RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 6560/7661
    1. New Union Query (Cook)
    2. This person is not a member of our list. If you can help him please respond to his e-mail address or he will not see it. This query will not be posted on the query page due to the fact it does not mention Union County. But if the names are familiar to you help him out. -Chip jeffacook@juno.com (Jeff Cook) I am inquiring on how I start the process of tracing my family bloodlines in the Tennessee valley area. My clues are very limited and my memory is even worse. Most of my relatives are either dead or unknown to me. My fathers name was William Wiener Cook. Born 12-8- 1908? He had many sibilings One by the name of Russell Cook . His wife's name was Roni. Who wereboth buried there. Any help on this matter would be very welcomed. Thank you for your time Jeffacook@juno.com

    02/09/1999 07:59:55
    1. New Union Query
    2. A new message, "Brasier Family," was posted by Carrie Richardson-Ozment on Mon, 08 Feb 1999 --- NAME: Carrie Richardson-Ozment EMAIL: bellagrg@swbell.net SURNAMES: Brasier DATE: Feb 08 1999 QRYTEXT: I am searching for information on the family of my grandmother, Cynthia Ann 'Daisy' Brasier. She was born August 26,1889 in either Maynardville,Union Co., or Maryville,Blount Co. She married James Asbury Richardson(born 2-15-1880,Tullahoma,Coffee Co,TN.) She had three children in TN before moving to LA and then on to TX..

    02/09/1999 02:41:31
    1. hi
    2. h
    3. To all fellow researchers, I'am looking for a marriage certificate going back to 11-23-1879 of my ggg grandparents William N. Cook and Melvina E. Monday Cook. Can someone help me? Thanks, Al

    02/08/1999 08:37:49
    1. New Union Query (Hammock)
    2. A new message, "William S. Hammock," was posted by Carl T. Booker on Mon, 08 Feb 1999 --- NAME: Carl T. Booker EMAIL: bookercgbr@aol.com SURNAMES: DATE: Feb 08 1999 QRYTEXT: I would like to know to birthdate, date of death (near 1907) and cause of dealth of William S. Hammock, former postmaster of Luttrell/Maynardville, TN. I thought this was in Union County, but that County isn't listed. Booker,Carl T.

    02/08/1999 02:06:02
    1. Re: Union Co Marriages
    2. There are a lot of Union county records available on microfilm through the LDS Church. That's where I read the marriages starting in 1864. Karen

    02/07/1999 11:57:01
    1. Re: Union Co Marriages
    2. joe wendelken
    3. At 01:29 PM 2/7/99 EST, you wrote: >Unfortunately although supposedly the county was started up in 1850 on paper, >it didn't get going quite that early in reality, and then marriage records >apparently don't start until 1864...perhaps because of the war. I suppose a >lot of others on this list have a lot of "black hole" marriages they can't >find dates for that would have occurred during that time period. > The above is not exactly true. The county was organized in 1849 and became a reality in 1850; however, the marriage records that one may be looking for were all destroyed when the court house burned in 1969. And, not only marriage records were destroyed but deeds and many other documents that would enable one to do genealogical research........liz

    02/07/1999 06:39:06
    1. Re: Union Co Marriages
    2. If the courthouse didn't burn until 1969 the records would be in Nashville. Betty Webb

    02/07/1999 05:00:01
    1. New Union Query
    2. A new message, "Cook and Robertson," was posted by Dixie Smith on Sat, 06 Feb 1999 --- NAME: Dixie Smith EMAIL: dixean@ipa.net SURNAMES: Cook, Robertson, Cyrus, Rogers DATE: Feb 06 1999 QRYTEXT: Looking for information on John Cook born 1846 married Emily Robertson in Union County 17 Nov, 1867. John is son of Martin Cook and Elizabeth Cyrus. Emily is daughter of William Robertson and Rebecca Rogers. would like to find a decendent of John and Emily. Their children are, Luna, William,Sarah,Viola and Maggie cook..

    02/07/1999 12:07:18
    1. hi
    2. h
    3. To all fellow researchers, I am looking if anyone can help me find a marriage certificate that goes back to 1879 in Union Co.Tn. I was told that it was in a book. Please help. Al

    02/07/1999 09:46:09
    1. Union Co Marriages
    2. You can get Union county marriages on microfilm from the LDS family history center. (Early ones tell how many years it was since the American Revolution.) Next best thing to being there & getting a real one, because you can have them make a copy of the ones you want. Unfortunately although supposedly the county was started up in 1850 on paper, it didn't get going quite that early in reality, and then marriage records apparently don't start until 1864...perhaps because of the war. I suppose a lot of others on this list have a lot of "black hole" marriages they can't find dates for that would have occurred during that time period. Karen BOOKER, ATKINS/ADKINS, MONROE & allied lines

    02/07/1999 06:29:46
    1. Wright/Loy Family
    2. Bill Hunter
    3. Hi List, Can anyone tell me the parents of Nancy Loy who married William M. Wright in Union county January 27, 1887? Were there any children of this marriage? Thanks, Bill Hunter

    02/05/1999 09:43:22
    1. Re Hamilton Site Plus More
    2. Cousins, I will share my cousin Bill's hompage with all. I thought I had Margy. You know how sometime you don't see who it is returning to...... The list or or a person. Sorry bout that. Florence <A HREF="http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/j/e/n/Bill--Jennings/index.html" >Family Tree Maker's Genealogy Site: User Home Pages: Jennings Clan, NoInc. Home Page</A> You can also get there thru my homepage. It is the first link... It hasn't changed much, but is in the process. Soon there will be Williams info there,,,,, Plus+ <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/flocorn/index.html">Welcome to Florence's Family</A> << Just go into the Hamilton Site,,,,,,,, then the rest..... Florence > Bill has done a wonderful job of recording the William Hamilton line - however, several children need updating. PLEASE share additional info with ALL the Hamilton researchers -- not just one individual -- we are all looking for the same wonderful ancestors..... THANKS BIll for your homepage Margie in FL

    02/05/1999 01:22:26
    1. Re: DAR and LDS Online
    2. elderbrooks
    3. Thank you, very, very good. Ann P. -----Original Message----- From: OmahaMom@aol.com <OmahaMom@aol.com> To: TNUNION-L@rootsweb.com <TNUNION-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Thursday, February 04, 1999 1:28 PM Subject: Re: DAR and LDS Online >With LDS Ancestral File, IGI, etc. as with FTM and other databases that are >submitted by human beings, there's always a chance of error. This is >particularly true of family pedigrees contributed by individuals who are less >meticulous in their search for accuracy. Things of this nature should be >regarded as clues, however, until the sources are checked personally, and >documented. > >Even those who are meticulous in their research, it isn't unheard of to >occasionally make a mistake (human nature being what it is.) The thing then >is to fix it and move on. > >Apparently LDS is getting ready to put Ancestral File on-line for everyone to >use from home, possibly as early as May, if all goes without hitch [does it >ever?]. (This is a very different thing from some of the other rumors of >digitizing ALL the microfilms that they have available and putting them on- >line. The likelihood of that happening is probably much less, particularly >since there are a great many microfilms that are restricted in nature as to >what circulation they can make available to potential patrons.) And while a >great many of us can't afford regular pilgrimages to either the ancestral home >to search for records, or to Salt Lake where microfilm copies of many of those >same records are kept available for use, using the facilities of the LDS FHC >for access to copies of the original records can't be encouraged enough. It's >the next best thing to being there. Certainly looking at a microfilm of the >original is better than trusting a transcriber of a book to be 100% accurate >(always subject to human accuracy, interpretation of handwriting, familiarity >with names, etc.) > >Bottom line simply has to be, if it isn't the original source, or >microfilm/xerox copy of same, use it as a clue, and verify, verify, verify. >Anything less and we risk repeating someone else's mistakes. > >Karen > > >==== TNUNION Mailing List ==== >If you live in Union County why not pitch in. Take a day and write down the tombstones in the nearest cemetery. Send it to us for others to use. You could be helping a cousin. Go to the courthouse and copy some early marriage records. Anything helps. > >

    02/04/1999 06:26:33
    1. Re: TNUNION-D Digest V99 #34
    2. In a message dated 2/4/99 12:08:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, TNUNION-D- request@rootsweb.com writes: << Just go into the Hamilton Site,,,,,,,, then the rest..... Florence >> Bill has done a wonderful job of recording the William Hamilton line - however, several children need updating. PLEASE share additional info with ALL the Hamilton researchers -- not just one individual -- we are all looking for the same wonderful ancestors..... THANKS BIll for your homepage Margie in FL

    02/04/1999 03:52:39
    1. Re: DAR and LDS Online
    2. With LDS Ancestral File, IGI, etc. as with FTM and other databases that are submitted by human beings, there's always a chance of error. This is particularly true of family pedigrees contributed by individuals who are less meticulous in their search for accuracy. Things of this nature should be regarded as clues, however, until the sources are checked personally, and documented. Even those who are meticulous in their research, it isn't unheard of to occasionally make a mistake (human nature being what it is.) The thing then is to fix it and move on. Apparently LDS is getting ready to put Ancestral File on-line for everyone to use from home, possibly as early as May, if all goes without hitch [does it ever?]. (This is a very different thing from some of the other rumors of digitizing ALL the microfilms that they have available and putting them on- line. The likelihood of that happening is probably much less, particularly since there are a great many microfilms that are restricted in nature as to what circulation they can make available to potential patrons.) And while a great many of us can't afford regular pilgrimages to either the ancestral home to search for records, or to Salt Lake where microfilm copies of many of those same records are kept available for use, using the facilities of the LDS FHC for access to copies of the original records can't be encouraged enough. It's the next best thing to being there. Certainly looking at a microfilm of the original is better than trusting a transcriber of a book to be 100% accurate (always subject to human accuracy, interpretation of handwriting, familiarity with names, etc.) Bottom line simply has to be, if it isn't the original source, or microfilm/xerox copy of same, use it as a clue, and verify, verify, verify. Anything less and we risk repeating someone else's mistakes. Karen

    02/04/1999 06:22:16
    1. Re: TNUNION-D Digest V99 #32
    2. In a message dated 2/2/99 1:10:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, Mwhit2632@aol.com writes: << Please give us a little more info on her lineage -- have over 2200 names in my HAMILTON-LAY database, which includes several related families... Will be glad to work with any HAMILTON - LAY researchers! We have just recently found several new links with brothers and sisters of my ancestors! The more the merrier... >> <A HREF="http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/j/e/n/Bill--Jennings/index.html" >Family Tree Maker's Genealogy Site: User Home Pages: Jennings Clan, NoInc. Home Page</A> Just go into the Hamilton Site,,,,,,,, then the rest..... Florence

    02/04/1999 05:01:57
    1. DAR and LDS Online
    2. The DAR has completed their searchable records database. As they won't loan their books it may not help most of us. However if you live close enough to a Dar Chapter it may give you an idea of which books to check. Also most of the books listed are available through other sources, maybe even your library. Check out their website at: http://dar.library.net The LDS is in the process of placing their records online. We have heard rumors for some time of their plans to do that. Here is the URL of a news article from BYU outlining their plans. http://newsnet.byu.edu/noframes/show_story.cfm?number=8836 While the LDS may well hold the largest collection of genealogical records, I as well as many others feel that their accuracy may sometimes be in question. But in the larger scheme of things any information is a step in the right direction. Chip Union County TnGenWeb

    02/04/1999 01:37:30
  1. 02/03/1999 07:59:39
    1. Re: New Union Query
    2. James Ferguson
    3. Morom01@aol.com wrote: > > A new message, "HUNDLEY," was posted by Rebecca True on Tue, 02 Feb 1999 > It is a response to "Union County Cemetery," posted by Peggy Ferguson > on Tue, 29 Sep 1998 > > --- > NAME: Rebecca True > EMAIL: sramc@webtv.net > SURNAMES: HUNDLEY > DATE: Feb 02 1999 > QRYTEXT: > Looking for a Frank Hundley He is My great Grandfather I belive He was from > Maynardsvile TN. > His childerns Names were Amos,Sara,Easter. If you have any information on any > of these pepole please > contact Me. > Rebecca (Hundley) True. > > ==== TNUNION Mailing List ==== > Volunteers are always welcome at the Union County TnGenWeb Site. Also check at the TnGenWeb main site. Lots of resources there. Maybe you can help out by transcribing some records. Someone please refresh my memory on my message. Peggy Ferguson

    02/03/1999 05:43:13
    1. New Union Response (Peter Loy)
    2. You'll notice here that I have started putting the name in the message line. Hope this helps. A new message, "PETER LOY," was posted by Patricia Purvis on Wed, 03 Feb 1999 It is a response to "Peter Loy's father John Loy, Jr.," posted by Delores Rochelle Walls on Mon, 25 Jan 1999 --- NAME: Patricia Purvis EMAIL: Ladijay1@aol.COM SURNAMES: Loy, Brantley, Weaver, Daniels, Boruff DATE: Feb 03 1999 QRYTEXT: I am trying to find Nettie Loy who married Benjamin Brantley. I have Peter Loy and Philopena Sharp as her parents. That would make her my ggreatgrandmother. The date I have for her marriage is Feb 4,1855. in Union county. If this is the same family I would apperciate any info on the other siblings. Thanks so much, Patricia.

    02/03/1999 03:54:31