Folks, Every week or so (or whenever the digest gets to about 20 KB), I'm forwarding to the List those posts that have been "gatewayed" from RootsWeb's SUFFOLK Board that might contain information of interest to List subscribers, and here's the current "digest" of such gatewayed posts. If you wish to respond to any of these gatewayed posts, please do so by clicking on the relevant "Message Board URL:" link and NOT by responding either to the list OR to my address as the digest poster. Board posters will not see your List response unless they are also subscribed to the List, and most are not. PLEASE also be careful about responding to any post and inadvertently re-posting the ENTIRE digest to the list! More information on RootsWeb's Boards can be found at: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=faq&r=rw <http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=faq&r=rw>;; and the Board "home page" is at: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=main&r=rw <http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=main&r=rw>;; If you have any questions about the Boards or what the following is, pls contact me off-list at: SUFFOLK-admin@rootsweb.com <mailto: SUFFOLK-admin@rootsweb.com> Thanks, Peter SUFFOLK List Admin. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: glemsue Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.2.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I don't wish to put a damper on things but as you know its always said never believe all you read in the papers. You don't know how much of those stories are fiction. As you already know he WASN'T married in Stanton church, so theres one bit of untruth. -------------------------------------------------- Fulcher Marriage 1796 Hinderclay This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: gnajgrant Surnames: Classification: lookup Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581/mb.ashx Message Board Post: My ggg Grandfather John Fulcher married Sarah ......? in Hinderclay Suffolk in abt 1796 can any one lookup (a) Sarahs' maiden name and (b) the exact date andplace of the marriage. -------------------------------------------------- Re: Fulcher Marriage 1796 Hinderclay This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: jonwarrn Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi Can't see anything in Suffolk on the internet, there is a marriage in Norfolk, 13 May 1799 St John the Baptist, Garboldisham John Fulcher and Sarah Wharby Some further details are given - marital status, witnesses There are then five baptisms in Garboldisham, 1799 -1810 to this couple. They often gave the mother's maiden name in Norfolk registers, she is confirmed as "late Sarah Wharby, spinster" This could possibly be them, Garboldisham is very close to Hinderclay. As well as transcriptions online, you can also see the actual images of the Garboldisham registers on the Familysearch site. There's another marriage in Cockley Cley, Norfolk, 22 December 1799 - John Fulcher and Sarah Sexton, but this further away. Kind regards John -------------------------------------------------- Re: Samuel Catchpole This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: Gobbitt Surnames: Catchpole, Fairweather, Smith Classification: birth Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8580.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi Margaret Transcripts of Framlingham's parish registers have been published on CD by the Suffolk Family History Society (http://www.suffolkfhs.co.uk/osc/product_info.php?products_id=81&osCsid=cca24ea2d7d4b5708cc5fff9b96cb5f1). They include the baptism of Samuel, son of John and Mary Catchpole, on 6 Feb. 1763. (Not 1761, as given in reply to an Aldringham look-up request on this board in 2006; Samuel's brother John was baptized on 29 March 1761.) If Samuel was a widower when he married Ann Smith at Aldringham in 1790, his first wife may have been Sarah Fairweather (m. Brandeston 3 Nov. 1783). David -------------------------------------------------- Re: Samuel Catchpole This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: maetwaroo Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8580.2.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Dear David, I have just opened my e.mail and found your message. Thank you so much. E -------------------------------------------------- Re Sarah Wharby This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: gnajgrant Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Thanks for your quick responce. The children of the marriage I have in my tree are:- Mary Fulcher B 1805, Lucy Fulcher b 1808 and my ggg Grandfather John b 1811 are they on the list of Baptisms I think they were all born in Garboldisham. If this is correct could please tell me the names and dates of birth of the other two siblings. Cheers Gavin -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.2.1.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Yes Mark, Old George I believe was deacon of the Methodist Church in West Carthage, NY. I will see what English history has about Methodist churches. I did look that up not long ago and should back to it. Thanks for the help. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.2.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Yes, so true we can't believe all things in the papers, yet unfortunately we do rely quite a bit on them for historical information. I appreciate your input. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I forgot all about those search pages you gave link for!! Thanks! -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Bruce thanks for these articles. Did you get them on line? I thought I had these ones? Send me the URL please. Thanks cuz -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I concur her name was Ann Hunter, yet, Bruce, I have nothing further to confirm it is her birth name. Have you found anything about her parents, siblings, so on? -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.2.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Nothing about Ann Hunter yet. I did find some Hunters in the Jefferson County around her timeline. But do not know how they are related. The only thing that makes me believe her name was Ann and not Mary was her cemetery stone. Though I have found during that era nick names were popular and used on public documents. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: These articles were from the Olley history book Marge and Kaye did. When I get time they will be posted in the family tree. What I would like to do is convert the images to text if possible. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.3/mb.ashx Message Board Post: The problem I am having is there is more than one George at that time period in England. I once thought I had the correct George until I noticed that he was still in England after our George was naturalized in the US. I believe that George had a wife named Mary, which I am thinking is where the confusion is. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.3.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Here are a couple of web sites that have news articles in New York State area. These I found in a thread that I replied to for the Hunter family. Be warned, that I tried these and for some reason crashes firefox. http://www.fultonhistory.com/ http://news.nnyln.net/ -------------------------------------------------- Re: oslers This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: safido Surnames: DUNNETT, OSLER Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8578.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I'm confused. If Hannah's father was John Thomas DUNNETT,as you say, then how could her maiden name, that is, her surname before she married, be OSLER? I think I have found the answer - John Thomas DUNNETT was Hannah's husband, not her father. According to the FreeBMD site, www.freebmd.org.uk they were married in the December quarter of 1858, in the Downham registration district. The birth of a Hannah Elizabeth DUNNETT was registered in the September quarter of 1839, in the Downham registration district. The Downham registration district includes the village of Southery, so I think Hannah's birth place was Southery, Norfolkn not "hackford norfolk,southery"? "There are two villages in Norfolk called Hackford and Southery, but they are over 27 miles apart.) I hope that helps. Safido -------------------------------------------------- Re: oslers This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: safido Surnames: DUNNETT, OSLER Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8578.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I'm confused. If Hannah's father was John Thomas DUNNETT,as you say, then how could her maiden name, that is, her surname before she married, be OSLER? I think I have found the answer - John Thomas DUNNETT was Hannah's husband, not her father. According to the FreeBMD site, www.freebmd.org.uk they were married in the December quarter of 1858, in the Downham registration district. The birth of a Hannah Elizabeth DUNNETT was registered in the September quarter of 1839, in the Downham registration district. The Downham registration district includes the village of Southery, so I think Hannah's birth place was Southery, Norfolkn not "hackford norfolk,southery"? "There are two villages in Norfolk called Hackford and Southery, but they are over 27 miles apart.) I hope that helps. Safido -------------------------------------------------- Re: oslers This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: bmccartie Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8578.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: im sorry i had put it down wrong.....john thomas 1838 and died 1895 southery hannah elizabeth osler born 1839 southery and lived 1881 census in feltwell anchor norfolk,they had a child mary and she died from one census to the next my grandmother then was called after her marie louise dunnett. thankyou for correcting me brenda xxx -------------------------------------------------- Re: Re Sarah Wharby This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: jonwarrn Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi Baptisms are William 22 September 1799 George Ezekiel 31 January 1802 Mary 15 June 1804 Lucy 29 June 1807 John 17 December 1810 Full free transcriptions on Freereg http://www.freereg.org.uk/ You can access images of the Garboldisham parish registers on Record Search, part of the LDS Familysearch website http://pilot.familysearch.org/recordsearch/start.html#start or google Familysearch and click on the "Record Search pilot" link, or from the Home page under the "Search Records" menu. Click on Browse Collections and then on the Europe part of world map. In the Europe section, under United Kingdom they have England, Norfolk Parish Registers, 1538-1900 (images) You can see the actual marriage, baptisms etc. Regards John -------------------------------------------------- Fulchers' Of Garboldisham This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: gnajgrant Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi John, Great work, so it is the right family, many thanks. I will now be able to go into the LDS record search and trace the family tree back even further. The street Sarah was living in in the 1861 census was Lower St. not Further St. Cheers Gavin --------------------------------------------------