Bridgett, Sorry, I misunderstood what the vote was about. Since the vote is only to determine whether there is enough interest to discuss incorporation, I am not disappointed. My apologies for not asking before shooting my mouth off. You'd think I'd know better after -ALL :-) George of Lincoln On 16 Jul 98 at 12:29, Bridgett: > George: > > I can understand your disappointment. And although it is an > off-handed compliment that most cc's will respond to any suggestion > put out by the SC or ASC -- I sincerely hope that folks will *really* > vote their conscience on this matter. > > It doesn't matter to me whether to incorporate gets voted in or not. > Either way will not change the project any at all, at least that's my > take on it. However, since this has been an ongoing discussion with > the RC's (some discussion -- I send out by-laws, some send back > answers), Fred and a few others, and mentioned on the TNGen list, I > think we need to make a decision pro/con and move on. > > I also feel that I don't want to take the heat that the KSGenWeb is > taking about incorporating -- conflicting stories are that the cc's > got to vote whether they wanted to incorp. to just seeing a msg about > incorporating, no vote. I want this done so everyone has an input in > the matter, which this list is for -- or to register their vote on > the other list. > > I am just hoping that the folks that normally don't partake in > posting to the list will at least vote on this issue. > > Bridgett > > > > > On 16 Jul 98 at 14:43, TNCHAT-L@rootsweb.com wrote: > > > Neighbor Su, > > > > None of this has been discussed. And IMHO it is too late to do so. Most > > cc's will respond to any suggestion from the SC and the ASC with a YES > > vote. Done deal. > > > > I'm disappointed that it happened this way. > > > > George of Lincoln > > > ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ > > Bridgett Smith > TNGenWeb State Coordinator > http://www.tngenweb.org/ >