George etal, The question in the origial mailing is "Reply - All to this list simply with yes or no if you would like to pursue non-profit incorporation. The voting period will be one week only." There are a few items that need to be addressed prior to filing. Like the name issue. So if the CCs want us to pursue incoropration, then we ALL need to settle the questions first. Fred Smoot >>> George Waller wrote: > > Bridgett, > Sorry, I misunderstood what the vote was about. > Since the vote is only to determine whether there > is enough interest to discuss incorporation, I > am not disappointed. > > My apologies for not asking before shooting my mouth off. > You'd think I'd know better after -ALL :-) > > George of Lincoln > > On 16 Jul 98 at 12:29, Bridgett: > > > George: > > > > I can understand your disappointment. And although it is an > > off-handed compliment that most cc's will respond to any suggestion > > put out by the SC or ASC -- I sincerely hope that folks will *really* > > vote their conscience on this matter. > > > > It doesn't matter to me whether to incorporate gets voted in or not. > > Either way will not change the project any at all, at least that's my > > take on it. However, since this has been an ongoing discussion with > > the RC's (some discussion -- I send out by-laws, some send back > > answers), Fred and a few others, and mentioned on the TNGen list, I > > think we need to make a decision pro/con and move on. > > > > I also feel that I don't want to take the heat that the KSGenWeb is > > taking about incorporating -- conflicting stories are that the cc's > > got to vote whether they wanted to incorp. to just seeing a msg about > > incorporating, no vote. I want this done so everyone has an input in > > the matter, which this list is for -- or to register their vote on > > the other list. > > > > I am just hoping that the folks that normally don't partake in > > posting to the list will at least vote on this issue. > > > > Bridgett > > > > > > > > > > On 16 Jul 98 at 14:43, TNCHAT-L@rootsweb.com wrote: > > > > > Neighbor Su, > > > > > > None of this has been discussed. And IMHO it is too late to do so. Most > > > cc's will respond to any suggestion from the SC and the ASC with a YES > > > vote. Done deal. > > > > > > I'm disappointed that it happened this way. > > > > > > George of Lincoln > > > > > ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ * ~ > > > > Bridgett Smith > > TNGenWeb State Coordinator > > http://www.tngenweb.org/ > >