It is important to remember that the entries in the Relationship column refer to the head of the household, not to the entry on the line above. So, in the case of Charles PRICHARD, he is shown on HO107/1572 folio 375b as the Brother of William PRICHARD, a Bootmaker who is married with children, whose entry appears as head of the household on the previous page, i.e. folio 375a. So, Charles PRICHARD, aged 19 and a Bootmaker, is not the brother of the apprentice, James DAVEY. For 1841, have you taken a look at the entry at ref HO107/1083/4 folio 47b? This is for Charles PRITCHARD aged 8, the son of William PRITCHARD, a Boot & Shoe Cleaver. The age is almost spot-on and the trade could well have been handed down from father to sons. Best wishes, Marion Woolgar Bognor Regis, West Sussex