the exhibits are in TMG's exhibit file Phyllis On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:11 PM Dennis Lee Bieber < bieber.genealogy@earthlink.net> wrote: > No actual experience with this feature but... > > At 1/22/2019 5:46 PM, Phyllis Kramer wrote: > >In release 9 (upgraded from release 8) on Windows 10. > > > >Two problems with chart making...i really hope you can advise... > >Very strange...when i click in the exhibit log, the photograph > >appears...with the * for primary photograph. > >but it doesnt print in the box tree chart. > > ... are these internal or external exhibits? > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

No actual experience with this feature but... At 1/22/2019 5:46 PM, Phyllis Kramer wrote: >In release 9 (upgraded from release 8) on Windows 10. > >Two problems with chart making...i really hope you can advise... >Very strange...when i click in the exhibit log, the photograph >appears...with the * for primary photograph. >but it doesnt print in the box tree chart. ... are these internal or external exhibits?

In release 9 (upgraded from release 8) on Windows 10. Two problems with chart making...i really hope you can advise... Very strange...when i click in the exhibit log, the photograph appears...with the * for primary photograph. but it doesnt print in the box tree chart. if i "insert new image" and "select existing file, the same photograph will move into the exhibit log i then make the photograph primary and it prints in the box tree chart. why doesnt it print the photos in the exhibit log? problem 2- photographs in the box tree chart...are defined as 60x60 pixels. the boxes have a width of 166 pixels. Yet the photographs often cause the first letter or two of the surname to not print. thanks for any thoughts on these Phyllis

Hi, Ken! Yes, the RUG still meets in person in McLean but onsite attendance varies, especially when the speaker is presenting from afar. In that respect, making the meetings available via join.me <http://join.me/> has been a two-edged sword when it comes to local participation ... Re sound issues, we do occasionally have feedback when the meeting is being set up at the beginning but they are usually worked out by the time the meeting gets going at 9 am when we can mute everyone but the presenter. However, we are trying for a more interactive experience by NOT muting ALL. This allows one person _at_a_time to have exchanges with the online presenter. When in that mode, we have gotten feedback from folks who join the meeting late and don’t know to mute their microphones. Ken, please remember, if you miss a meeting, you can catch join.me <http://join.me/> recordings of most meetings on the RUG website, rootsusers.org <http://rootsusers.org/>, under Meeting Presentations. Also, one last thing… There will be a future notice posted about this but Ken, and everyone else, please “Save-The-Date” for the RUG’s 30th Anniversary celebration at our April 13th, 2019 meeting! Checkout the website for more details on the program from Terry Reigel! Hope you can join us in person in McLean! Regards, Janis Parkison Rodriguez VP Arlington RUG Southport, NC > On Jan 22, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Kenneth Wood <jkennethwood@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi David, > Thanks for the information. > I assumed that I would have to print it to a printing program such as Microsoft Print to PDF, and I did that. This allows me to print to a C or D sheet, depending on the size of the chart. Now I need to find someone who will print that size for me. > > I see the TMG User Group is still functioning. I tried to join using my computer, but the sound was so distorted that I gave up. I could attend the meetings, but that last time I went I was the only there beside you and Mike. I assumed that it had become strictly an online meeting. > > > Ken > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: David Walker > Sent: January 21, 2019 8:55 AM > To: The Master Genealogist Rootsweb Email List > Subject: [TMG] Re: printing charts > > Ken, printers can deal with PDF files. > > Regards….David > >> On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:50 PM, <jkennethwood@bell.net> <jkennethwood@bell.net> wrote: >> >> I have a chart 24 inches x 36 inches. I know that a local printer does that >> size. How do I prepare my file for that printer? >> >> >> >> Ken Wood >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref >> Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com >> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 >> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community > > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community > > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

On 1/22/2019 11:48 AM, Kenneth Wood wrote: > I see the TMG User Group is still functioning. I tried to join using my computer, but the sound was so distorted that I gave up. I could attend the meetings, but that last time I went I was the only there beside you and Mike. I assumed that it had become strictly an online meeting. Ken, I assume you are speaking of the Roots User Group in Arlington, Virginia. In fact the group continues to meet regularly, though less frequently than monthly. Roughly half the participants meet in the room and the rest online, though the ratio changes from meeting to meeting. There is currently a winter hiatus, so the next meeting in April 13, when I am scheduled to present from the room. There is more information on the RUG website, at http://www.rootsusers.org/ Terry Reigel

Kenneth. I save the charts first as .vc2 and then as .jpg files on a flash drive. I then take the jpg to any of the stores that have large format printers—Office Max, Staples, FedEx etc. The printers are usually limited to 24 inches in width but length is only restricted to amount of paper on the roll. I’ve had one printed as long as 60”. I usually do Ancestor Box Charts which I customize. Unless there are images on the chart I leave the resolution at around 100dpi. If there are images you’ll probably want a dpi of 200-300 to get a good printed image. Make sure the print page size is set for 24” on the short side (depending on capabilities of the printer). I use Photoshop or Lightroom to set everything up. And take the file in totally ready to print without the store clerk having to make any changes. I also send the jpgs to other family members who want the charts so they can take to be printed. Hope this helps. BTW: if I need to make changes to the chart, I open the .vc2 file, make the changes and save as jpg. Kaye Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 22, 2019, at 10:48 AM, Kenneth Wood <jkennethwood@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi David, > Thanks for the information. > I assumed that I would have to print it to a printing program such as Microsoft Print to PDF, and I did that. This allows me to print to a C or D sheet, depending on the size of the chart. Now I need to find someone who will print that size for me. > > I see the TMG User Group is still functioning. I tried to join using my computer, but the sound was so distorted that I gave up. I could attend the meetings, but that last time I went I was the only there beside you and Mike. I assumed that it had become strictly an online meeting. > > > Ken > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: David Walker > Sent: January 21, 2019 8:55 AM > To: The Master Genealogist Rootsweb Email List > Subject: [TMG] Re: printing charts > > Ken, printers can deal with PDF files. > > Regards….David > >> On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:50 PM, <jkennethwood@bell.net> <jkennethwood@bell.net> wrote: >> >> I have a chart 24 inches x 36 inches. I know that a local printer does that >> size. How do I prepare my file for that printer? >> >> >> >> Ken Wood >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref >> Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com >> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 >> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community > > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community > > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Hi David, Thanks for the information. I assumed that I would have to print it to a printing program such as Microsoft Print to PDF, and I did that. This allows me to print to a C or D sheet, depending on the size of the chart. Now I need to find someone who will print that size for me. I see the TMG User Group is still functioning. I tried to join using my computer, but the sound was so distorted that I gave up. I could attend the meetings, but that last time I went I was the only there beside you and Mike. I assumed that it had become strictly an online meeting. Ken Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: David Walker Sent: January 21, 2019 8:55 AM To: The Master Genealogist Rootsweb Email List Subject: [TMG] Re: printing charts Ken, printers can deal with PDF files. Regards….David > On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:50 PM, <jkennethwood@bell.net> <jkennethwood@bell.net> wrote: > > I have a chart 24 inches x 36 inches. I know that a local printer does that > size. How do I prepare my file for that printer? > > > > Ken Wood > > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Michael J. Hannah wrote: > I even looked at TMGU with its actions on Citations and > tried to set its filter to Source Number is less than > zero, but no matches so no help. Michael, In the TMG user interface, setting the source number to a negative value indicates the citation is excluded. In the database, however, there is a separate data field. If the user interface mimicked the database, there would be a separate checkbox for included/excluded. The source number field is never less than zero in a valid database. In TMGU, the filter evaluates the actual source number and does not check the S.EXCLUDE field to see if the citation is excluded. I could add a separate filter term, but no such term is available now. John

Gosh, Terry, I also exclude such citations but never thought about searching for them. On a quick check I can't (yet?) find a way either. I even looked at TMGU with its actions on Citations and tried to set its filter to Source Number is less than zero, but no matches so no help. As I am sure you noticed, if the Report Options are set to show excluded citations there is nothing to distinquish them from unexcluded. At the moment my only suggestion is to run two reports to Word, one where you do and one where you do not show excluded citations. Then use the Word facility to show the differences between the two reports. Let us know if you discover something better, Michael

I sometimes find a source that is clearly a derivative of an earlier source. If I can't find the original at the time I may cite the derivative source. If I later find the original I cite it and exclude the citations to the derivative. I'm doing that now with a source I found some time ago and would like to be sure I've excluded all the citations to the derivative source. I can't find a report to identify citations that have or have not been excluded. Is there a filter that will find them? Terry Reigel

Ken, printers can deal with PDF files. Regards….David > On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:50 PM, <jkennethwood@bell.net> <jkennethwood@bell.net> wrote: > > I have a chart 24 inches x 36 inches. I know that a local printer does that > size. How do I prepare my file for that printer? > > > > Ken Wood > > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

At 1/20/2019 1:50 PM, jkennethwood@bell.net wrote: >I have a chart 24 inches x 36 inches. I know that a local printer does >that >size. How do I prepare my file for that printer? > In truth -- you should be asking THEM what formats they can handle, then generate the chart in one of those. (Odds are that generating a PDF with a custom page size might suffice -- Win10 includes a PDF "printer" [I have never gotten the TMG PDF printer to function since TMG 5 or 6] though you may need to use control panel to initially activate it, it's an optional feature in the OS) It may be that you'll have to install a printer driver for their printer, configured for "save to file", generate the chart, and take the raw (printer specific) file to them where upon the simply do a direct copy to the printer device (bypassing local printer drivers).

I have a chart 24 inches x 36 inches. I know that a local printer does that size. How do I prepare my file for that printer? Ken Wood

At 1/19/2019 09:42, Erik Hov wrote >When I split of a new project ,I also included the people and the ones they >were married to and had children with. But I also included the people the >relative are living with but not having any children with. I have entered >those people ,and mentioned in a "note tag" in the note field that they are >"living together". I can find those by doing a List of People report ,but >that gives me all of the ones with the phrase living together ,and that >becomes pretty many. (about 184000 in the project and the List of people >gives me about 4000 such "living together" people.)....a bit too many to go >through. Michael told you about the "#" filters which probably will solve your problem. But, let me make some comments about your situation -- TMG is unlkke most other genealogy program in how a fater and mother are treated. Other program _assume_ that the children's parents are married. In fact, you cannot add a child to a father (mother) without the wife (husband) _AND_ a Marriage Tag. TMG allows a child to have one parent without the other. Becasue of this, many TMG users are not forced to have a Marriage Tag for a child's parent(s). Many users, as have you, add Tags that relate more of the facts in the case. In this way, narrative reports can be produced that leave fewer questions to the reader. Another option for TMG users is to create a Custom Marriage Tag (with appropriate Tag & Witness Sentences) with Tag Labels, such as Marr One Nite, Marr Liason, or Marr NOT. The Tag/Witness Sentences would indicate that there was not a marriage, but that the couple had relations but did not marry. Or the Sentences note that the couple lived together for a period of time, but never married. If these Custom Tag(s) are created in the Marriage Tag Group then TMG treats the couple as having been married. For narrative reports, this is not a problem as the Sentences report the situation as you wish. However, for chart-type reports (including Family Group Sheets (FGS)) the couple is definitely treated as married using whatever date/place is entered in the Tag. On FGS and reports displaying the Tag Label, the treatment is not too bad for the user although it might mislead a reader unless the reader is warned. There are many ppossibilities using this method. Some users like it and othgers do not. Lee

Thanks a lot ,that solved it all!. I knew it....it had to be something I overlooked. That gave 72 people ,not 4000!!. I just hadn`t found the right filter among all the possibilities! -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Michael J. Hannah [mailto:mjh@rr-nm.net] Sendt: 19. januar 2019 18:19 Til: tmg@rootsweb.com Emne: [TMG] Re: filter for people without children ,marriage or parents... Erik asked: > What I would need is a filter to find the following: > People without children ,marriage or parents, and with a note saying > they are "living with". > The last part of this filter would be Memo//Memo// starts with// > living together Hi Erik, What you are overlooking are the many Filter conditions on the List of People report which start with a number sign '#'. So what you want are: # of Children // = Equals // 0 // AND # of Marriage Group tags // = Equals // 0 // AND # of Parents // = Equals // 0 // AND Memo // Memo // begins with // living together // END Hope this give you ideas, Michael _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Erik asked: > What I would need is a filter to find the following: > People without children ,marriage or parents, > and with a note saying they are "living with". > The last part of this filter would be > Memo//Memo// starts with// living together Hi Erik, What you are overlooking are the many Filter conditions on the List of People report which start with a number sign '#'. So what you want are: # of Children // = Equals // 0 // AND # of Marriage Group tags // = Equals // 0 // AND # of Parents // = Equals // 0 // AND Memo // Memo // begins with // living together // END Hope this give you ideas, Michael

Wonder what filter I can use for finding: When I split of a new project ,I also included the people and the ones they were married to and had children with. But I also included the people the relative are living with but not having any children with. I have entered those people ,and mentioned in a "note tag" in the note field that they are "living together". I can find those by doing a List of People report ,but that gives me all of the ones with the phrase living together ,and that becomes pretty many. (about 184000 in the project and the List of people gives me about 4000 such "living together" people.)....a bit too many to go through. Not sure if it is an easier way? What I would need is a filter to find the following: People without children ,marriage or parents ,and with a note saying they are "living with". The last part of this filter would be Memo//Memo// starts with// living together ,but I am not sure about the first part. I don`t really need those few people with this criteria (it is a lot less than 4000!) ,and had thought of deleting those few people ,but first make a note on the relative that he/she was living together with the person to be deleted.... Erik

Just letting people know that the normal Maintenance routine solved my problem. I'm unsure why I didn't try that first--many thanks to the list for nudging me in the obvious direction! Karla Huebner calypsospots AT gmail.com On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 6:43 AM Richard Damon <Richard@damon-family.org> wrote: > On 1/12/19 12:39 AM, Karla Huebner wrote: > > I just did a simple filter for the Project Explorer--"Is a Descendant" of > > ID# 14999, a relative born in 1850 who had grandchildren by at least four > > of her children, and was startled to get only 22 results. I might have > > believed this, but a fellow researcher should have been on the list, and > > wasn't, and I soon ascertained that two of her siblings were while she > and > > two others were not. The two who did show, had no birth dates and showed > up > > twice each on the list, while the three who didn't show did have birth > > dates. Also, no one else on the list was alive or lacking a birthdate. > > > > Any ideas what's going on here? I'm not seeing any pattern I can > understand. > > > > Karla Huebner > > calypsospots AT gmail.com > > I would first run the maintanance routine Validate File Integrety, and > then I would double check that the relationships have been marked > primary, so that the relationship shows up in the Father or Mother box > of the child. > > -- > Richard Damon > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Please, Can anyone tell me how I can change these paths. They are referring to an area I wish to Delete/move. Thanks Andrew Clark 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathDNA = (+) C:\Users\Desktop\AppData\Roaming\The Master Genealogist v9\ 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathIni = (+) C:\Users\Desktop\AppData\Roaming\The Master Genealogist v9\ 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathReportCfg = (+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Configuration_files 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathReportOut = (+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Report_output 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathExhibits = (+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Exhibits 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathSlideshow = (+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Slideshow 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathGEDCOMoutput=(+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Export 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathBackups =(+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Backups 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathTimelines =(+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Timelines 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathLogs =(+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Logs 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathLayouts =(+) C:\Users\Desktop\AppData\Roaming\The Master Genealogist v9\ 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathProjects =(+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Projects 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathSample =(+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Projects\Sample 19-01-19, 17:35:11 >gcPathRepeat =(+) C:\Users\Desktop\OneDrive\Europe 2016\DelMe\The Master Genealogist v9\Repeat_files

Looks like RootsWeb stripped out my graphic with the error message which stated: "An error happened when opening the data tables...File c:\Users\...\Projects\Claussen_E.dbf not found" Fred On Friday, January 18, 2019, 7:13:46 PM PST, Fred Claussen <fclausse@pacbell.net> wrote: Hi Everyone: I have been a major TMG user since version 5.0 and have only recently had the following problem.  This happened once a few months ago and I successfully restored from my prior BU and only lost a couple of hours work.  I considered it a "one off" but it has just happened again so I am hoping that someone can tell me what I might be doing wrong or how I can avoid the problem in the future. Running TMG 9.05 under Windows 7 Home Premium Sequence of events: Time for dinner so I started into my BU/Close process: Optimize and then Re-Index then run VFI then BU then Close Optimize completes as normal. Re-Index does not complete (does not even start?) with a message "Project is in use elsewhere." TMG then closes (without my asking it to do so as I remember it). Re-open TMG and get the statement that Repair Mode has been Activated. Attempt to re-open my main project (the one that closed while attempting to re-index) and get the following message: As I remember it this is the same sequence of events and the same messages when I went through this the first time a few months ago. I do not know what (if anything) I am doing wrong but I need to take all steps necessary to avoid this in the future.   Thoughts or suggestions? Thanks, Fred Claussen _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/tmg@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community