Roger, if there are no copyright problems (and it's a million to one there aren't in this case) it strikes me that you have an "all or none" proposition. I'm thinking the "key" for almost every reader will be the individual's name. If he or she is in my line or I'm interested in the individual I definitely will want every last whit and dot available. If I have no interest (either historical or genealogical) in "that name" I'm likely to see the name and move quickly on, no harm, no foul. Looks to me that the percentages say provide it ALL unless you have some kind of space constraint. John M. Poythress