Sorry, I meant to send this to the list and not to Karen only. Debbie ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Debbie Parker Wayne <debbie@debbiewayne.com> Date: Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [TGF] Terminology To: "Karen J. Matheson" <mathesonkarenj@gmail.com> Karen, Are you thinking of the discussion on one side of Elizabeth Shown Mills' "Evidence Analysis: A Research Process Map" Quicksheet? There is a discussion of original and derivative sources followed by a discussion of derivatives "that might be considered equivalent to originals," namely, duplicate original, image copy, and official record copy. There may have been some other terminology used while the evidence analysis map was being enhanced, but this was the main published source I could find with these distinctions. Regards, Debbie Debbie Parker Wayne, Certified Genealogist® -- http://debbiewayne.com/ DNA Project Chair, Texas State Genealogical Society -- http://txsgs.org/ ​Co-author of *Genetic Genealogy in Practice* with Blaine T. Bettinger​ On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Karen J. Matheson <mathesonkarenj@gmail.com > wrote: > Yes, in citations I would label it "digital image." > Preservation copy is not what I was thinking of. > It's a label I've heard in the past when discussing original and derivative > records. > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Dee Dee King < > king@forensicgenealogyservices.com> wrote: > > > Are you asking about preservation copy? > > > > > On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:55 PM, Jill Morelli <jkmorelli@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In my citations, I call it "digital image". > > > > > > Jill > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Karen J. Matheson < > > mathesonkarenj@gmail.com > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> What do you call a microfilmed or digital image of an original record > > that > > >> has not been altered? It's a term that reflects the "original" status > of > > >> the document + the duplicated image. I just can't recall it. Help! > > >> > ​... > >