Since we are on the subject of Glovers of Sullivan Co., I thought I would bring this up. I had been told that all the Glovers of Sullivan Co. were descended from Richard Glover, Rev. War veteran and one of the Glover brothers who were born in Maryland, lived in Virginia, then spread out over the Southeast (Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee-Richard). My husband is descended from 2 different Sullivan Co. Glovers. His paternal line is John R. Glover, b. abt 1790 and his grandmother's line is Alfred Glover, b. 1804. Given that these two Glovers lived in the same area (in one census 2 households away) I had assumed that they did indeed come from the same family and were both probably sons of Richard Glover, even though my husband's aunt kept saying that there were 2 bunches of Glovers there and that her mother and father were NOT related before they married. Anyway, my husband recently participated in the Glover DNA test and it turns out that he, as a descendant of John R. Glover, is NOT genetically related to descendants of the other Maryland Glover brothers. So that presents some questions...is Richard Glover of Sullivan Co. NOT a brother to the other Maryland born brothers as previously assumed? Were there really 2 early Glover families in the same area of Sullivan Co. as my husband's aunt claims who were not related and Alfred is descended from Richard, but John R. is not? OR was there a frisky milkman somewhere in my husband's ancestry who wasn't a Glover at all?? What would help to solve this would be other Sullivan Co. Glovers who are willing to do DNA testing. If anyone out is male and still has the Glover surname who is descended from a Sullivan Co. Glover, please contact me for information on doing the DNA test. The more we get will help to shine more light on this increasingly confusing problem.