Thomas Pretty appears in the hearth taxes of 1673 & 1674 in Eye. He appears to have been poor as he was certified. There was at least one other Thomas Pretty around at that time in Eye. At the same location and date was a John Pretty. There were other Prettys around at that time. If you want more details about Pretty in the various hearth taxes between 1662 and 1674, come back to me off list. Wishing you every success in your researches Giles Colchester, Researching COLCHESTER family, any spelling, any time, any place And PACKARD in Suffolk Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:18:04 +1000 From: Sylvia Tupper <sylviatupper@optusnet.com.au> Subject: [SFK-UK] Eye and Wingfield church records To: SUFFOLK@rootsweb.com Is there anyone with access to fiche of the original registers of either the Eye or Wingfield Parish records who wouldn't mind doing a look-up for me? I have a marriage of a Margaret Pretty to John Davy in Eye in 1705 and another of a Margaret Pretty to Francis Godfrey in Wingfield in 1696. In both cases I have seen transcripts of the parish records which do not record where the bride and groom were from, or their marital status. I am hoping that the original registers would have contained this information. The Margaret Pretty in question was born in 1676 in Eye to Thomas and Mary Pretty. Thanks, Sylvia Tupper

Hello Ken Thanks for your reply. I hadn't come across him before but have checked this Ipswich Charles on the 1881 census and the 1851 and he would seem to be a different family to the one I'm looking for. I can trace Eliza through her subsequent two marriages but have completely lost Charles after the 1851 census and the 1856 baptism. One more possibility eliminated - we must be narrowing the search! Thanks again Enid ----- Original Message ----- From: "k.finch" <k.finch@ntlworld.com> To: <suffolk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 7:14 PM Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] Looking for Charles RUDD > Could they have moved to Ipswich there is one of about the right age in > 1882. Rudd children are buried in Somerleyton in the 1850's and 60s but of > course they may not be their children > The Ipswich one was catholic by the way > Ken > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Enid Rispin" <enid.rispin@ntlworld.com> > To: <suffolk@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 6:58 PM > Subject: [SFK-UK] Looking for Charles RUDD > > >>I am looking for a death or burial for Charles RUDD, born Somerleyton 1824 >>and married in Burgh Castle in 1845 to Eliza BURRAGE. >> Charles and Eliza are on the 1851 census for Somerleyton. The youngest >> child I have found was baptised March 1856 and buried February 1858. >> Eliza marries, as a widow, in December 1858. >> I am presuming a death (or disappearance) for Charles sometime around >> 1855 - 1858. >> >> His is not the death Q4, 1855 registered Mutford or Q1, 1856 registered >> Sudbury, Suffolk. Both of these are apparently unrelated children. >> >> Can anyone help? I am new to Rootsweb and very optimistic! >> >> Thanks >> >> Enid >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Alec Searching the 1911 census index (free) finds two Irene LANGMAIDs but only one of which is a Irenen Burwood LANGMAID Searching the same index with her name as the other member of the household finds LANGMAID IRENE BURWOOD F 1902 9 Woodbridge Suffolk LANGMAID CECIL THOMAS M 1887 24 Woodbridge Suffolk LANGMAID CHARLES WILLIAM M 1900 11 Woodbridge Suffolk LANGMAID FREDERICK CHARLES M 1898 13 Woodbridge Suffolk LANGMAID GLADYS ANNIE F 1897 14 Woodbridge Suffolk LANGMAID JANE F 1864 47 Woodbridge Suffolk LANGMAID JANE JESSIE F 1890 21 Woodbridge Suffolk LANGMAID THOMAS WILLIAM M 1850 61 Woodbridge Suffolk You would need the image to get the complete picture with relationships The searching the 1901 census finds Name: Thomas W Langmaid Age: 51 Estimated birth year: abt 1850 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Jane Gender: Male Where born: Bawdsey, Suffolk, England Civil parish: Bawdsey Ecclesiastical parish: Bawdsey St Mary County/Island: Suffolk Country: England Registration district: Woodbridge Sub-registration district: Woodbridge and Wilford ED, institution, or vessel: 2 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 107 Household Members: Name Age Thomas W Langmaid 51 Jane Langmaid 38 Cecil T Langmaid 14 James P Langmaid 12 Jane J Langmaid 11 Dora K Langmaid 8 Jessie L Langmaid 7 Gladys A Langmaid 4 Frederick C Langmaid 3 Claude W Langmaid 1 RG13; Piece: 1785; Folio: 23; Page: 14. Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Please can anyone tell me the parents of IRENE BURWOOD LANGMAID, born > December 1901 at Bawdsey, Woodbridge, Suffolk > > Regards > > Alec Burwood

Please can anyone tell me the parents of IRENE BURWOOD LANGMAID, born December 1901 at Bawdsey, Woodbridge, Suffolk Regards Alec Burwood

Hi list, the Yesterdays site has been updated with thousands more names of persons who appear on offical documents. These documents cover several centuries and diverse documents, from Settlement Examinations to Rogues and Vagabonds, from Bastardy to Removal. Suffolk folk appear within the lists. If link fails Google Yesterdays Journey mike -- http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~spire/Yesterday/index.htm

Is there anyone with access to fiche of the original registers of either the Eye or Wingfield Parish records who wouldn't mind doing a look-up for me? I have a marriage of a Margaret Pretty to John Davy in Eye in 1705 and another of a Margaret Pretty to Francis Godfrey in Wingfield in 1696. In both cases I have seen transcripts of the parish records which do not record where the bride and groom were from, or their marital status. I am hoping that the original registers would have contained this information. The Margaret Pretty in question was born in 1676 in Eye to Thomas and Mary Pretty. Thanks, Sylvia Tupper

Firstly a very big thank you for the help received so far. I know considerably more about Saxtead and records available now. I haven't yet been able to look at the parish records and it takes a couple of weeks to order up microfilm etc through the LDS out here. (140 km round trip just to place the order) Secondly however I'm too impatient to just wait for those. A Google search tells me that William Punyer 1327 appears in the Pinchbeck Register. This old volume is among other things a record of the assets of the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds in Suffolk. This doesn't appear to be any easier to get hold of than LDS microfilm in this neck of the woods so does some SKS have any information on this record. The name Punyer hasn't appeared in any other searches of Suffolk Parishes etc but the name Punchard does and from my experience in Kent, Punchard would seem to be the sort of name Punyer might "evolve" into. Does anyone have any links with PUNCHARD particularly in the Saxtead area 16th/17th century. TIA Ted Fowler Drake in Northern New South Wales

Trying to find the family of Mary BORLEY who married Jarvis COE at Bury Saint Edmunds on May 19 1777. Register shows: Jarvis Coe & Mary Borley both single of this parish. Witnesses William Baxter, John Mann. Anyone know of this Mary?

According to the House of Commons Child Migrants Trust Report 1999, it is estimated that approximately 150,000 children were dispatched to the colonies over a period of 350 years with the earliest recorded child migrants leaving Britain in 1618 for Virginia USA. Over 100,000 of these youngsters ended up in Canada. While researching my own family history, I accidentally discovered that one of my distantly related ancestors Elizabeth Griffin was a Child Migrant. My family had been completely unaware of her existence even though my great great grandparents raised her brother Dennis from the age of 9. She was sent overseas in 1901 by a Northern Workhouse to Canada along with a group of other local children. As some of these children came from Suffolk there is a possibility that there may be one in your family tree. There still may be descendants of these children’s families living in the United Kingdom and further afield With a little bit of determined research and plenty of patience, some of you may also discover that you have connections to families around the world. I am saddened to see that there are still very many known ‘home children’ who are not being ‘claimed’. Of course their descendents are often unaware of their existence as I was but for those of your readers researching their family history, who have found that the trail of a young ancestor has ‘gone cold’ between the years of public census, it may be that they had not simply died but that they were one of these many children. A child did not have to have been an orphan or deserted for them to have been sent overseas. There have been times in the past when social conditions in Britain were tough and families found themselves in difficulties for all sorts of reasons. Some had to turn to one of the many organizations such as Barnardos for help. Sometimes it was part of the agreement of a child’s admission to a home that their parents/guardians had to consent to their children being ‘emigrated’ if the organization thought fit. It is also worth knowing that a few did manage to return home again so that they do not appear to have left in the first place. Some young men enlisted in the Army during WW1 and WW2 as a way of trying to return home, others simply waited until they reached adulthood and were able to save up for the passage home. Many however were completely unaware of their origins or had lost touch with their families. Some simply never had the opportunity to return to the UK because of poverty, illness or death. Despite the very many sad stories that have come to light over the years there have also been many successes and some children were fortunate to be taken on by considerate employers or found themselves in loving homes and went on to have families of their own. However their lives turned out to be, happy or sad, they all deserve to be remembered and yet this still seems to be a period in our history that has been shamefully neglected and forgotten. My personal aim is to try to unite descendants with their ‘home child’. To this end, if any of you think that there is a possibility that you might be connected to one of these child migrants, I would like to recommend as a starting point a couple of very good websites devoted to this very topic: http://www.britishhomechildren.org http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/d...5-100.01-e.php We are trying to build a comprehensive index on www.britishhomechildren.org of all children sent overseas so even if you do not have a child migrant in your family please help raise awareness of the scheme by visiting the sites and reading about the scheme If you have any questions about the schemes please feel free to contact me and I will endeaviour to answer if I can or find out the answer. Thank you so much for reading this Georgina Sales Proud to be connected to Elizabeth (Marjorie) Griffin, one of over 100,000 British Home Children sent from the United Kingdom to a new life in Canada. Proud to be connected to Elizabeth (Marjorie) Griffin, one of over 100,000 British Home Children sent from the United Kingdom to a new life in Canada.

Sylvia, Probably not much use as it is later than your enquiry but Mary Margaret Pretty m. John Sallett (Sillett) 1 May 1738. She was buried 21 June 1766, he was baptised 21 May 1707 and buried 30 May 1766 - all events at Eye. Brian Sillett ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sylvia Tupper" <sylviatupper@optusnet.com.au> To: <SUFFOLK@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:18 AM Subject: [SFK-UK] Eye and Wingfield church records > Is there anyone with access to fiche of the original registers of > either the Eye or Wingfield Parish records who wouldn't mind doing a > look-up for me? > I have a marriage of a Margaret Pretty to John Davy in Eye in 1705 and > another of a Margaret Pretty to Francis Godfrey in Wingfield in 1696. > In both cases I have seen transcripts of the parish records which do > not record where the bride and groom were from, or their marital status. > > I am hoping that the original registers would have contained this > information. The Margaret Pretty in question was born in 1676 in Eye > to Thomas and Mary Pretty. > > Thanks, > > Sylvia Tupper > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2979 - Release Date: 07/03/10 07:35:00

WINGFIELD   transcrpits by Rev Aldwell MARRIAGES 1696 Francis GODFREY and Margaret PRETTY Oct 11. Honor Please don't judge me on what I have achieved, but what I have overcome. Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive well preserved body. Rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!" --- On Sun, 4/7/10, Brian Sillett <brian.sillett010@btinternet.com> wrote: From: Brian Sillett <brian.sillett010@btinternet.com> Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] Eye and Wingfield church records To: suffolk@rootsweb.com Date: Sunday, 4 July, 2010, 12:58 Sylvia, Probably not much use as it is later than your enquiry but Mary Margaret Pretty m. John Sallett (Sillett) 1 May 1738. She was buried 21 June 1766, he was baptised 21 May 1707 and buried 30 May 1766 - all events at Eye. Brian Sillett ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sylvia Tupper" <sylviatupper@optusnet.com.au> To: <SUFFOLK@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 11:18 AM Subject: [SFK-UK] Eye and Wingfield church records > Is there anyone with access to fiche of the original registers of > either the Eye or Wingfield Parish records who wouldn't mind doing a > look-up for me? > I have a marriage of a Margaret Pretty to John Davy in Eye in 1705 and > another of a Margaret Pretty to Francis Godfrey in Wingfield in 1696. > In both cases I have seen transcripts of the parish records which do > not record where the bride and groom were from, or their marital status. > > I am hoping that the original registers would have contained this > information. The Margaret Pretty in question was born in 1676 in Eye > to Thomas and Mary Pretty. > > Thanks, > > Sylvia Tupper > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2979 - Release Date: 07/03/10 07:35:00 ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi I had a reply with details on Isaacson but somehow I lost the e-mail this I think was off group as I have had a look on the web & can't see it I am still trying to learn this Outlook program & learn the computer this is how I lost it I think it is somewhere just can't find it so if the person who sent me details of census & family details could send it again I really would appreciate it Regards Janice

Hello Ted, I have a feeling that SUFFOLK INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY http://www.suffolkarch.org.uk/ has the Pinchbeck Register in its library, which you will find at the Bury St Edmunds branch of the Suffolk Record Office. You could send an enquiry directly to Katie at the Bury on katie.vaughan@libher.suffolkcc.gov.uk It is unlikely that such an ancient volume will be available on the internet. Such precious items have to be ordered up from the store room and white gloves worn to protect the pages whilst the book sits on a book-rest (SLHC will be donating more in memory of the late Suffolk historian Peter Northeast). Impatient eh? I have been researching for thirty nine years since becoming engaged to my Framlingham born husband, you do learn to be patient, eventually :-) Pat ... in a very sunny south Suffolk From: "Ted & Magi" tedandmagi@bordernet.com.au > Firstly a very big thank you for the help received so far. I know > considerably more about Saxtead and records available now. I haven't yet > been able to look at the parish records and it takes a couple of weeks to > order up microfilm etc through the LDS out here. (140 km round trip just > to place the order) > Secondly however I'm too impatient to just wait for those. A Google > search tells me that William Punyer 1327 appears in the Pinchbeck > Register. This old volume is among other things a record of the assets of > the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds in Suffolk. This doesn't appear to be any > easier to get hold of than LDS microfilm in this neck of the woods so > does some SKS have any information on this record. > The name Punyer hasn't appeared in any other searches of Suffolk Parishes > etc but the name Punchard does and from my experience in Kent, Punchard > would seem to be the sort of name Punyer might "evolve" into. Does anyone > have any links with PUNCHARD particularly in the Saxtead area 16th/17th > century. > TIA > Ted Fowler > Drake in Northern New South Wales

My interest is the PUNYER surname until today I knew it as a very localised Kentish name but I have just had the 1571 will of John Punyer transcribed. He was a yeoman of Saxtead Suffolk. this is the first time my interest has brought me to Suffolk and I hope SKS will be able to answer my queries. He requests in his will that he be buried in the church yard of Saxtead, does the church and yard still exist? Google map of Saxtead doesn't show a lot! Does Suffolk FHS publish any parish records for the area. I can't find an IGI transcription of Saxstead parish records. The will mentions his wife Alice and a number of nephews and nieces all with the surname Punyer which makes me think there must have been brothers as well as a married sister with the surname Pechy. A few more names appear, Fryet(t), Rumsye, Grymble, Penninge and Kent. There is also a reference to "Crosse Pyghtle" Pyghtle is an ancient Anglo-Saxon word meaning "small parcel of land, a small enclosure, a croft". Still in use in East Anglia however I haven't been able to find "Crosse pyghtle" If anyone has an interest in any of the above please contact me and I'd be delighted to share any information I have. Ted Fowler Drake, a village in northern New South Wales Australia.

Hello Ted, I am surprised that you were not able to find very much for Saxstead as it has one of the most famous windmills in the county, a wonderful site to see the sails turning on a windy day. Indeed as we drove through Saxstead on Thursday, All Saints church and its surrounding churchyard was still there :-) Have a look for yourself on Simon's web site http://www.suffolkchurches.co.uk/saxtead.html The parish records for All Saints are from 1546-1900 on a total of just 12 fiche, so not a huge parish. They have been filmed and are available on fiche, you could probably order them to your local LDS centre. Saxtead has three main areas, Saxtead Green, where the windmill is to be found. Saxtead Bottom where the church is situated and Saxstead Little Green. It is mostly a farming area, with lots of 'hewge' fields of wheat. (Suffolk is known as the bread basket of England as Kent is the Garden of England). Today All Saints church shares an incumbent with its neighbouring parish of Framlingham St Michael, the nearby market town. The Local History Recorder for many years was an amazing woman who wrote books on the area, but also wrote of her travels overland to places like Jerusalem - in a converted 'Green Goddess' (Fire Engine made for the ATS in the 1950s). Sadly she passed away in the last couple of years. However, much of her research has been passed to the new LHR and I will send the details off list directly to you. Pat ... Patricia Bridges ~ Hon Recorders' Secretary Suffolk Local History Council http://www.slhc.org.uk/ From: "Ted & Magi" <tedandmagi@bordernet.com.au> > My interest is the PUNYER surname until today I knew it as a very > localised Kentish name but I have just had the 1571 will of John Punyer > transcribed. He was a yeoman of Saxtead Suffolk. this is the first time > my interest has brought me to Suffolk and I hope SKS will be able to > answer my queries. > > He requests in his will that he be buried in the church yard of Saxtead, > does the church and yard still exist? Google map of Saxtead doesn't show > a lot! > Does Suffolk FHS publish any parish records for the area. > I can't find an IGI transcription of Saxstead parish records. > The will mentions his wife Alice and a number of nephews and nieces all > with the surname Punyer which makes me think there must have been > brothers as well as a married sister with the surname Pechy. > A few more names appear, Fryet(t), Rumsye, Grymble, Penninge and Kent. > There is also a reference to "Crosse Pyghtle" Pyghtle is an ancient > Anglo-Saxon word meaning "small parcel of land, a small enclosure, a > croft". Still in use in East Anglia however I haven't been able to find > "Crosse pyghtle" > > If anyone has an interest in any of the above please contact me and I'd > be delighted to share any information I have. > > Ted Fowler > Drake, a village in northern New South Wales Australia. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Could they have moved to Ipswich there is one of about the right age in 1882. Rudd children are buried in Somerleyton in the 1850's and 60s but of course they may not be their children The Ipswich one was catholic by the way Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Enid Rispin" <enid.rispin@ntlworld.com> To: <suffolk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 6:58 PM Subject: [SFK-UK] Looking for Charles RUDD >I am looking for a death or burial for Charles RUDD, born Somerleyton 1824 >and married in Burgh Castle in 1845 to Eliza BURRAGE. > Charles and Eliza are on the 1851 census for Somerleyton. The youngest > child I have found was baptised March 1856 and buried February 1858. > Eliza marries, as a widow, in December 1858. > I am presuming a death (or disappearance) for Charles sometime around > 1855 - 1858. > > His is not the death Q4, 1855 registered Mutford or Q1, 1856 registered > Sudbury, Suffolk. Both of these are apparently unrelated children. > > Can anyone help? I am new to Rootsweb and very optimistic! > > Thanks > > Enid > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I am looking for a death or burial for Charles RUDD, born Somerleyton 1824 and married in Burgh Castle in 1845 to Eliza BURRAGE. Charles and Eliza are on the 1851 census for Somerleyton. The youngest child I have found was baptised March 1856 and buried February 1858. Eliza marries, as a widow, in December 1858. I am presuming a death (or disappearance) for Charles sometime around 1855 - 1858. His is not the death Q4, 1855 registered Mutford or Q1, 1856 registered Sudbury, Suffolk. Both of these are apparently unrelated children. Can anyone help? I am new to Rootsweb and very optimistic! Thanks Enid

Folks, Every week or so (or whenever the digest gets to about 20 KB), I'm forwarding to the List those posts that have been "gatewayed" from RootsWeb's SUFFOLK Board that might contain information of interest to List subscribers, and here's the current "digest" of such gatewayed posts. If you wish to respond to any of these gatewayed posts, please do so by clicking on the relevant "Message Board URL:" link and NOT by responding either to the list OR to my address as the digest poster. Board posters will not see your List response unless they are also subscribed to the List, and most are not. PLEASE also be careful about responding to any post and inadvertently re-posting the ENTIRE digest to the list! More information on RootsWeb's Boards can be found at: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=faq&r=rw <http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=faq&r=rw>;; and the Board "home page" is at: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=main&r=rw <http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec?htx=main&r=rw>;; If you have any questions about the Boards or what the following is, pls contact me off-list at: SUFFOLK-admin@rootsweb.com <mailto: SUFFOLK-admin@rootsweb.com> Thanks, Peter SUFFOLK List Admin. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: glemsue Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.2.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I don't wish to put a damper on things but as you know its always said never believe all you read in the papers. You don't know how much of those stories are fiction. As you already know he WASN'T married in Stanton church, so theres one bit of untruth. -------------------------------------------------- Fulcher Marriage 1796 Hinderclay This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: gnajgrant Surnames: Classification: lookup Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581/mb.ashx Message Board Post: My ggg Grandfather John Fulcher married Sarah ......? in Hinderclay Suffolk in abt 1796 can any one lookup (a) Sarahs' maiden name and (b) the exact date andplace of the marriage. -------------------------------------------------- Re: Fulcher Marriage 1796 Hinderclay This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: jonwarrn Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi Can't see anything in Suffolk on the internet, there is a marriage in Norfolk, 13 May 1799 St John the Baptist, Garboldisham John Fulcher and Sarah Wharby Some further details are given - marital status, witnesses There are then five baptisms in Garboldisham, 1799 -1810 to this couple. They often gave the mother's maiden name in Norfolk registers, she is confirmed as "late Sarah Wharby, spinster" This could possibly be them, Garboldisham is very close to Hinderclay. As well as transcriptions online, you can also see the actual images of the Garboldisham registers on the Familysearch site. There's another marriage in Cockley Cley, Norfolk, 22 December 1799 - John Fulcher and Sarah Sexton, but this further away. Kind regards John -------------------------------------------------- Re: Samuel Catchpole This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: Gobbitt Surnames: Catchpole, Fairweather, Smith Classification: birth Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8580.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi Margaret Transcripts of Framlingham's parish registers have been published on CD by the Suffolk Family History Society (http://www.suffolkfhs.co.uk/osc/product_info.php?products_id=81&osCsid=cca24ea2d7d4b5708cc5fff9b96cb5f1). They include the baptism of Samuel, son of John and Mary Catchpole, on 6 Feb. 1763. (Not 1761, as given in reply to an Aldringham look-up request on this board in 2006; Samuel's brother John was baptized on 29 March 1761.) If Samuel was a widower when he married Ann Smith at Aldringham in 1790, his first wife may have been Sarah Fairweather (m. Brandeston 3 Nov. 1783). David -------------------------------------------------- Re: Samuel Catchpole This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: maetwaroo Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8580.2.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Dear David, I have just opened my e.mail and found your message. Thank you so much. E -------------------------------------------------- Re Sarah Wharby This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: gnajgrant Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Thanks for your quick responce. The children of the marriage I have in my tree are:- Mary Fulcher B 1805, Lucy Fulcher b 1808 and my ggg Grandfather John b 1811 are they on the list of Baptisms I think they were all born in Garboldisham. If this is correct could please tell me the names and dates of birth of the other two siblings. Cheers Gavin -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.2.1.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Yes Mark, Old George I believe was deacon of the Methodist Church in West Carthage, NY. I will see what English history has about Methodist churches. I did look that up not long ago and should back to it. Thanks for the help. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.2.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Yes, so true we can't believe all things in the papers, yet unfortunately we do rely quite a bit on them for historical information. I appreciate your input. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I forgot all about those search pages you gave link for!! Thanks! -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Bruce thanks for these articles. Did you get them on line? I thought I had these ones? Send me the URL please. Thanks cuz -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: olleycdn Surnames: Olley Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I concur her name was Ann Hunter, yet, Bruce, I have nothing further to confirm it is her birth name. Have you found anything about her parents, siblings, so on? -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.2.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Nothing about Ann Hunter yet. I did find some Hunters in the Jefferson County around her timeline. But do not know how they are related. The only thing that makes me believe her name was Ann and not Mary was her cemetery stone. Though I have found during that era nick names were popular and used on public documents. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: These articles were from the Olley history book Marge and Kaye did. When I get time they will be posted in the family tree. What I would like to do is convert the images to text if possible. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.3/mb.ashx Message Board Post: The problem I am having is there is more than one George at that time period in England. I once thought I had the correct George until I noticed that he was still in England after our George was naturalized in the US. I believe that George had a wife named Mary, which I am thinking is where the confusion is. -------------------------------------------------- Re: George Olley brn:1797 This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: BruceOlley Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8531.3.1.3.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Here are a couple of web sites that have news articles in New York State area. These I found in a thread that I replied to for the Hunter family. Be warned, that I tried these and for some reason crashes firefox. http://www.fultonhistory.com/ http://news.nnyln.net/ -------------------------------------------------- Re: oslers This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: safido Surnames: DUNNETT, OSLER Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8578.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I'm confused. If Hannah's father was John Thomas DUNNETT,as you say, then how could her maiden name, that is, her surname before she married, be OSLER? I think I have found the answer - John Thomas DUNNETT was Hannah's husband, not her father. According to the FreeBMD site, www.freebmd.org.uk they were married in the December quarter of 1858, in the Downham registration district. The birth of a Hannah Elizabeth DUNNETT was registered in the September quarter of 1839, in the Downham registration district. The Downham registration district includes the village of Southery, so I think Hannah's birth place was Southery, Norfolkn not "hackford norfolk,southery"? "There are two villages in Norfolk called Hackford and Southery, but they are over 27 miles apart.) I hope that helps. Safido -------------------------------------------------- Re: oslers This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: safido Surnames: DUNNETT, OSLER Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8578.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I'm confused. If Hannah's father was John Thomas DUNNETT,as you say, then how could her maiden name, that is, her surname before she married, be OSLER? I think I have found the answer - John Thomas DUNNETT was Hannah's husband, not her father. According to the FreeBMD site, www.freebmd.org.uk they were married in the December quarter of 1858, in the Downham registration district. The birth of a Hannah Elizabeth DUNNETT was registered in the September quarter of 1839, in the Downham registration district. The Downham registration district includes the village of Southery, so I think Hannah's birth place was Southery, Norfolkn not "hackford norfolk,southery"? "There are two villages in Norfolk called Hackford and Southery, but they are over 27 miles apart.) I hope that helps. Safido -------------------------------------------------- Re: oslers This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: bmccartie Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8578.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: im sorry i had put it down wrong.....john thomas 1838 and died 1895 southery hannah elizabeth osler born 1839 southery and lived 1881 census in feltwell anchor norfolk,they had a child mary and she died from one census to the next my grandmother then was called after her marie louise dunnett. thankyou for correcting me brenda xxx -------------------------------------------------- Re: Re Sarah Wharby This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: jonwarrn Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi Baptisms are William 22 September 1799 George Ezekiel 31 January 1802 Mary 15 June 1804 Lucy 29 June 1807 John 17 December 1810 Full free transcriptions on Freereg http://www.freereg.org.uk/ You can access images of the Garboldisham parish registers on Record Search, part of the LDS Familysearch website http://pilot.familysearch.org/recordsearch/start.html#start or google Familysearch and click on the "Record Search pilot" link, or from the Home page under the "Search Records" menu. Click on Browse Collections and then on the Europe part of world map. In the Europe section, under United Kingdom they have England, Norfolk Parish Registers, 1538-1900 (images) You can see the actual marriage, baptisms etc. Regards John -------------------------------------------------- Fulchers' Of Garboldisham This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: gnajgrant Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sfk.general/8581.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi John, Great work, so it is the right family, many thanks. I will now be able to go into the LDS record search and trace the family tree back even further. The street Sarah was living in in the 1861 census was Lower St. not Further St. Cheers Gavin --------------------------------------------------

Ted & Magi <tedandmagi@bordernet.com.au> wrote: > My interest is the PUNYER surname until today I knew it as a very > localised Kentish name but I have just had the 1571 will of John Punyer > transcribed. He was a yeoman of Saxtead Suffolk. this is the first time my > interest has brought me to Suffolk and I hope SKS will be able to answer > my queries. > He requests in his will that he be buried in the church yard of Saxtead, > does the church and yard still exist? Google map of Saxtead doesn't show a > lot! To look at the church go to Simon's website for Churches in Suffolk - you will find Saxtead at:- http://www.suffolkchurches.co.uk/saxtead.html >Does Suffolk FHS publish any parish records for the area. If you wish to look at the Church Registers these are available on microfiche from the Suffolk Record Office - you only need to purchase the fiche for the period and event in which you are interested and not all the fiche for the parish - see http://www.suffolk.gov.uk/LeisureAndCulture/LocalHistoryAndHeritage/SuffolkRecordOffice/Services/ParishRegisterCopyingService.htm > I can't find an IGI transcription of Saxstead parish records. According to the Family Search Library catalogue a transcript of the Saxtead Register is available for the period 1546 - 1753. If there is a Family History Centre near to you they should be able to order a copy. Hope this helps Brian PS The Local History Recorder may be able to help you with the location of Cross Pyghtle - If Pat is around she will be able to tell you if there is a LHR for Saxtead.

Thank you, Giles, I hadn't thought of searching in that way. I shall now spend many a happy time looking :-) Joy > From: "Giles Colchester" <gsc@mydsq.freeserve.co.uk> > Subject: [SFK-UK] Suffolk persons on London Lives > There are several persons who were from Suffolk who are recorded on the > new > London Lives website. http://www.londonlives.org/formPersName.jsp The > prime > search facility is by surname, but I was also able on one of their options > to just search for references to Suffolk, and that showed that there are > many references which should be of interest to researchers on this list. > The data is mostly 18th century but there are references to other periods. > Some of the data is a replication of: the PCC wills (on the TNA website), > Old Bailey data (on the old Bailey website), and the London Guildhall > records for insurance records (on the A2A website), but there are some > records, particularly on the London sessions, which are new and which also > have a link to the underlying original document. Altogether a useful > website, and I very much look forward to seeing how people make use of the > wiki that they are hoping to add to it for researchers to record > biographical details of the persons identified in the records. >