You can put me on record as being opposed to both of the amendments. The reason for opposing the first is that I don't want anyone telling me I can't put my pages on xxxxxx server because there are already too many pages there. I want to be free to choose for myself. I also oppose the second amendment. It is rather confusing and appears to be trying to kill two birds with one stone. If I'm following correctly, I can understand how we would want to clearly state that "ownership" of the queries, obits and whatnot are not to revert to GenConnect (because I can't think any other example) simply because their forms or whatever were used for the input. I guess if it stood by itself, I would support that. But, since it stands on file with a statement saying that links to outside sources are "strongly discouraged" I have to oppose it. If there is a good page online that relates to my counties, I'm going to link to it, regardless of whether or not it's part of the project. So long as it is respectible and relates, why shouldn't I? Tracy