Twenty two years ago in 1991, my husband and I (not meant to sound royal!!) enumerated two parts of a council estate in Wigan - approximately 200 households each. We found some quite interesting responses. As advised we left the papers one day within a specified time slot and collected them a few days after the official census day. We saw many people on the doorstep. We told them that all people resident on the given night should be recorded. 1. Do I include the baby? Madam, the baby IS a person! 2. Do I include the dog/cat/hanster? Madam, They are NOT people! 3. "I am telling you nothing. It is nobody's business!" When my husband returned this character had been to the pub where people had told him "You silly fool; it is a legal requirement. They will put you in prison if you don't reply!" 4. One of mine "They're all gone, dead and gone" He was clearly suffering from dementia, and with the agreement of the Chief enumerator I filled in the form as best I could by observation, a comment or two from neighbours, with annotations all over the form. 5. "They knew where I was in 1939. They can come and find me now!!" 6. One of my elderly ladies: "Well I will put it all down, but I don't see why. I am 98 and will not need schools and things now." 7. My son is away in the army. Do I include him? And many other such questions. People were helpful, aggressive, open, suspicious, intelligent and not! It was hard on the feet, sometimes amusing, and sometimes irritating. I would willingly do it again, but am beyond the age limit and no longer in the UK! Jean Wood http://www.cheziris.eu/index.htm http://www.cheziris.eu/Duterrau.htm http://www.saintes-fleur-de-sel.fr/index.htm > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:19:16 +0000 > From: ovington.one@gmail.com > To: sussex-plus@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [SXP] Two census records for the same person > > Hi Steve > > Wherever humans are involved there is the ability for them to make a > cock up of it <g> > > In theory the census was a snapshot of each household on one day > > In practice a form (schedule) was left at each household by the > enumerator a week or so before the census > > Some householders filled it in immediately for those they thought would > be in home on census night > > Others left it to the last minute or anywhere inbetween > > Some misunderstood the instructions and filled in those who would > normally live there > > Again in theory, the instructions called for those at home, there was no > censorship for any sort of relationship, what the householder or whoever > they coerced into doing it, put down what they thought was required, > some altered ages, others mistook the place of birth etc etc > > Those schedules were then collected after census day and transcribed by > the enumerator > > So there are many avenues for mistakes and errors to creep in along the way > > I have also known there to be an overlap between to enumerators > districts where both leave a schedule at the same house so they get > enumerated twice > > I have several people in more than one place, I also have people with > the wrong surname, first name ages, relationships and anything else that > could be incorrectly recorded > > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 23/12/2013 07:44, Steve Tusler wrote: >> Hello Listers, >> >> I recall in the past a conversation where it was possible for one person to >> be on two census records in the same year. >> >> >> >> I know they are geographically close (Itchingfield & Ifield) but is it >> possible that somebody could be on the following two references If they were >> done on different days? >> >> >> >> HO 107/1096/1 page 13 >> >> HO 107/1095/13 page 24 >> >> >> >> I had originally only looked at the census from Ifield but recently started >> using the alternate Surname spelling (Trusler) that is more prevalent the >> further back you go in time and it fills in some gaps with others on the >> same page. >> >> Allen Trusler appears to be living with his future wife Martha Penfold who >> was 15 at the time, is it normal to show non married couples living >> together? >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Steve Tusler >> >> Sydney >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Hi Stella In the UK the census is not taken on the door step as it is in the US Here a form is left a week or so in advance of the census day It could of course be filled in at any point along the way until collected the day or so after the appointed census day Whilst a few were taken verbally when the householder was illiterate and was unable to find help from a friend or neighbour to fill in the schedule, these were few compared to the many who filled them in as requested The most common occurrence I have found of people in two places are mariners, their wives seem to have entered them as head of household, even when at sea But there are many mistakes in the census for a multitude of reasons Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 23/12/2013 08:28, Stella Stanger wrote: > > > Hi . A person might appear on the same census - different > location . if they were at both residences when the census was > taken. [over a few days ?] > Also have heard - that when census was taken- if asked who lieved at > the residence - may mention the name of a person - not at the > residence at the particular time. Not what should happen - but - it > possibly did on occasion. > > Re: Allen TRUSLER living with future wife Martha PENFOLD - age 15. > Perhaps he was just visiting the residence - If this was on Census > day - he would have been included - as being at the residence - not > necessarily living there.
Hi again You didn't mention the census year (1841 & 1851 are both HO107) and only a partial reference First two as transcribed on Ancestry Remembering also that ages should be rounded down to the nearest whole five for those above 15 in 1841 1841 England Census about Catherine Knight Name: Catherine Knight Age: 35 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1806 Gender: Female Where born: Sussex, England Civil Parish: Ifield Hundred: Burbeach County/Island: Sussex Country: England Registration District: Horsham Sub-registration District: North Neighbors: View others on page Piece: 1095 Book: 13 Folio: 24 Page Number: 2 Household Members: Name Age Catherine Knight 35 Ann Sayers 15 Allin Tusler 25 Isaac Jenkins 15 William Holdor 15 Benjamin Banks 15 Edward Penfold 13 Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 1095; Book: 13; Civil Parish: Ifield; County: Sussex; Enumeration District: 12; Folio: 24; Page: 2; Line: 13; GSU roll: 474672. ================= 1841 England Census about Allen Trusler Name: Allen Trusler Age: 25 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1816 Gender: Male Where born: Sussex, England Civil Parish: Itchingfield Hundred: East Easwrith County/Island: Sussex Country: England Registration District: Horsham Sub-registration District: South Neighbors: View others on page Piece: 1096 Book: 1 Folio: 9 Page Number: 13 Household Members: Name Age Allen Trusler 25 Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 1096; Book: 1; Civil Parish: Itchingfield; County: Sussex; Enumeration District: 9; Folio: 9; Page: 13; Line: 20; GSU roll: 474673. ==================== He is incorrectly enumerated on his own as above, whereas he is living with Hannah TRUSLER 55 (who may or may not be his mother as relationships are not recorded in 1841) The household in full is :- // Hannah TRUSLER 55 widow of Ag Lab Hannah TRUSLER 20 George TRUSLER 6 Stephen TRUSLER 4 Allen TRUSLER 25 Ag Lab / John HOLLOWAY 22 Ag Lab Martha PENFOLD 15 // All born in County where enumerated You will see from the above that John HOLLOWAY & Martha PENFOLD are in a separate part of the same building From the above I would say that Allen TUSLER or TRUSLER worked with the Catharine KNIGHT and others for William GARARD 65 farmer Like many farm labourers he would live in for part or all of the week So he has either been enumerated there as that is where he normally lived or with Hannah TUSLER as that was his home when not working Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 23/12/2013 07:44, Steve Tusler wrote: > Hello Listers, > > I recall in the past a conversation where it was possible for one person to > be on two census records in the same year. > > > > I know they are geographically close (Itchingfield & Ifield) but is it > possible that somebody could be on the following two references If they were > done on different days? > > > > HO 107/1096/1 page 13 > > HO 107/1095/13 page 24 > > > > I had originally only looked at the census from Ifield but recently started > using the alternate Surname spelling (Trusler) that is more prevalent the > further back you go in time and it fills in some gaps with others on the > same page. > > Allen Trusler appears to be living with his future wife Martha Penfold who > was 15 at the time, is it normal to show non married couples living > together? > > > > Regards > > Steve Tusler > > Sydney
Hi Steve Wherever humans are involved there is the ability for them to make a cock up of it <g> In theory the census was a snapshot of each household on one day In practice a form (schedule) was left at each household by the enumerator a week or so before the census Some householders filled it in immediately for those they thought would be in home on census night Others left it to the last minute or anywhere inbetween Some misunderstood the instructions and filled in those who would normally live there Again in theory, the instructions called for those at home, there was no censorship for any sort of relationship, what the householder or whoever they coerced into doing it, put down what they thought was required, some altered ages, others mistook the place of birth etc etc Those schedules were then collected after census day and transcribed by the enumerator So there are many avenues for mistakes and errors to creep in along the way I have also known there to be an overlap between to enumerators districts where both leave a schedule at the same house so they get enumerated twice I have several people in more than one place, I also have people with the wrong surname, first name ages, relationships and anything else that could be incorrectly recorded Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 23/12/2013 07:44, Steve Tusler wrote: > Hello Listers, > > I recall in the past a conversation where it was possible for one person to > be on two census records in the same year. > > > > I know they are geographically close (Itchingfield & Ifield) but is it > possible that somebody could be on the following two references If they were > done on different days? > > > > HO 107/1096/1 page 13 > > HO 107/1095/13 page 24 > > > > I had originally only looked at the census from Ifield but recently started > using the alternate Surname spelling (Trusler) that is more prevalent the > further back you go in time and it fills in some gaps with others on the > same page. > > Allen Trusler appears to be living with his future wife Martha Penfold who > was 15 at the time, is it normal to show non married couples living > together? > > > > Regards > > Steve Tusler > > Sydney > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >
Hi . A person might appear on the same census - different location . if they were at both residences when the census was taken. [over a few days ?] Also have heard - that when census was taken- if asked who lieved at the residence - may mention the name of a person - not at the residence at the particular time. Not what should happen - but - it possibly did on occasion. Re: Allen TRUSLER living with future wife Martha PENFOLD - age 15. Perhaps he was just visiting the residence - If this was on Census day - he would have been included - as being at the residence - not necessarily living there. At 11:44 PM 22/12/2013, Steve Tusler wrote: >Hello Listers, > >I recall in the past a conversation where it was possible for one person to >be on two census records in the same year. > > > >I know they are geographically close (Itchingfield & Ifield) but is it >possible that somebody could be on the following two references If they were >done on different days? > > > >HO 107/1096/1 page 13 > >HO 107/1095/13 page 24 > > > >I had originally only looked at the census from Ifield but recently started >using the alternate Surname spelling (Trusler) that is more prevalent the >further back you go in time and it fills in some gaps with others on the >same page. > >Allen Trusler appears to be living with his future wife Martha Penfold who >was 15 at the time, is it normal to show non married couples living >together? > > > >Regards > >Steve Tusler > >Sydney > > > > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without >the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Thank for letting us know Marion. We tend to forget in this day and age of the internet just how much we relied on people like Sue and Nigel in the early days. Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marion Woolgar" <listmail008@btinternet.com> To: <sussex-plus-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 7:38 AM Subject: [SXP] Sue Bayley >I have just been shocked to learn of the sudden and untimely death of Sue > Bayley on 14 November. Sue was the 'S' in S&N Genealogies and she and her > husband Nigel were real trail blazers in supplying family tree programs > and > data sets. Later on, they created The Genealogist subscription site. > Before S&N, you had to import any family tree programs from the USA, you > simply couldn't buy them in the UK. > > I have been a customer of S&N for what must be nearly 20 years. S&N were > regular exhibitors at family history fairs and their stands just grew and > grew over the years, especially after they started to release the 1841 to > 1901 census returns on CD sets by county. S&N were at the West Surrey > Open > Day at Woking on 26 October and I spoke to Sue about their planned new > data > releases for next year, and made the inevitable purchases of data Cd's to > add to my collection. She seemed fine then, so news of her death seems > all > the more shocking. She will be greatly missed and my heart goes out to > her > husband and sons. > > Best wishes, > > Marion Woolgar > Bognor Regis, West Sussex > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message
I have just been shocked to learn of the sudden and untimely death of Sue Bayley on 14 November. Sue was the 'S' in S&N Genealogies and she and her husband Nigel were real trail blazers in supplying family tree programs and data sets. Later on, they created The Genealogist subscription site. Before S&N, you had to import any family tree programs from the USA, you simply couldn't buy them in the UK. I have been a customer of S&N for what must be nearly 20 years. S&N were regular exhibitors at family history fairs and their stands just grew and grew over the years, especially after they started to release the 1841 to 1901 census returns on CD sets by county. S&N were at the West Surrey Open Day at Woking on 26 October and I spoke to Sue about their planned new data releases for next year, and made the inevitable purchases of data Cd's to add to my collection. She seemed fine then, so news of her death seems all the more shocking. She will be greatly missed and my heart goes out to her husband and sons. Best wishes, Marion Woolgar Bognor Regis, West Sussex
Hi Pam................ I think it might be Maudlin an old hamlet in West Sussex ........... no doubt someone will confirm yhis. Joe -----Original Message----- From: PMR Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 2:48 PM To: SFHG Mailing List ; SSX-PLUS Mailing List Subject: [SXP] Barnard BOURN - 'Of Mawdlyne' Greetings Listers When my 9 x ggf, Barnard (or Barnett) BOURN was buried at St Clement's Hastings on 29 Oct 1600, he was described as 'of Mawdlyne'. Could someone who is more familiar with Hastings that I am tell me what this refers to please? Other churches that I'm aware of existing at the time were All Saints' and possibly St Mary in the Castle. Could St Mary's have been dedicated to St Mary Magdalene (Mawdlyne) rather than any other Mary? If anyone else has BOURN connections in Hastings, I'd be delighted to hear from you. Many thanks Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Greetings Listers When my 9 x ggf, Barnard (or Barnett) BOURN was buried at St Clement's Hastings on 29 Oct 1600, he was described as 'of Mawdlyne'. Could someone who is more familiar with Hastings that I am tell me what this refers to please? Other churches that I'm aware of existing at the time were All Saints' and possibly St Mary in the Castle. Could St Mary's have been dedicated to St Mary Magdalene (Mawdlyne) rather than any other Mary? If anyone else has BOURN connections in Hastings, I'd be delighted to hear from you. Many thanks Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia.
Mawdlyn or any other variation is how Magdalene is pronounced (presumably it is in brackets after Magdalene to help the uninitiated). St Mary in the Castle is a different parish to St Mary Magdalene which I think is technically now in St Leonards-on-Sea but goodness knows how it could have been classified in the 1600s. Keith On 02/12/2013 04:18, joboy wrote: > Hi Pam................ I think it might be Maudlin an old hamlet in West > Sussex ........... no doubt someone will confirm yhis. > Joe > > -----Original Message----- > From: PMR > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 2:48 PM > To: SFHG Mailing List ; SSX-PLUS Mailing List > Subject: [SXP] Barnard BOURN - 'Of Mawdlyne' > > Greetings Listers > > When my 9 x ggf, Barnard (or Barnett) BOURN was buried at St > Clement's Hastings on 29 Oct 1600, he was described as 'of Mawdlyne'. > > Could someone who is more familiar with Hastings that I am tell > me what this refers to please? Other churches that I'm aware of existing at > the time were All Saints' and possibly St Mary in the Castle. Could St > Mary's have been dedicated to St Mary Magdalene (Mawdlyne) rather than any > other Mary? > > If anyone else has BOURN connections in Hastings, I'd be > delighted to hear from you. > > Many thanks > > Pam > Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >
On 21/11/2013 23:57, PMR wrote: > Greetings Listers > > I have recently changed computers and find I now have two email addresses for ESRO. > > Archives@eastsussex.gov.uk and Archives@eastsussexcc.gov.uk > > Which is correct please? This is now the correct one: thekeep@eastsussex.gov.uk ESRO moved to The Keep on 19 Nov and is open now to the public http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/leisureandtourism/localandfamilyhistory/esro/collections/default.htm or use a search engine to find East Sussex Record Office -- Connie http://oursalmons.wordpress.com/
Greetings Listers I have recently changed computers and find I now have two email addresses for ESRO. Archives@eastsussex.gov.uk and Archives@eastsussexcc.gov.uk Which is correct please? Many thanks. Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia.
Regular users of the Sussex Family History Group library will know that both the library at Lewes and East Sussex Record Office have been closed for some time, pending the move to The Keep, at Falmer, just outside Brighton. The Keep is a state of the art archive holding the collections of East Sussex Record Office, the Royal Pavilion & Museums Local History Collections and the University of Sussex Special Collections, together with the SFHG library. Full details of The Keep are on the web site, at www.thekeep.info , including details of how to find us. The good news is that we have completed the move and The Keep will be opening to the public tomorrow, 19th November, from 9.30am to 5pm. The Keep is open Tuesday to Friday 9.3am to 5pm and 9,30am to 4pm on Saturday. Currently our own opening hours are a little limited, as the SFHG library is a separate unit within the building, and we are dependent on volunteer helpers to guide visitors around our collections and also to assist with research, where possible. We would welcome any suitable volunteers, who must be current members of SFHG. If you visit the Keep and are interested in helping or finding out more about what it involves, please contact one of our current volunteers at The Keep, or email our Librarian, Allison Caffyn, at librarian@sfhg,org.uk or me at grayscroft@gmail.com . See http://www.sfhg.org.uk/library.html for information on our collections; the full catalogue is currently being updated and should be available on the web site soon. Steve Selby
Hi Pam, That last post didn't look too good! Try these Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: Place: Balcombe, West Sussex Date: 17 Jun 1576 Subject: William GREENFEILD Spouse: Margaret PUTTOCKE Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: Place: Billingshurst, West Sussex Date: 25 Nov 1578 William GREENFIELD, Danks Spouse: Mary GREENFIELD, by South Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: Place: West Grinstead, West Sussex Date: 25 Jun 1580 Subject: William GREENFIELD Spouse: Elizabeth PICKE Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: Place: Billingshurst, West Sussex Date: 25 Aug 1584 Subject: William GREENFIELD Spouse: Agnes BURRELL hth, Anne Joan GREENFIELD, the daughter of William GREENFIELD, was baptised in St Nicholas's Church Arundel in Sussex on 14th August 1586. I'd love to find the marriage of her parents, William and maybe Margaret. William GREENFIELD buried at St Nicholas's on 7th February 1634 may be the same guy and Margaret GREENFIELD buried there on 20th March 1637 may have been his wife - unfortunately she is not described in her entry in the SFHG Database. I'm still trying to get my SMI CD working - it doesn't like Windows 7 and my old laptop is not yet co-operating! Is anyone able to check for the marriage please? Joan married Thomas MARSH in Lyminster on 13th November 1609. Many thanks. Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia.
Hi Pam,<BR> <BR>Still having problems? Try these<BR> <BR>Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index:<br>Place: Balcombe, West Sussex, Date: 17 Jun 1576:<br>Subject: William GREENFEILD<br>Spouse: Margaret PUTTOCKE<br> <br>Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index:<br>Place: Billingshurst, West Sussex, Date: 25 Nov 1578:<br>Subject: William GREENFIELD, Danks<br>Spouse: Mary GREENFIELD, by South<br> <br>Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index:<br>Place: West Grinstead, West Sussex, Date: 25 Jun 1580:<br>Subject: William GREENFIELD<br>Spouse: Elizabeth PICKE<br> <br>Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index:<br>Place: Billingshurst, West Sussex, Date: 25 Aug 1584:<br>Subject: William GREENFIELD<br>Spouse: Agnes BURRELL<br> <br>hth, Anne<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>---------------------------------------- > From: cliveden@iinet.net.au > To: SFHG-L@rootsweb.com; SUSSEX-PLUS-L@rootsweb.com > Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:16:16 +1000 > Subject: [SXP] William GREENFIELD - marriage > > Greetings Listers > > Joan GREENFIELD, the daughter of William GREENFIELD, was baptised in St Nicholas's Church Arundel in Sussex on 14th August 1586. I'd love to find the marriage of her parents, William and maybe Margaret. William GREENFIELD buried at St Nicholas's on 7th February 1634 may be the same guy and Margaret GREENFIELD buried there on 20th March 1637 may have been his wife - unfortunately she is not described in her entry in the SFHG Database. > > I'm still trying to get my SMI CD working - it doesn't like Windows 7 and my old laptop is not yet co-operating! Is anyone able to check for the marriage please? > > Joan married Thomas MARSH in Lyminster on 13th November 1609. > > Many thanks. > > Pam > Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia. > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUSSEX-PLUS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message <BR>
Greetings Listers Further to my previous posting, I've found there are two possible baptisms in the SFHG database for a Joan GREENFIELD old enough to have married in 1609, as follows: Entry from Arundel St Nicholas 1560 - 1606 Ch First names Joan Surname GREENFEILD Sex d Baptism Date 14-Aug Baptism Year 1586 Father first names William Father surname GREENFEILD Town Arundel County West Sussex Recorded father first names Willm Entry from Billingshurst St Mary the Virgin 1591 - 1666 Ch First names Joan Surname GREENFEILD Sex d Baptism Date 20-May Baptism Year 1594 Father first names Robert Father surname GREENFEILD Abode Pryors Town Billingshurst County West Sussex Recorded first names Jone As Arundel is only 2 miles from Lyminster where Joan was married, as against 13.6 miles from Billingshurst, I am inclined towards the first one, but that may not necessarily be so. It may be Robert's marriage that I'm looking for! Any comments would be appreciated. Cheers Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia.
Greetings Listers Joan GREENFIELD, the daughter of William GREENFIELD, was baptised in St Nicholas's Church Arundel in Sussex on 14th August 1586. I'd love to find the marriage of her parents, William and maybe Margaret. William GREENFIELD buried at St Nicholas's on 7th February 1634 may be the same guy and Margaret GREENFIELD buried there on 20th March 1637 may have been his wife - unfortunately she is not described in her entry in the SFHG Database. I'm still trying to get my SMI CD working - it doesn't like Windows 7 and my old laptop is not yet co-operating! Is anyone able to check for the marriage please? Joan married Thomas MARSH in Lyminster on 13th November 1609. Many thanks. Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia.
Sorry I should have also said, I have added a correction to both Ancestry and Freebmd Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 13/11/2013 22:42, Nivard Ovington wrote: > I was a tad baffled why it didn't show up on freebmd > > But its on as Willam not William > > Births Mar 1905 > Pearce Willam Albert K Hastings 2b 13 > > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)
I was a tad baffled why it didn't show up on freebmd But its on as Willam not William Births Mar 1905 Pearce Willam Albert K Hastings 2b 13 Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 13/11/2013 22:36, Nivard Ovington wrote: > Hi Bob > > It is probably this one > > > England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 about Willam Albert K > Pearce > Name: Willam Albert K Pearce > Date of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar 1905 > Registration District: Hastings > Inferred County: Sussex > Volume: 2b > Page: 13 > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > On 13/11/2013 22:27, Bob Pearce wrote: >> Hello Fellow Researchers, >> >> Could someone send me the entry for the birth of WILLIAM >> ALBERT KENT PEARCE who was born in Hastings, Sussex, sometime in >> 1905? It doesn't seem to be in the FreeBMD index. He was a cousin of >> my father's. It appears that he married in 1929 and died in 1939 at >> age 34. >> >> Thank you for any assistance. >> >> Bob Pearce USA >
Hi Bob It is probably this one England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 about Willam Albert K Pearce Name: Willam Albert K Pearce Date of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar 1905 Registration District: Hastings Inferred County: Sussex Volume: 2b Page: 13 Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 13/11/2013 22:27, Bob Pearce wrote: > Hello Fellow Researchers, > > Could someone send me the entry for the birth of WILLIAM ALBERT KENT PEARCE who was born in Hastings, Sussex, sometime in 1905? It doesn't seem to be in the FreeBMD index. He was a cousin of my father's. It appears that he married in 1929 and died in 1939 at age 34. > > Thank you for any assistance. > > Bob Pearce USA