Hi Pat,   Craig wants  my report from Family Tree Maker .. "off list"... so he can use it for others. Craig knows very well I can't send attachments to this list. I have eleven  pages of records on just one grandfather let alone the rest of them. Craig can do his own work.   Thanks for your comments. :)   Marianne Dillow --- On Tue, 1/6/09, Haynes, Patricia A. <phaynes@fulbright.com> wrote: From: Haynes, Patricia A. <phaynes@fulbright.com> Subject: Re: [VACULPEP] It's all relative To: vaculpep@rootsweb.com, "Craig Kilby" <persisto@earthlink.net> Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 1:51 PM Maybe I missed something in this discussion, but I don't recall anyone actually saying they descend from William the Conqueror, so I don't know why you keep bringing it up. Sure it's probably hypothetical, but what's the point of referring to it over and over? I agree that evidence is credible or it isn't, but perhaps it's not what you are saying, but HOW you are saying it. You can be rather dismissive in your tone when replying. Nothing personal, just an observation. I also observe that you like to have the last word, so go ahead. I'm not responding any further, so you automatically win that one. :) Your e-mail address says it all. -----Original Message----- From: vaculpep-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:vaculpep-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Craig Kilby Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:45 PM To: mdillow31@verizon.net; vaculpep@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [VACULPEP] It's all relative I am by no means am trying to "intinimidate" you. All I ask from anyone is to provide evidence of what they assert. You are either a descendant of William the Conquorer, or you aren't. If you say are, then PROVE IT I cannot comprehend how people take this so personally. You either have credible evidence, or you don't. If you do, then present it. If you do not have evidence, don't present it. Seems pretty simple to me. I think even Judge Judy would concur on this simple basic point. On Jan 6, 2009, at 1:55 PM, marianne dillow wrote: > I refuse to be intinimidated by you.   

I remember Craig saying he does genealogy for others and charges. Just a nice freeby for him if he recieves these records.? I hope if he charges for work done by others he shares -----Original Message----- From: marianne dillow <mdillow31@verizon.net> To: vaculpep@rootsweb.com Sent: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 3:55 pm Subject: Re: [VACULPEP] It's all relative Hi Pat, ? Craig wants? my report from Family Tree Maker?.. "off list"... so he can use it for others. Craig knows very well I can't send attachments to this list. I have eleven? pages of records on just one grandfather let alone the rest of them.?Craig can do his own work. ? Thanks for your comments. :) ? Marianne Dillow --- On Tue, 1/6/09, Haynes, Patricia A. <phaynes@fulbright.com> wrote: From: Haynes, Patricia A. <phaynes@fulbright.com> Subject: Re: [VACULPEP] It's all relative To: vaculpep@rootsweb.com, "Craig Kilby" <persisto@earthlink.net> Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 1:51 PM Maybe I missed something in this discussion, but I don't recall anyone actually saying they descend from William the Conqueror, so I don't know why you keep bringing it up. Sure it's probably hypothetical, but what's the point of referring to it over and over? I agree that evidence is credible or it isn't, but perhaps it's not what you are saying, but HOW you are saying it. You can be rather dismissive in your tone when replying. Nothing personal, just an observation. I also observe that you like to have the last word, so go ahead. I'm not responding any further, so you automatically win that one. :) Your e-mail address says it all. -----Original Message----- From: vaculpep-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:vaculpep-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Craig Kilby Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:45 PM To: mdillow31@verizon.net; vaculpep@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [VACULPEP] It's all relative I am by no means am trying to "intinimidate" you. All I ask from anyone is to provide evidence of what they assert. You are either a descendant of William the Conquorer, or you aren't. If you say are, then PROVE IT I cannot comprehend how people take this so personally. You either have credible evidence, or you don't. If you do, then present it. If you do not have evidence, don't present it. Seems pretty simple to me. I think even Judge Judy would concur on this simple basic point. On Jan 6, 2009, at 1:55 PM, mari anne dillow wrote: > I refuse to be intinimidated by you. ?? ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to VACULPEP-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message