RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [SFK-UK] Postings
    2. that's the Suffolk surname list as far as the Parish Register look up list that I am aware of is http://www.onlineparishclerks.org.uk/ [1] BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; } and I stumbled across this one, as well, it has other lookups for Suffolk; http://www.genealogy-links.co.uk/html/sfk.lookup.html [2] and don't forget FreeReg at Rootsweb.com On Sun 01/02/11 3:00 PM , Stella Young stellamy@mac.com sent: Hear hear to this, John! I have very few requests these days for look- ups from the parish registers I hold - I suspect that the many transcripts that exist are part of the reason... http://www.terryaspinall.com/suffolk-surname-list/index.html [3] is the current address for this, I believe :) On 2 Jan 2011, at 11:36, John McLinden wrote: > Following this thread, I would point out that while many registers > have now been transcribed by various organisations (usually for > profit) the errors, typos etc., call them what you will, can be > horrendous. > > The Parish Register fiche held by the Look-up Group contain the > actual data - and we do it for free! > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com [4] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Links: ------ [1] http://www.onlineparishclerks.org.uk/ [2] http://www.genealogy-links.co.uk/html/sfk.lookup.html [3] http://www.terryaspinall.com/suffolk-surname-list/index.html [4] mailto:SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com

    01/02/2011 03:46:41
    1. Re: [SFK-UK] Postings
    2. Patricia Bridges
    3. Online Parish Clerks are a totally separate organisation and only some counties are taking part. UK Parish Look Up Exchange is made up of volunteers in various counties around the UK. The Suffolk Surnames List is the home of the Suffolk Parish Look Ups Exchange. We also have Local History Recorders in Suffolk (where the scheme originated) but they cover Local History, not family history. Pat ... Suffolk Surnames List and www.slhc.org.uk :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: <fenenga@connpoint.net> To: <suffolk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 6:46 PM Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] Postings that's the Suffolk surname list > > as far as the Parish Register look up list that I am aware of is > > http://www.onlineparishclerks.org.uk/ [1] > > BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; } > and I stumbled across this one, as well, it has other lookups for > Suffolk; > > http://www.genealogy-links.co.uk/html/sfk.lookup.html [2] > > and don't forget FreeReg at Rootsweb.com > On Sun 01/02/11 3:00 PM , Stella Young stellamy@mac.com sent: > Hear hear to this, John! I have very few requests these days for > look- > ups from the parish registers I hold - I suspect that the many > transcripts that exist are part of the reason... > http://www.terryaspinall.com/suffolk-surname-list/index.html [3] > is the current address for this, I believe :) > On 2 Jan 2011, at 11:36, John McLinden wrote: > > Following this thread, I would point out that while many registers > > > have now been transcribed by various organisations (usually for > > profit) the errors, typos etc., call them what you will, can be > > horrendous. > > > > The Parish Register fiche held by the Look-up Group contain the > > actual data - and we do it for free! > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com [4] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://www.onlineparishclerks.org.uk/ > [2] http://www.genealogy-links.co.uk/html/sfk.lookup.html > [3] http://www.terryaspinall.com/suffolk-surname-list/index.html > [4] mailto:SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    01/02/2011 11:53:11