Greetings all, The question in front of us at the moment is whether VAGenWeb should join in sponsoring one or more of the amendments in order to get it/them placed before the membership for a vote up or down. According to the by laws, it takes five states' sponsorship to get them considered. Regards, Freddie S. > I would vote to support the one amendment that is titled " USGenWeb > Archives", but not the other two. The one referred to as "States Rights" > should be called "Kill the USGenWeb Project as we know it now." > > The "Archives" amendment corrects some bad verbage in the bylaws. It > refers to the USGenWeb Archives as "USGenWeb Project Archives", for > instance. It would also eliminate two board reps and hopefully > eliminate any concerns that the Archives has too many representatives on > the USGenWeb Advisory Board. > > Freddie.. if you're counting: <G> > > Recall of Board Members: NO > States Rights: NO > USGenWeb Archives: YES > > Linda > >