I am all in favor of one list, but do think location and DATES are important to include. They sure narrow it down a lot. Thanks Robbie -----Original Message----- From: jerryt <jerryt@classicfm.net> To: TURNER-L@rootsweb.com <TURNER-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Saturday, January 15, 2000 9:14 AM Subject: Re: [TURNER] Two Lists >Hi All, > >I would like to add my agreement to this. I am not aware of any of my TURNER >family going to the States, so 99% of the postings are of no value to me, >not can I offer any assistance on them. > >Jerry TURNER >Thanet, Kent. U.K. >Researching TURNER Ripon, Leyton and Middlesex in the U.K. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: michael.a.lonsdale <michael.a.lonsdale@classicfm.net> >To: <TURNER-L@rootsweb.com> >Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2000 4:45 PM >Subject: [TURNER] Two Lists > > >> Hi everybody >> I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons here. >> >> I feel that this and some other lists should now be split into 2. >> One for America and one for the rest of the world. And then maybe split >> further >> >> Specialised surname lists like this one seem to be all state side >orientated >> which I'm personaly not interested in, 99percent of the mail received is >> about BDM's in America. >> >> Don't know what others think, but if the lists where into States it would >> help in the narrow down the search, same goes for the UK. >> >> Very Popular names are far flung, when you are trying to research one area >> it surely would be easier. >> >> Michael >> >> >> ==== TURNER Mailing List ==== >> List problems? Contact the TURNER listowner <cch@netdoor.com> >> >> > > >==== TURNER Mailing List ==== >CYNDI's - http://www.CyndisList.com >