Check the Overton County 1850 Cences, I know that I saw some Gunter on those Cences when I was looking for some other families. Gunter is not part of my family but I was raised near a Gunter family. Betty Neely ----- Original Message ----- From: "james garrett" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:34 PM Subject: [TNOVERTO] Fwd: Martha Jane Smith > > --WebTV-Mail-12079-1859 > Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit > > JW Garrett > > > --WebTV-Mail-12079-1859 > Content-Disposition: Inline > Content-Type: Message/RFC822 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit > > X-WebTV-Signature: 1 > ETAsAhRTwMkZZH+WLSqcpdbAUqrbywjHUQIUR3GW9ohQWTZXtsij5GjoFRKXdxg= > From: [email protected] (james garrett) > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:32:55 -0400 (EDT) > To: [email protected] > Subject: Martha Jane Smith > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Disposition: Inline > Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit > MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV) > > Looking over my notes, I realized that William M. Gunter would have only > been 14 if he had a son John who is 10 in 1870. William is 24. John wold > be b. 1860, but William is listd in his fathers, William W. Gunter, > household @ age 14. So who is this John? > If john was not William and Martha Janes son, then did they marry ~ > 1864 as son James being b. 1865? > If this be the case, could this Martha Jane be the daughter of Daniel > and Sarah Smith of 1850 Overton Co.? Problem is that she was with them > in White Co.,in 1860. Did she return to Fentress Co. before 1864? > Thanks for any help. > > JW Garrett > > > --WebTV-Mail-12079-1859-- > > > ==== TNOVERTO Mailing List ==== > ADDRESS OVERTON LIST MESSAGES > TOT: [email protected] > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 >