daisyoday wrote: > > Did I miss something here? What does porn have to do with the USGenweb > sites? I read this as an example. I can't imagine that any volunteer with > the US Genweb would have "porn" on their pages. Isn't this proposal a > result of the delinking by the NC of the original USGenweb Census project > without a vote? > Dodie, that's one of my reasons. If this wording had been in the by-laws, the "delinking by the NC" could have been temporary, giving the the offender time to bring the site into compliance. "Porn" was an example in my message, not included in the proposal, because that was the example given to me by one of our board reps. Linda