This should have read: "There were two more _CHILDREN_ to dispose of as children of David-2 Fox [not David-1 Fox] and Hannah Ball" instead of "David-1 and Hannah Ball" as I wrote. I apologize (again.) Craig On Sep 14, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Craig Kilby wrote: >> There were two more [children] to dispose of as children of David-1 Fox and Hannah >> Ball: Mary (explained above) and a questionable son Henry Fox. The source >> for Henry Fox being included as a child in this family SEEMS to go back to a >> footnote in Hayden's *Virginia Genealogies* when he says there was a Henry >> Fox in King William County who "MAY" be a son of David-1 Fox, father of >> David-2. Regardless, he is NOT a son in this family