RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. RE: Great New Fayette County Map Online
    2. H Williams
    3. That's nifty, Rox Ann. Thanks for telling us about it. And I'd think with so many "cemetery hunters" now being equipped with inexpensive GPS locators, that they should be able to provide a good, constant source of physical inventories, as it were. Speaking of which, I wonder if address (if applicable), latitude and longitude are things that might be included in the pop-up identification bubble. Thanks again, --Hughes Williams http://www.relatedlines.com/ ----Original Message Follows---- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 18:48:02 -0600 From: Rox Ann Johnson <roxannjohnson@sbcglobal.net> To: TXFAYETT-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Great New Fayette County Map Online Hi, everyone. There's an interesting new feature at the Fayette County TXGenWeb site at http://www.rootsweb.com/~txfayett/countymap.html

    11/04/2005 01:11:02
    1. Re: [TXFAY] RE: Great New Fayette County Map Online
    2. Rox Ann Johnson
    3. I'll keep the latitude and longitude idea in mind for the bubbles as the maps are developed. Meanwhile, anyone interested can take a look at the cemeteries listed at the Fayette TXGenWeb site to see which ones are missing the GPS information, starting at http:// www.rootsweb.com/~txfayett/cemeteries_a-b.html If you can supply the coordinates for any of the cemeteries missing them, I'll update the site. I don't have a GPS locater yet. Even when that feature becomes available, I will not be able to add more cemeteries to the map until I have their coordinates. Rox Ann Johnson On Nov 4, 2005, at 8:11 AM, H Williams wrote: > That's nifty, Rox Ann. Thanks for telling us about it. > > And I'd think with so many "cemetery hunters" now being equipped > with inexpensive GPS locators, that they should be able to provide > a good, constant source of physical inventories, as it were. > Speaking of which, I wonder if address (if applicable), latitude > and longitude are things that might be included in the pop-up > identification bubble. > > Thanks again, > > --Hughes Williams > http://www.relatedlines.com/

    11/04/2005 04:52:17