I too got a raw deal from Shelby Co GenWeb page. I guess you noticed. I am sorry about your bad experience. May I link your work to In the Past Lane? -----Original Message----- From: Jim Barrett <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Friday, November 19, 1999 3:46 PM Subject: Re: Dixon and Weaver Cemeteries of Shelby Co. >I just wanted to let the list know that my links to Dixion and Weaver >Cemeteries will not be added to the Shelby Co. GenWeb page. The reply I >received follows. They wanted to copy my list, alphabetize it, and put it >on their pages. I refused. They refused to even give temporary links to >my pages. > >It is my opinion that a list by rows, which helps to show a possible >relationship is better than an alphabetical list. Those who control the >page don't agree with me. That is their right, just as it is my right to >tell them not to copy and alphabetize my list. > >All of you are welcome to visit my pages anytime you wish. > >http://www.flash.net/~parino/cem_dixon.htm >http://www.flash.net/~parino/cem_weaver.htm > >Sorry it didn't work out. I hope those of you who do visit my lists find >them helpful. > >Jim Barrett >Bedford, TX > >----- Original Message ----- >From: rayjac <[email protected]> >To: Jim Barrett <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, November 19, 1999 7:51 AM >Subject: Re: Dixon and Weaver Cemeteries of Shelby Co. > > >> At this time we will not link to your sites. We will go to the cemetery >and >> transcribe for rootsweb. Alpha is best for genealogy and that is what >> roosweb is about, not who is buried next each other. Thanks or your >offer.\ > > > >