If you have a look at Ancestry.com you will see Canadian Passenger Arrivals 1865 - 1935 which may help? Claire On 4/11/2010 11:03 a.m., Brian Evans wrote: > I see that Find My Past has available passenger lists for outward migration from 1890 onwards; can SKS tell me if there are any published lists of sailings to Canada in 1888 or 1889 ... and if so, where? > > TIA, > > Brian in soggy > Letchworth, > the First Garden City > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > /

Hi From Halesworth parish registers Thomas son of Thomas and Sarah Brett was baptized 31 Jan 1797 * suspect he was buried as an infant Thomas son of Thomas and Sarah Brett was baptized 24 Apr 1801 and buried 09 Aug 1801 Thomas son of Thomas and Sarah Brett was baptized 23 Jun 1802 Mother's maiden name was Blandell Hopes this helps Anitra Brian Griffiths wrote: > I wonder if someone with access to Halesworth PRs could have a look for > the christening of a Thomas Brett around 1802? He is the husband of my > GGGG aunt Alitha Algar of North Cove. They married in 1820 at Barnby, at > which time he was decribed as "of Southwold" > > He's a bit of a puzzle. The 1851 census has him in Lakenheath, but the > age appears to be 69, suggesting a birth around 1782, and much older > than his wife. This conflicts with the 1841 census, where he is younger > than his wife, who seems to be mis-named Charlotte in 1851! However her > place of birth and age is correct for Alitha, and 3 of their children > are with them in both 1841 and 1851. I also have a death certificate > (1854) which I think must be him which places his birth firmly in the > 1801-2 timeframe. Alitha outlived him. > > I am also trying to track down his son John, who in 1851 is married to a > Harriet with 3 children (living with Thomas & "Charlotte"/Alitha). After > that he disappears completely until 1871 when he apparently pops up in > Stepney married to an Ellen with (c1826 -?1903?) a different set of > children. We are fairly sure this is the same chap, as his death record > (1903) refers to him as John Algar Brett. > > Any help most gratefully received > > Brian > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

I wonder if someone with access to Halesworth PRs could have a look for the christening of a Thomas Brett around 1802? He is the husband of my GGGG aunt Alitha Algar of North Cove. They married in 1820 at Barnby, at which time he was decribed as "of Southwold" He's a bit of a puzzle. The 1851 census has him in Lakenheath, but the age appears to be 69, suggesting a birth around 1782, and much older than his wife. This conflicts with the 1841 census, where he is younger than his wife, who seems to be mis-named Charlotte in 1851! However her place of birth and age is correct for Alitha, and 3 of their children are with them in both 1841 and 1851. I also have a death certificate (1854) which I think must be him which places his birth firmly in the 1801-2 timeframe. Alitha outlived him. I am also trying to track down his son John, who in 1851 is married to a Harriet with 3 children (living with Thomas & "Charlotte"/Alitha). After that he disappears completely until 1871 when he apparently pops up in Stepney married to an Ellen with (c1826 -?1903?) a different set of children. We are fairly sure this is the same chap, as his death record (1903) refers to him as John Algar Brett. Any help most gratefully received Brian

Hello All, I am looking for any information on how to find more on these families. I have found that William ATKINSON married Martha JERMAIN 1795 Bradfield Combust and had Ann 1797 and John 1804. The later being born in Stanningfield. I found a family tree online and I am checking the information but where would I go to go back further or get any other information. Thanking you for your time Vanessa in New Zealand

Hi Valerie, yes, there was a Cholera epidemic at that time. Neil > Hi, > > Can anybody tell me which epidemic was threatening Suffolk villages in > 1835? > Was it perhaps cholera?? I have whole families dying at the same time! > > Valerie Bill > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi, Can anybody tell me which epidemic was threatening Suffolk villages in 1835? Was it perhaps cholera?? I have whole families dying at the same time! Valerie Bill

Hi Brian   You might want to also look at these sites for more Ships Lists on Canadian Immigration:   http://www.theshipslist.com/index.html   http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/databases/passenger/001045-130-e.html   http://www.immigrantships.net/   http://jubilation.uwaterloo.ca/~marj/genealogy/thevoyage.html   Good luck with your search   Lesley   Researching: CLARKE, AVEY  (Icklingham)

Hi Brian Unlikely in this Country see http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/records/research-guides/passenger-lists.htm You are more likely to find incoming in the Country of migration Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > I see that Find My Past has available passenger lists for outward > migration from 1890 onwards; can SKS tell me if there are any published > lists of sailings to Canada in 1888 or 1889 ... and if so, where? > > > Brian in soggy > Letchworth, > the First Garden City

I see that Find My Past has available passenger lists for outward migration from 1890 onwards; can SKS tell me if there are any published lists of sailings to Canada in 1888 or 1889 ... and if so, where? TIA, Brian in soggy Letchworth, the First Garden City

Bob Stephenson <rstephenson3@cogeco.ca> wrote: > Brian, would the age for the Hannah in the 61 census be consistant with > being born 1838? I do know some sibblings and her father were listed as > being born Willisham. Bob More or less she was age 25. Brian

Bob Stephenson <rstephenson3@cogeco.ca> wrote: > Good morning everyone, in the 10 years i have been researching my > STEPHENSON/STEVENSON line from Suffolk i have never found my > g.g.grandmother in the 1861 census. Could i please ask if someone with > Ancestry would do a search for Hannah Choat/Choatt/Choate/Chuett in > Barking, Suffolk. Hannah was b: 1838 at Barking and i wonder if she was > there just before her marriage April 25, 1861 in Merton, Surrey. Any help > would be appreciated. Bob I take it that you have found Hannah Choat in Chatham in the 1861 census but she gives her place of birth as Gillingham. I see that in the 1851 the Hannah Choat in Barking is listed as being born in Willisham. I just wonder if the enumerator misread his own writing and substituted Willisham with Gillingham which was more local to him. Both places have the double L and end with ham so I suppose it is possible. The enumerators books were usually written up after the census information had been collected. The Hannah Choat of Kent does not appear in the 1851 census which could be further evidence of the theory. Is there anything that would connect your Hannah with Chatham (someone naval in the family?) or Kent. Brian

Looks like we could not find Hannah again. I would like to thank the many people who searched for her but could not find her. Thankyou for taking the time to look for her. Bob

The library in Sudbury has re-opened after refurbishment and the Local Studies Centre is still on the first floor with a fiche reader and a film reader and records pertaining to Sudbury and local villages. On Sunday 7th November there will be an Open Day with Suffolk Family History Society from 12.00 noon until 4pm. All are welcome to come along. Pat ... ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

The library in Sudbury has re-opened after refurbishment and the Local Studies Centre is still on the first floor with a fiche reader and a film reader and records pertaining to Sudbury and local villages. On Sunday 7th November there will be an Open Day with Suffolk Family History Society from 12.00 noon until 4pm. All are welcome to come along. Pat ...

Brian, would the age for the Hannah in the 61 census be consistant with being born 1838? I do know some sibblings and her father were listed as being born Willisham. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Lummis" <lummis@btinternet.com> To: <suffolk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:38 AM Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] 1861 census > Bob Stephenson <rstephenson3@cogeco.ca> wrote: >> Good morning everyone, in the 10 years i have been researching my >> STEPHENSON/STEVENSON line from Suffolk i have never found my >> g.g.grandmother in the 1861 census. Could i please ask if someone with >> Ancestry would do a search for Hannah Choat/Choatt/Choate/Chuett in >> Barking, Suffolk. Hannah was b: 1838 at Barking and i wonder if she was >> there just before her marriage April 25, 1861 in Merton, Surrey. Any help >> would be appreciated. > > > Bob > > I take it that you have found Hannah Choat in Chatham in the 1861 census > but > she gives her place of birth as Gillingham. I see that in the 1851 the > Hannah Choat in Barking is listed as being born in Willisham. I just > wonder > if the enumerator misread his own writing and substituted Willisham with > Gillingham which was more local to him. Both places have the double L and > end with ham so I suppose it is possible. The enumerators books were > usually > written up after the census information had been collected. > > The Hannah Choat of Kent does not appear in the 1851 census which could be > further evidence of the theory. Is there anything that would connect your > Hannah with Chatham (someone naval in the family?) or Kent. > > Brian > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SUFFOLK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3233 - Release Date: 11/02/10 >

Good morning everyone, in the 10 years i have been researching my STEPHENSON/STEVENSON line from Suffolk i have never found my g.g.grandmother in the 1861 census. Could i please ask if someone with Ancestry would do a search for Hannah Choat/Choatt/Choate/Chuett in Barking, Suffolk. Hannah was b: 1838 at Barking and i wonder if she was there just before her marriage April 25, 1861 in Merton, Surrey. Any help would be appreciated. Thankyou Bob

Many thanks for your reply Brian I rushed off the post without thinking to check the LDS catalogue but did more or less suspect it would be the BTs This latest link to Woolpit is my first there but it seems to be a wholesome one This is on my fathers side of HAYLOCK & BROWNING , the HAYLOCKs from West Wratting Cambs and the BROWNINGs from Gt Wilbraham, Ousden and now GARDINER in Woolpit, I also have a new CROSSMAN connection to Stoke Ash So it seems I will be busy On my mothers side I have WELLS , BLOIS , CAUDELL , STIFF from Norton, Bury St Edmunds & Horringer How odd they should start off over 200 years ago not so far from each other and by a circuitous route meet up when my mother and father met in the early 1930's in Ealing Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Nivard Ovington <ovington1@sky.com> wrote: >> I am researching the BROWNING CROSSMAN GARDINER line , my >> g.g.g.grandmother was Dorothy BROWNING christened 21st Sep 1777 at >> Ousden >> Her parents were Thomas BROWNING & Mary nee GARDINER >> I have found the following <snip> >>> From familysearch beta > <snip> > >> Source Film Number 898000 > > Nivard > >>From the Family History Library Catalog this film number relates to >>Bishop's > transcripts for the Archdeaconry of Sudbury, 1560-1853 so I guess that > this > is where Sudbury came from. Woolpit was a part of the the Sudbury > Archdeaconry until 1837. > > Brian > (sending this from Woolpit! )

Brian Lummis <lummis@btinternet.com> wrote: Woolpit was a part of the the Sudbury > Archdeaconry until 1837. Correction The boundaries keep changing and Woolpit is on the edge of East and West Suffolk - I now find that it is still in the Sudbury Archdeaconry - my first point of reference did not have the parish listed! It may well be that it has moved in and out over the years. Brian

Nivard Ovington <ovington1@sky.com> wrote: > I am researching the BROWNING CROSSMAN GARDINER line , my > g.g.g.grandmother was Dorothy BROWNING christened 21st Sep 1777 at Ousden > Her parents were Thomas BROWNING & Mary nee GARDINER > I have found the following <snip> >> From familysearch beta <snip> > Source Film Number 898000 Nivard >From the Family History Library Catalog this film number relates to Bishop's transcripts for the Archdeaconry of Sudbury, 1560-1853 so I guess that this is where Sudbury came from. Woolpit was a part of the the Sudbury Archdeaconry until 1837. Brian (sending this from Woolpit! )

I wonder if anyone can help please I am researching the BROWNING CROSSMAN GARDINER line , my g.g.g.grandmother was Dorothy BROWNING christened 21st Sep 1777 at Ousden Her parents were Thomas BROWNING & Mary nee GARDINER I have found the following which conflict >From the online transcript of the Woolpit PRs http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~pbtyc/Den/Woolpit/Index.html I found C GARDINER Mary Henry & Christian 22 Sep 1749 (C being for Christening) And >From familysearch beta Name Mary Gardener Gender Female Baptism/Christening Date 22 Sep 1749 Baptism/Christening Place Sudbury, Suffolk, England Birth Date Birthplace Death Date Name Note Race Father's Name Denny Gardener Father's Birthplace Father's Age Mother's Name Christian Gardener Mother's Birthplace Mother's Age Indexing Project (Batch) Number I02011-3 System Origin England-EASy Source Film Number 898000 Reference Number I believe her father was actually Denny and the Henry is a misreading of Denny although I have not as yet checked the original PRs However the fsbeta shows Sudbury which is the part I cannot understand, I am inclined to trust the Woolpit transcript more than the fsbeta but can anyone offer an explanation as to the Sudbury part ? BTs to Sudbury perhaps? Any help or advice appreciated Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK)