Hi: >> >> Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April 5, 1614 at the >> Jamestown >> Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, who sent an envoy >> to the wedding. >> >> Bernie >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- >> request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message
I was reading on one site, that Pocahontas was married to a Native before being kidnapped. Most of the accounts given about Pocahontas are from the European perspective. There are no accountings from the Natives themselves as to how they felt, when one of their own was taken. Anita --- Sunshine49 <shengirl@verizon.net> wrote: > I also think it might not be wise to think of these > native young > women as captives held against their will and forced > to marry the > English. There might have been a few, but probably > most weren't. > Consider in native cultures it was a common and > accepted practice for > someone from one tribe to be captured (in war or > kidnapping) and > brought to live with another tribe, many times to > replace a son or > daughter who had died or been killed in a war. > Sometimes they may > have been harshly treated as slaves, but many times > they were adopted > into a new family and well treated. They accepted > this, lived with > and married into their new family and tribe. So to > these young women, > it really wasn't an alien practice. > > Nancy > > ------- > I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for > three days. > > --Daniel Boone > > > > On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Sunshine49 wrote: > > > she actually wasn't that unique in terms of > marrying the white > > colonists, it was pretty common (my own ancestor > was a Powhatan girl > > named Anna Little Flower) but she made such an > impact because of her > > position as the favored daughter of an important > chief. She could and > > did aid the English in ways no one else could, and > John Rolfe was > > from a very wealthy and prominent family, so that > gave her entry to > > the court in England, which most native women > marrying most white > > settlers would never be able to do. > > > > Nancy. > > > > ------- > > The alchemy of a changing life is the only truth. > > > > -Rumi > > > > > > On Oct 3, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Alice Warner wrote: > > > >> At the same time, equating someone who was > essentially a peace > >> blessing > >> between two peoples to meaning that every native > could be treated in > >> such a fashion is not a good analogy. > >> The reason we know Pocahontas is largely because > of her uniqueness. > >> > >> > >> Maraudermn@aol.com wrote: > >>> Hi: > >>> > >>> Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April > 5, 1614 at the > >>> Jamestown > >>> Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, > who sent an envoy > >>> to the wedding. > >>> > >>> Bernie > >>> > >>> ------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an > email to VAHENRIC- > >>> request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the > >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the > message > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an > email to VAHENRIC- > >> request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes > >> in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to VAHENRIC- > > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes > > in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > BARNES & NOBLE ONLINE PURCHASE - NOTES AND DOCUMENTS OF FREE PERSONS OF COLOR: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=9v5Ox3pAni&isbn=1411603338&itm=1 Purchase Site for Tape of Anita Wills on Book TV: http://www.c-spanstore.org/shop/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=188914-1 I want to know what sustains you from the inside when all else falls away. ~ Oriah Mountain Dreamer~ CREE INDIAN PROPHECY: ONLY AFTER THE LAST TREE HAS BEEN CUT DOWN, ONLY AFTER THE LAST RIVER HAS BEEN POISONED, ONLY AFTER THE LAST FISH HAS BEEN CAUGHT, ONLY THEN WILL YOU FIND THAT MONEY CANNOT BE EATEN.
this is the mistake- it is the Henricus church, which was at the fort of Henricus, not at the present location of St. John's Church on Church Hill in Richmond. St. John's wasn't established till the early 1700s, it could not have been the same minister anyway. Henrico County was also named for this prince Henry, so it might be confusing. If you are speaking of mulattos buried at the Henricus Church, which could very well be, it is probably now dug away by the quarrying operation. In the early days of settlement it is estimated that 40% of the male colonists married native women. There was a huge shortage of women in the colony early on, and a very high death rate for those who did come. So there were many mullattos at the time, tho I am not sure they were all called that. I doubt John Rolfe and Pocahontas's son was called that. Of course, in some later documents anyone who was of mixed ancestry, black or native, was called "colored." You don't say where you are or if you have ever visited St. John's Church, but the burial ground is very small, no room for sections anyway. Nancy ------- Living is an ongoing imperfection. -Sara Lukinson On Oct 3, 2006, at 12:51 PM, alani2@yahoo.com wrote: > I was reading from the The Historic St. Johns site > was stated the Reverend Whittaker baptised Pocahontas. > He was Rector of Saint Johns, so I assumed he married > her there (my mistake). Anyway, I am not trying to > change the discussion focus. My point was that the > church had members who were Mulatto (Native), and may > have had a cemetery on the grounds (albeit seperate), > for these members. I guess it should be a question. > Would they have had a seperate graveyard on Church > grounds for non whites? > > Also, does anyone know of a Lewis cemetery in > Richmond? > > "The Reverend Alexander Whittaker was appointed rector > for this first Henricus church. Whittaker gained fame > as the minister who baptized Pocahontas, giving her > the Christian name of Rebecca, and who married her to > John Rolfe in 1614. In 1617 Whittaker drowned in the > James River. His associate William Wickham held the > Parish Church together, awaiting the arrival from > England of the Reverend Thomas Bargrave in 1619." > > Historica St. Johns Church Site: > http://www.historicstjohnschurch.org/pages/history.htm > > Anita Wills > --- Maraudermn@aol.com wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April 5, >> 1614 at the Jamestown >> Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, who >> sent an envoy to the wedding. >> >> Bernie >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email >> to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word >> 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and >> the body of the message >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message
St. John's didn't exist when Pocahontas was married. It might have been at the church at Jamestown, or the settlement of Henricus, farther up the James River toward Richmond, which was wiped out in the massacre of 1622. There is a recreated fort and native village, etc. there now, her husband John Rolfe lived in the vicinity; the original location is lost, it was dug up during quarrying operations some years ago. I don't know if there were freedmen's cemeteries in the Richmond area in the early 1800s, there were a lot of free blacks living in the city. If they weren't free, then they were buried on the master's plantation or farm. Nancy ------- I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days. --Daniel Boone On Oct 3, 2006, at 12:11 PM, alani2@yahoo.com wrote: > That is what I thought as well, but my understanding > was that Pocahontas was married at St. Johns in > Richnmond. I have Native ancestors (who were listed as > Mulatto), and belonged to the Episcopal Church during > Colonial Times. I do not know if they were buried > there (Lewis is only one of my family surnames), but > they were Christians. > > Anita > > --- Sunshine49 <shengirl@verizon.net> wrote: > >> sorry, back in those days- and even till recently- >> there were >> separate cemeteries for persons of color. Very often >> back then, tho, >> even for whites, they were buried on the family >> property, even if it >> was within the city. A minority of residents were >> buried at St. >> John's, and of course you had to be Anglican, and a >> member of the >> congregation, it was not a public cemetery. >> >> Nancy >> >> ------- >> Believe those who seek the truth; >> Doubt those who find it. >> >> -Andre Gide >> >> >> >> On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:30 AM, alani2@yahoo.com wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know if there were seperate cemeteries >> for >>> persons of color. My ancestor resided in Richmond >> and >>> Henrico County, and died around 1800. He lived in >> the >>> area of Rocketts Landing. I am trying to find a >>> cemetery he and the rest of the family may be >> buried >>> in. He is listed as Mulatto in the census records >> for >>> Henrico and Richmond (1783-1800). I am looking for >> a >>> Lewis family cemetery in Henrico and/or Richmond. >> He >>> may also be buried at St. Johns in Richmond. >>> >>> Anita >>> >>> --- quickcrunch@aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to >>>> this mailing list. >>>> >>>> Classification: Query >>>> >>>> Message Board URL: >>>> >>>> >>> >> > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/WBC.2ACI/2348.2.1.1.1 >>>> >>>> Message Board Post: >>>> >>>> ATT: Shari >>>> Thanks for sharing your research. Could you give >> a >>>> timeline for the oldest gravesites. If back into >> the >>>> mid to late 1700s, do you have >> BALLENGER/BALLINGER >>>> or WADE? >>>> Aileen in WA >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an >> email >>>> to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word >>>> 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject >> and >>>> the body of the message >>>> >>> >>> >>> BARNES & NOBLE ONLINE PURCHASE - NOTES AND >> DOCUMENTS OF FREE >>> PERSONS OF COLOR: >> http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ >>> >> > isbnInquiry.asp?userid=9v5Ox3pAni&isbn=1411603338&itm=1 >>> >>> Purchase Site for Tape of Anita Wills on Book TV: >>> http://www.c-spanstore.org/shop/index.php? >>> main_page=product_video_info&products_id=188914-1 >>> >>> I want to know what sustains you from the inside >> when all >>> else falls away. >>> ~ Oriah Mountain Dreamer~ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> CREE INDIAN PROPHECY: >>> >>> ONLY AFTER THE LAST TREE HAS BEEN CUT DOWN, >>> ONLY AFTER THE LAST RIVER HAS BEEN POISONED, >>> ONLY AFTER THE LAST FISH HAS BEEN CAUGHT, >>> ONLY THEN WILL YOU FIND THAT MONEY CANNOT BE >> EATEN. >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email >> to VAHENRIC- >>> request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes >>> in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email >> to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word >> 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and >> the body of the message >> > > > BARNES & NOBLE ONLINE PURCHASE - NOTES AND DOCUMENTS OF FREE > PERSONS OF COLOR: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ > isbnInquiry.asp?userid=9v5Ox3pAni&isbn=1411603338&itm=1 > > Purchase Site for Tape of Anita Wills on Book TV: > http://www.c-spanstore.org/shop/index.php? > main_page=product_video_info&products_id=188914-1 > > I want to know what sustains you from the inside when all > else falls away. > ~ Oriah Mountain Dreamer~ > > > > > > CREE INDIAN PROPHECY: > > ONLY AFTER THE LAST TREE HAS BEEN CUT DOWN, > ONLY AFTER THE LAST RIVER HAS BEEN POISONED, > ONLY AFTER THE LAST FISH HAS BEEN CAUGHT, > ONLY THEN WILL YOU FIND THAT MONEY CANNOT BE EATEN. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message
At the same time, equating someone who was essentially a peace blessing between two peoples to meaning that every native could be treated in such a fashion is not a good analogy. The reason we know Pocahontas is largely because of her uniqueness. Maraudermn@aol.com wrote: > Hi: > > Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April 5, 1614 at the Jamestown > Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, who sent an envoy to the wedding. > > Bernie > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >
Hi: Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April 5, 1614 at the Jamestown Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, who sent an envoy to the wedding. Bernie
sorry, back in those days- and even till recently- there were separate cemeteries for persons of color. Very often back then, tho, even for whites, they were buried on the family property, even if it was within the city. A minority of residents were buried at St. John's, and of course you had to be Anglican, and a member of the congregation, it was not a public cemetery. Nancy ------- Believe those who seek the truth; Doubt those who find it. -Andre Gide On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:30 AM, alani2@yahoo.com wrote: > Does anyone know if there were seperate cemeteries for > persons of color. My ancestor resided in Richmond and > Henrico County, and died around 1800. He lived in the > area of Rocketts Landing. I am trying to find a > cemetery he and the rest of the family may be buried > in. He is listed as Mulatto in the census records for > Henrico and Richmond (1783-1800). I am looking for a > Lewis family cemetery in Henrico and/or Richmond. He > may also be buried at St. Johns in Richmond. > > Anita > > --- quickcrunch@aol.com wrote: > >> This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to >> this mailing list. >> >> Classification: Query >> >> Message Board URL: >> >> > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/WBC.2ACI/2348.2.1.1.1 >> >> Message Board Post: >> >> ATT: Shari >> Thanks for sharing your research. Could you give a >> timeline for the oldest gravesites. If back into the >> mid to late 1700s, do you have BALLENGER/BALLINGER >> or WADE? >> Aileen in WA >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email >> to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word >> 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and >> the body of the message >> > > > BARNES & NOBLE ONLINE PURCHASE - NOTES AND DOCUMENTS OF FREE > PERSONS OF COLOR: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ > isbnInquiry.asp?userid=9v5Ox3pAni&isbn=1411603338&itm=1 > > Purchase Site for Tape of Anita Wills on Book TV: > http://www.c-spanstore.org/shop/index.php? > main_page=product_video_info&products_id=188914-1 > > I want to know what sustains you from the inside when all > else falls away. > ~ Oriah Mountain Dreamer~ > > > > > > CREE INDIAN PROPHECY: > > ONLY AFTER THE LAST TREE HAS BEEN CUT DOWN, > ONLY AFTER THE LAST RIVER HAS BEEN POISONED, > ONLY AFTER THE LAST FISH HAS BEEN CAUGHT, > ONLY THEN WILL YOU FIND THAT MONEY CANNOT BE EATEN. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VAHENRIC- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message
The point I was attempting to make was that some natives were members of the Episcopalian Church. There was an edict passed that stated Natives were to be converted to Christianity. The other point I was making is that my ancestors who were Mulatto, were members of the Episcopalian Church. I at no time stated that all Natives were Christians, or encouraged to be. Anita --- Alice Warner <embryproject@gmail.com> wrote: > At the same time, equating someone who was > essentially a peace blessing > between two peoples to meaning that every native > could be treated in > such a fashion is not a good analogy. > The reason we know Pocahontas is largely because of > her uniqueness. > > > Maraudermn@aol.com wrote: > > Hi: > > > > Pocahontas and John Rolfe were married on April 5, > 1614 at the Jamestown > > Anglican Church with the blessing of Powhatan, who > sent an envoy to the wedding. > > > > Bernie > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to VAHENRIC-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > BARNES & NOBLE ONLINE PURCHASE - NOTES AND DOCUMENTS OF FREE PERSONS OF COLOR: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=9v5Ox3pAni&isbn=1411603338&itm=1 Purchase Site for Tape of Anita Wills on Book TV: http://www.c-spanstore.org/shop/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=188914-1 I want to know what sustains you from the inside when all else falls away. ~ Oriah Mountain Dreamer~ CREE INDIAN PROPHECY: ONLY AFTER THE LAST TREE HAS BEEN CUT DOWN, ONLY AFTER THE LAST RIVER HAS BEEN POISONED, ONLY AFTER THE LAST FISH HAS BEEN CAUGHT, ONLY THEN WILL YOU FIND THAT MONEY CANNOT BE EATEN.