Having had a ferret around I suspect your are looking at Plynlimmon Rd Hastings, East Sussex TN34 When you bring up a 1911 page, look above (in findmypast) for "list" which is the RG78 enumerators summary which gives (in his hand) a list of the streets/roads which is usually more readable than the householders writing on the schedule Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Can some kind person please decipher the name of the road/street on the 1911 > Census for me. > > The reference is RG14PN4744RG78PN203RD69SD2ED14SN51 > > > No hurry but I have no idea what it is meant to be. The transcription > reads: Plynlunion Road Sussex. > > > Many thanks. > > Judy Berntsen > New Zealand

Hi Judy What is the name & details of the person you seek? There is no transcript as quoted on Ancestry where are you finding it? Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Can some kind person please decipher the name of the road/street on the 1911 > Census for me. > > The reference is RG14PN4744RG78PN203RD69SD2ED14SN51 > > > No hurry but I have no idea what it is meant to be. The transcription > reads: Plynlunion Road Sussex. > > > Many thanks. > > Judy Berntsen > New Zealand

Hi Heather, A Frederick Turner was baptised 12/12/1819 at St Pancras, father Phillip, mother Sarah. A Philip Turner was baptised at the same church 25/12/1801, father Philip, mother Margaret - he could have been baptised when he was a few years old. Both are on familysearch.org. hth, Anne > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 05:53:56 +0100 > Subject: [SXP] Philip TURNER > > Hi, looking for the baptism of Philip Turner, born 1795 Chichester on the 1881 census, and Frederick Turner born abt 1821 Chichester, father Phillip. > Frederick married Amelia in 1843, son Thomas? > Thanks Heather > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi, looking for the baptism of Philip Turner, born 1795 Chichester on the 1881 census, and Frederick Turner born abt 1821 Chichester, father Phillip. Frederick married Amelia in 1843, son Thomas? Thanks Heather

Good afternoon list. I am looking for the marriage of RICHARD TYHURST to a MARY PAGE or maybe a MARY BAKER. I would think that the marriage would have taken place in either Ore or Hastings. Their first 3 children were born in the UK before they emigrated to Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada in 1823 MARY ANN TYHURST christened 13th Feb: 1820 Ore, Hastings. CAROLINE TYHURST christened 2nd Dec: 1821. Ore Hastings.. RICHARD TYHURST. christened 3rd Aug: 1823. Ore Hastings. I have looked in every nook and cranny for reference to a marriage for these two persons but as yet nothing. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you in advance. John Tyhurst Member 6075

To Nick Leppard, Your Mary Dumbrell could possibly be related to my Thomas, either an elder sister or more likely an aunt. I have no more information on Thomas other than marriage in Horsted Keynes in 1778 and approximate birth or 1753.

Can anyone help with tracking down Elizabeth Horton's family. She was supposedly born in Hellingly in 1783 and later died in Brighton in 1856 after raising a family with John Dumbrell. Her father was possibly William Horton, have no details on her mother at all.

I'm looking for a marriage of John Gibbs to Mary ? circa 1784 first child, Sam, born 1785 in Laughton, Sussex. I've picked up a marriage of John Gibbs and Mary Eldridge in Brede and now think that's the wrong John & Mary Gibbs. If anyone can help, it would be most apprreciated. Thanks. Catherine

Hi I have a Mary DUMBRELL born in Horstead Keynes; she won't be the daughter of your Thomas and Mary as she married Richard LEOPARD 3rd December 1761 in Horstead Keynes. Unfortunately I don't have a birth date for Mary but she died about 1809 in West Hoathly. Any further information on my Mary would be appreciated - was she related to your Thomas DUMBRELL? Many thanks Nick Leppard

Anyone researching the MARLOW family from Northiam. Particularly interested in John MARLOW born c1801. He married Jane Lovell HOTCHKISS in 1825 at St George Hanover Square in London. He was a baker and his family were all born in London. Census has him born in Northiam. His eldest son was Valentine James born 1829. Was John any connection with Valentine MARLOW born Northiam c1766. John appears to have a sister Hannah born 1806 who was married to a William SHARMAN. They are in New Thame, Oxfordshire in 1851 and John and Jane's eldest daughter is with them. I have all the census info for John and Jane and their family, plus info from London PRs. Ian C

On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 16:58:04 +0100 Connie Sparrow <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Connie, > I think it is better not to use an address book at all. I understand > any address can be used from anywhere on an infected computer such as > a saved list mail with useful information. That's true, but in this instance it's not their computer that's been got at, it's hotmail's. Their systems have been compromised. In such matters, google seem to have their systems far better set up. They don't seem to be anywhere near as susceptible to attack at hotmail, msn, et al. > I had one of the mails with no subject and just a URL from a cousin > who uses Hotmail. I used Twitter to alert him. As good a method as any. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" But they didn't tell him the first two didn't count Tin Soldiers - Stiff Little Fingers

Brad Rogers wrote: > Largely affecting hotmail users, but also users of yahoo, msn, live or > aol. So far, google doesn't seem affected. > > Best remedy is to not use any of those services. If you must, don't > use the address books they offer. I think it is better not to use an address book at all. I understand any address can be used from anywhere on an infected computer such as a saved list mail with useful information. I had one of the mails with no subject and just a URL from a cousin who uses Hotmail. I used Twitter to alert him. Connie in London

The same happened early this morning (GMT) on the Lincs list. Richard Brown Sent from my iPad On 18 Sep 2011, at 15:32, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:08:06 +0100 (BST) > From: John Phillips <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [SXP] hi [email protected] > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > It's happened on the Cambridgeshire list as well. Different source. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Connie Sparrow <[email protected]> > To: Jean Wood <[email protected]> > Cc: Sussex roots web <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, 18 September 2011, 10:24 > Subject: Re: [SXP] hi [email protected] > > Jean Wood wrote: >> I think Lindas email has been contaminated - hacked into > > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:37:21 +0100 > From: "Julie Cheesman" <[email protected]> > Subject: [SXP] Beware Compromised Sx+ subscriber addresses > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hello All > > The addresses of at least two Sussex-Plus subscribers using Hotmail have > been compromised recently. The known addresses are now blocked from sending > further messages to the list but others may also have been taken over. Other > types of address may also get affected. > > Messages sent to the list claiming to be from the subscribers addresses have > contained a link to websites which should not be clicked on. > > Never click on any link advertised in such messages without running a check > through your anti-virus program. Make sure its definitions are completely > up-to-date. Mine automatically updates its definitions several times every > day, yours should as well. > > Protect yourself and your computer by alway being very cautious about > accessing any unrequested website links whether via mailing lists or in > personally addressed emails. > > Julie, Sussex-Plus list administrator > >

On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:00:01 -0600 "William G. Bates" <[email protected]> wrote: Hello William, > trap set by whomever sent this email. The only proper way to handle > them is to DELETE WITHOUT OPENING them. Except you can't know what the message contains until you read it. Obviously, an empty subject header is a good indicator, but there are still a fair few people that send genuine messages without a subject. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" It's only the children of the ------- wealthy tend to be good looking Ugly - The Stranglers

On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:37:21 +0100 "Julie Cheesman" <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Julie, > The addresses of at least two Sussex-Plus subscribers using Hotmail Largely affecting hotmail users, but also users of yahoo, msn, live or aol. So far, google doesn't seem affected. Best remedy is to not use any of those services. If you must, don't use the address books they offer. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" It's only the children of the ------- wealthy tend to be good looking Ugly - The Stranglers

Hello All The addresses of at least two Sussex-Plus subscribers using Hotmail have been compromised recently. The known addresses are now blocked from sending further messages to the list but others may also have been taken over. Other types of address may also get affected. Messages sent to the list claiming to be from the subscribers addresses have contained a link to websites which should not be clicked on. Never click on any link advertised in such messages without running a check through your anti-virus program. Make sure its definitions are completely up-to-date. Mine automatically updates its definitions several times every day, yours should as well. Protect yourself and your computer by alway being very cautious about accessing any unrequested website links whether via mailing lists or in personally addressed emails. Julie, Sussex-Plus list administrator

Michael Burchall is about to issue two more CDs of Sussex material he has extracted and transcribed with Introductions to its history and meaning. "Sussex Poor 2 : 1801 - 1850" continues his earlier CD which included Quarter Sessions records 1661-1800 from all nine Sussex venues which took him over thirty years to compile. His latest CD is a fitting complement to the PBN Publications CD concentrating on criminals and victims 1810-1854 published initially on fiche a decade ago. Burchall's other new CD is "Sussex Convicts Transported to Australia 1789-1867" which is extracted from the National Archives original records (HO11) and many subsequent secondary sources. It gives the history of transportation back to 1248. It similarly complements Roger Davey's booklet "East Sussex Sentences of Transportation at Quarter Sessions 1790-1854" which lists the Sentences whether they were carried out or not. More details are on the SFHG website www.sfhg.org.uk/pubs-12.html . Both these CDs (and Burchall's eight other Sussex CDs) will be on the SFHG Stand at Hampshire Genealogical Society Open Day & AGM at Horndean College next Sunday 25 September 2011. Parish Register Transcription Society who produce Burchall's CDs will also be there with their other CDs of Sussex Parish Registers (over 127), Poll Books, Trade Directories, etc. Joe Bysh SFHG #5525, Publications Secretary.

ANYONE who uses the REPLY for these type of emails (Linda's) is running right into the trap set by whomever sent this email. The only proper way to handle them is to DELETE WITHOUT OPENING them. Any other action may/probably will send something to the originator (embedded but not obvious) to let him know there was action on the email and WHO sent that reply along with whom it was sent to. It is probable that Linda's email itself may not have been hacked but only here email address was co-opted and this email was sent from a computer in another country. It is also possible that the originator may be a subscriber to this, and many other, List Serve services (I have seen this type of email on quite a few here in the U.S.) and is using them to "Farm" real email addresses for use in sending PHISHING emails trying to get individuals to respond whether it be by clicking the link OR replying. Sparkgapper

Trying to track the parents of Mary Beard, born circa 1755 and Thomas Dumbrell, born circa 1753 in Sussex. They married around 1784 and had at least one child I believe by the name of John Dumbrell born circa 1784. Unfortunately dont have any clue as to where in Sussex either family may have come from. Can anyone help please.

DID U GET MY MESSAGE   Bye for now Doreen From: Heather Brooks <[email protected]> To: Rob & Tania <[email protected]>; [email protected] Sent: Saturday, 17 September 2011, 17:01 Subject: Re: [SXP] Beard / Dumbrell A Thomas Dumbrell married Mary Beard by banns at Horsted Keynes June 8th 1778, botp. Wittnesses Philip Constable and Sarah Dumbrell. Three children baptised there Richard March 14th 1779, John July 20th 1783 and Mary September 13th 1789. Regards Heather Brooks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob & Tania" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 1:21 PM Subject: [SXP] Beard / Dumbrell > Trying to track the parents of Mary Beard, born circa 1755 and Thomas > Dumbrell, born circa 1753 in Sussex. They married around 1784 and had at > least one child I believe by the name of John Dumbrell born circa 1784. > Unfortunately dont have any clue as to where in Sussex either family may > have come from. Can anyone help please. > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message