I am looking for a ship's log for this ship, as I wonder if one of the passengers (see below) died on the voyage but was not crossed off on the list, and no notation was made under "remarks". This is what we know: S.S. Gulf of Carpentaria from London to Hobart, sailed [looks like] 10th December 1883, arrived 3rd February 1884. Sharp family including F127 Sharp, Sarah, 44, C of E, R&W, Leeds England, on whose application: Joseph Sharp; remarks: Gone on shore. " , Harold, 11, C of E, R&W, Leeds, [etc., same as Sarah] " , Robert, 9 [etc.] " , Maggie, 7 [etc.] " , Cecil, 2 [he is listed as 2, but was 3; also listed as female instead of male] ***** see my question below M128 Sharp, Augustus P., 13 [etc.] F129 Sharp, Sarah, 22, [etc.], needlewoman F130 Sharp, Alice E., 20 [etc.], needlewoman F131 Sharp, Florence B., 14 [etc.]. F183 [?] Sharp, Lilian, 16 [etc.], with F127; Mr. Joseph Sharp Parkville House Hobart will receive her. ***** We are trying to find out if this Cecil died on the voyage. I realize that the name should have been crossed off and a notation made under remarks", but barring that would there have been a notation in the ship's log? We are trying to figure out if this Cecil is the "Circy" 11 mos. (or yrs. -- can't make out that abbreviation) that accompanied some of the family to Honolulu from Sydney in July 1894 on the S.S. Alameda. Ships' lists are often wrong with the ages, and these are no exceptions, but this Circy doesn t fit if it is 11 months and doesn't fit if it is 11 years, and no Cecil to Honolulu. Also, the Circy to Honolulu is just "child" - no gender. (Cecil was born in Leeds Oct 1880; definitely a male). I will post this latter under another subject, too. Any suggestions for where I should go next? Thanks. Marie