No problem with it being put on the internet at all. That is where it belongs. Just doesn't have to go to EVERYBODY ON THE INTERNET is all I am saying. It should be "scoped" to those that might be concerned ... just a bit more. Does EVERY QUERY HAVE TO BE DUMPED ON EVERYONE is what I am saying. Shouldn't there be a "bulletin board" or something of that nature??? -----Original Message----- From: Ken Parks <kenparks@earthlink.net> To: TNRHEA-L@rootsweb.com <TNRHEA-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Sunday, January 16, 2000 4:56 AM Subject: Re: Grandview, TN >Am I missing something here? The information below seems pretty typical of the >type of information you find everyday in a multitude of genealogical sites. >What, specifically, is the problem with the information below being put on the >internet? If my ignorance is not allowing me to grasp the problem, please >educate me so I don't make the same type of mistake.--Ken Parks > >Chuck Lowry wrote: > >> I think it's nice to have the ability to search for information on the >> net, but does it have to go to EVERYONE EVERYWHERE AND BECOME A PIECE OF >> .... WHATEVER? >> And this is NOT aimed at the lady that wrote this, but at TNRHEA for >> allowing it to happen. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: TERINITA@aol.com <TERINITA@aol.com> >> To: TNRHEA-L@rootsweb.com <TNRHEA-L@rootsweb.com> >> Date: Saturday, January 15, 2000 10:45 AM >> Subject: Grandview, TN >> >> >My name is Terri and I'm new to the list. Thank you for having me. >> >I am searching for information on cemeteries in Grandview. My gg >> grandparents >> >William and Jane Cox are buried in Grandview. >> >My line is: >> >Descendants of William Cox >> > >> > 1 William Cox 1844 - >> >.. +Jane 1846 - >> > 2 Florence Cox >> >.. +-------West >> > 2 John Cox 1858 - >> > 2 Mary Cox 1864 - >> >.. +---------Carter >> > 2 Sally Jane 1868 - >> >.. +--------Thompson >> > 2 William D Cox 1870 - >> > 2 Hattie Carrie Cox 1887 - 1932 >> >.. +Samuel Rufus Parker 1865 - 1926 >> >Does anyone connect with this line? >> >I'd appreciate any and all info. >> >Thanks, >> >Teri Pendergrass >> > >