Thanks. I didn't think so but had to ask as Smith Co. Census was posted. I didn't know if I needed to spend time to read it all. Thank you and thanks to those who generously share with us. Now, for Bradley help! ~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~* Visit my genealogy homepage: http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/l/e/w/Nancy-W-Lewis/index.html Also visit my little 3 year old friend, Michael Woodroffe's page. Michael is a cancer kid. http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2587/michael/michael1.htm His Grandpa has put Miss Nancy's Class on his page. Please visit it and send Michael an email. http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2587/michael/missnancy1.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: <allenjm@bellsouth.net> To: <TNCHEATH-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 2:58 PM Subject: Re: [TNCHEATH-L] New website!!! > Cheatham was never part of Smith County - not even close. It was > part of Davidson, Montgomery, Robertson and Dickson. > Rsp Jim Allen > > Family Historian wrote: > > > Was Cheatham County at one time part of Smith > > County?~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~* > > Visit my genealogy homepage: > > http://www.familytreemaker.com/users/l/e/w/Nancy-W-Lewis/index.html > > Also visit my little 3 year old friend, Michael Woodroffe's page. Michael > > is a cancer kid. > > http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2587/michael/michael1.htm > > His Grandpa has put Miss Nancy's Class on his page. Please visit it and > > send Michael an email. > > http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/2587/michael/missnancy1.htm > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <tomsgirl@bellsouth.net> > > To: <TNCHEATH-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 1:25 PM > > Subject: [TNCHEATH-L] New website!!! > > > > > Hello Everyone! > > > > > > I received the following message from another mailing list and thought > > someone may be able to find some info - > > > Today the 1850 Census has been updated all proofed and all online! > > > Thanks to all the volunteers both financial and transcribers. > > > A special thanks to Anne Pyle for the tough job of proofing the entire > > > census. There are 13,897 names in the 1850 census. > > > > > > Needless to say both editor and proofer had to make a few calls > > > on interpretaion of some names. If you feel there are any errors > > > I welcome the challenge to update those. > > > > > > So Update all bookmarks .... > > > > > > http://members.home.net/gregorycj/1850/CENSINDX.HTM > > > > > > > > > Robbie > > > > > > > > > > >