Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [VAAUGUST] Conflict between Patton & Craig
    2. Sue/Alex
    3. I have (admittedly from internet sources so would like your input) Col. James Patton as son of Henry & Sarah Lynn Patton. Sarah was the sister of Wm Lynn (married Margaret Patton either 1st or 2cd cousin to Henry Patton) whose daughter Margaret m John Lewis. Other children of Henry & Sarah Patton: Robert b 1685 Donegal, Ireland d 1755 Sudsbury, Chester Co. PA wife: Margaret Woods b. 1710 daughter of Adam & Sarah Woods. Adam was the brother of Michael Woods. Thomas b 1686 d 1774 Montgomery Co, VA, John b 1689 d 1757 Pendleton Co. m 1.Sarah Rogers 2.Agness Snodgrass and Elizabeth b 1700 m John Preston 1724. I'm interested in the Osborne connection. There are Osbornes in Greenbrier Co. who intermarry with Kincaids around 1800. Do you know if they are related? Sue in Newport > > As you know and mentioned the Lewis family was kin to Patton. > > Pattons wife Mary was a Osborne and she had sister Margaret who married the > Rev. John Thompson who wanted to pastor the Tinkling Springs Meeting House. > > Rev. John Thompson was turned down from Donegal, Ireland and had to go > elsewhere. > > William Thompson Sr, who I believe is brother to Rev. John Thompson gave the > land for the Tinkling Springs Church to be built. > > This William Thompson had a son William Thompson Jr, who married Mary Patton > the daughter of Col. James Patton and Mary Osborne. Wm and Mary Thompson is > my line. > > So we have the Pattons, Prestons, Buchanans, Lewises and Breckenridges > attending and worshiping there at Tinkling Springs Presbyterian Church. > William Preston was Patton's nephew. > Also I have not found any documentation that Benjamin Borden or Michael > Woods were related to Patton, do you know where that information came from. > I know there were some researchers who had thought that Mary Osborne was > Mary Borden, but more evidence and good sources suggest otherwise. > > I will be looking forward to your reply and giving me the direction where to > go for the Borden and Woods data. >

    10/20/2004 07:57:56