mia culpa, did not see this was too the list, lol... Cornelia On 26.09.2012 15:14, Edie wrote: > Have you seen this one Michael > Edie > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/SCT-PEEBLES-SHIRE/2002-01/1010069064 [1] > > -- Shared using Google Toolbar > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Links: ------ [1] http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/SCT-PEEBLES-SHIRE/2002-01/1010069064

thank you,Michael, unfortunately, I have forgot my original query, could you refresh my memory? best, Cornelia On 26.09.2012 15:14, Edie wrote: > Have you seen this one Michael > Edie > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/SCT-PEEBLES-SHIRE/2002-01/1010069064 [1] > > -- Shared using Google Toolbar > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Links: ------ [1] http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/SCT-PEEBLES-SHIRE/2002-01/1010069064

I do not have 1911 census access but in 1901 as follows George Stevenson Butcher, working at home aged 50 born Ipswich Carolone Stevenson wife born Bury St Edmunds aged 53 Caroline daughter 24 born Bildeston no occupation Catherine Hewitt Domestic servant. Living at 39 Norwich Road, Ipswich. I have emailed image Marjorie ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:13 AM Subject: [SFK-UK] 1901 and 1911 census > Hello everyone, could i please ask if someone could do a 1901 census > lookup for Annie Ellen STEVENSON b: 1876 Bildestone. She may be living > with her mother Caroline in the census. In the 1911 census Annie would > likely be with her husband William Thomas W ORFORD i believe in Ipswich. > If found could you please send me the image. > > Thank you for the help. > > Bob > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi Nivard I know your reply wasn't aimed at me, but I'm pleased to hear that it will be released. Just a shame about the wait. Michael On 26-Sep-12 9:59 AM, Nivard Ovington wrote: > Hi Mick > > From a freedom of information application in 2008 (which was turned > down) part of the response was as follows :- > > > The ONS has advised the Commissioner of its intention to release the > entirety of the 1921 census returns in 2022, in accordance with the > non-statutory ‘100 year rule’ which was adopted to reflect this > undertaking of confidentiality. The practice of employing the 100 year > rule has been inplace for the census since 1962 (for the 1861 census). > Since 1981 the Registrar General has assured the public that census > information will be held in confidence for 100 years. The ONS has > advised the Commissioner that, in its view, response rates for future > census returns will be adversely affected if itfails to honour this pledge. > > Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > > >> Hello Michael, >> As I understand it the 1921 census will never be released, there is an Act >> of Parliament preventing the release of any of its information. Has anyone >> heard anything to the contrary? >> >> Regards, >> Mick. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi Paula I had thought about middle names and the like. My father was Roy, but everybody called him Steve and he would often sign himself a Steve. Where and why he got the name Steve he never knew, but for the 50 years of working on the railway he was never known as Roy, except on his payslip. If the same has happened here, then I have little or no chance. Michael On 26-Sep-12 10:21 AM, Paula Hadgraft wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I have looked but not found much to help you either, however I did > have one thought. > > What if John was the middle name of her father and that is what he was > known as. I have had a few relatives that have gone by their middle > names and they have been found in the census with that name. > > So for example: George John, Thomas John. > > It is just a thought anyway. > > The other one is perhaps Helen was her middle name too and her first > name was Elizabeth, but she prefered Helen instead. > > I will keep looking and see if I can find anything else. > > Paula

Hi Bob, Censuses sent off list. Paula On 26 September 2012 10:13, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, could i please ask if someone could do a 1901 census lookup for Annie Ellen STEVENSON b: 1876 Bildestone. She may be living with her mother Caroline in the census. In the 1911 census Annie would likely be with her husband William Thomas W ORFORD i believe in Ipswich. If found could you please send me the image. > > Thank you for the help. > > Bob > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Paula; the only email i have is: [email protected] Steve is also a member of our Stephenson/Raynham line. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Paula Hadgraft Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:34 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [SFK-UK] contact for Steve Barber? Hi all, Does anyone have the current email address for Steve Barber? He is a member of the SFHS and was on this list for quite a few years. He is a distant cousin of mine through my Everson family tree and I'd like to get in touch with the new information I have. Thank if anyone can help. Hugs, Paula ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello Jane; I did not know the 1911 census was free for a while. Thank you for letting us know. I must go now as i have a lot of searching to do. Thanks again Bob -----Original Message----- From: Jane Milbourne Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [SFK-UK] 1911 census Someone was asking for a 1911 census lookup. The 1911 census is currently free until 2nd November on ancestry.co.uk Jane ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello Nivard, This was a quote from a government site earlier this year which I kept but don't know when the quote was made. It does though refer to the 1921 Census Act that I believe had to be repelled or what ever they call it, it could not just be superceded by other Acts. . "The ruling by the Information Commissioner that resulted in the 1911 census being opened early does not apply to the 1921 census because, unlike the 1911 census, the 1921 census was conducted under the 1920 Census Act, which is still in force and which contains a statutory prohibition on disclosure." Is this the left or the right hand? Thought I had better change the subject line. Does anyone else have any thoughts on the subject? Regards Mick

Hi Mick From a freedom of information application in 2008 (which was turned down) part of the response was as follows :- The ONS has advised the Commissioner of its intention to release the entirety of the 1921 census returns in 2022, in accordance with the non-statutory ‘100 year rule’ which was adopted to reflect this undertaking of confidentiality. The practice of employing the 100 year rule has been inplace for the census since 1962 (for the 1861 census). Since 1981 the Registrar General has assured the public that census information will be held in confidence for 100 years. The ONS has advised the Commissioner that, in its view, response rates for future census returns will be adversely affected if itfails to honour this pledge. Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) > Hello Michael, > As I understand it the 1921 census will never be released, there is an Act > of Parliament preventing the release of any of its information. Has anyone > heard anything to the contrary? > > Regards, > Mick.

That's an interesting point Roy and Edie. There is a Wilson family that I keep returning to in Blundeston. There are 4 sons and a few daughters. I must admit that I haven't looked at this line for a couple of years, so it may be worth further investigation to see if anything new has turned up. These are the notes that I have made over the years. Somebody may see something I have missed. Notes for Helen Wilson So we have John [1] born 1796 His son John [2] born 1821 And his son John [3] born 1843 What follows is quite complex but there again isn't all family history research. The 1841 census for Blundeston HO107/1029/4 page 4 West End shows a John [1] (born 1796) Mary (born 1801) James 15 = 1826 Charlotte 14 = 1827 Elizabeth 12 = 1829 Jacob 9 = 1832 Charles 5 = 1836 not far away HO107/1029/4 page 10 Mill Street is a John Wilson Jun'r [2] age shown as 15 Maria 20 Elizabeth 6 months I am assuming that John [2] jun'r is the son of John [1] and Mary as there is no other Wilson's in the village and he has referred to himself as Jun'r implying that he is John son of John. Now the 2 daughters Charlotte and Elizabeth were 14 and 12 respectively and it is possible that one of them may have been widowed in the 1860's and then had an illegitimate daughter and trying to find or prove this would be very difficult There have been many leads that I have followed over the years but all have drawn a blank in that they have either died or married somebody else and have been found on the 1901 census with that person. The 1851 census HO 107/1805 415 The Street, Blundeston shows the family as follows. WILSON John [2] 30 Sfk Blundeston = 1821 WILSON Maria 33 Nfk Forncett St Mary = 1818 WILSON Elizabeth 10 Sfk Blundeston = 1841 WILSON John [3] 7 Sfk Blundeston = 1843 WILSON William 6 Sfk Blundeston = 1845 WILSON Frederick 3 Sfk Blundeston = 1848 WILSON James 1 Sfk Blundeston = 1850 In the1861 census RG9/1188 Folio 48 Page 12 High St Blundeston John WILSON [2] Sfk Blundeston = 1821 Maria WILSON Nfk Forncett St Mary = 1818 John WILSON [3] aged 18 a fisherman Sfk Blundeston = 1843 Frederick 14. Sfk Blundeston =1847 James 11. Sfk Blundeston = 1850 Ann Maria 9. Sfk Blundeston = 1852 Charlotte 4. Sfk Blundeston = 1857 Clara 2. Sfk Blundeston = 1859 Eldest daughter Elizabeth is a servant in Yarmouth RG9/1191 folio 168 page 8 Seven years later on July 21st 1868 @ Blundeston John WILSON aged 25 married a widow named Susan WARD formerly BUCK aged 29. Susan, Johns wife was buried November 19th 1870 St Mary, Blundeston aged 32. There appears to have been no children from this marriage, as none appear to be living with John or his parents in Blundeston, or her parents. Susan (BUCK) had married Samuel WARD March qtr 1862 registered @ Yarmouth 4B page 12. There is then the death of a Samuel WARD December qtr 1866 registered @ Mutford 4A page 473? Aged 25 The burial of Samuel is recorded as 22nd May 1866 at St Mary, Blundeston 1871 census RG10/1781 Folio 8 Page 8 John WILSON [2] Sfk Blundeston = 1821 Maria WILSON Nfk Forncett St Mary = 1818 John 28 is a widower he was married less than 2 years 4 months Frederick 24 James 21 George 8 shown as son but possible the son of Elizabeth Clara died in 1861 GRO reference Dec 1861 Mutford 4a 418 Anna Maria and Charlotte are not at home. Ann Maria Wilson was born in 1851and appears with her parents in the 1861 census, In the 1871 she is an unmarried servant in Gorleston, Yarmouth RG10/1789 folio 132 page 10. In the 1881 she is still unmarried and a servant in Gorleston RG11/1908 folio 52 page 24. In 1891 Ann has married Charles TURNER a bricklayer and is living in Lowestoft RG12/1492 folio 15 page 18 they have a daughter Maud aged 1. In 1901 Ann is still living in Lowestoft with Charles. RG13/1803 folio 14 page 19 and have another daughter Ethel born in 1894 There appears to have been no illegitimate children but she could have had a child. Charlotte Wilson was born in 1856 registered at Mutford Dec qtr 1856 Vol 4a page 626 appears with her parents in the 1861 census. She doesn't seem to appear in either the 1871 or 1881 census. In the 1891 census there is a Charlotte WILSON aged 29 (puts birth 1862) born Blundeston as House Keeper in home of Charles BOYCE a widowed fisherman aged 39 in Blundeston RG12/1495 folio 51 page 14. I can find no other Charlotte Wilson born in the Blundeston area around 1862 Also there as a visitor is an Alice WILSON aged 9 born in Blundeston. Is she Charlotte's daughter? Neither Charlotte or Alice appear in the 1901 census at least I can't find them. St Mary, Blundeston shows the burial of Alice age 17 on September 28th 1899 When we get to the 1881 census RG11/1905 Folio 60 Page 16 John has remarried with a daughter Lily May who is aged 2 and son Sidney aged 7 months. he still lives in the High St Blundeston. So John was on his own from November 1870 until February 1877 when he remarried, so did he have a fling or two and possibly have an illegitimate daughter? If so what was her name?. There was an Elizabeth Wilson living not far away in the same street but she was the daughter of Frederick Wilson and Agnes Mary Pye formerly Butterfunt. Frederick was the brother of John. Frederick and Agnes had another daughter named Florence who appears in the 1891 census in the James and Ellen Marjoram household in Lowestoft. Florence is shown as "Sister in Law" Ellen Marjoram used to be Eleanor Elizabeth BUTTERFUNT and she died in 1898, so she wasn't an Ellen Wilson who left James to marry my Gt. Grandfather. In the 1881 census there was a 7 year-old granddaughter named Ada BENSLEY living with John's parents in the Street Blundeston I don't know who her mother was but she was still in Yarmouth in 1901. Further to Elizabeth Mumford I have found that on the 1841 census Elizabeth Wilson was the 6 months old daughter of John and Maria Wilson of Blundeston, In 1851 she was at home aged 10. In 1861 she was a servant in the home of Mary Brikett in Marine Passage, Yarmouth. RG9/1191 folio 168 page 8 In 1871 census Elizabeth MUMFORD appears to be the right age and is apparently listed as the eldest child. I can find no reference to Elizabeth Mumford /Wilson after the 1871 census. There was the marriage of an Elizabeth MUNFORD in the Blofield registration district in Sep 1878 but haven't checked it out Vol 4b page 337 Could it be possible that Elizabeth had an illegitimate daughter? There is a Helen registered birth in the Dec qtr of 1859 at Mutford and I must admit that I haven't followed this up as she would have been 41 when her 1st child wad born and I can't trace her on any of the census. There was one other John who was 13 in the 1871 census and lived in Carlton Colville but I feel that he is too young to have been the father but it is possible if Helen was born six or seven years later This then leaves a couple of possibilities Helen was illegitimate, John was the father but her mother said he was dead. Possible The 1st Susan was the mother, but if she was why didn't John or her parents look after it? Unlikely John wasn't her father and I have the wrong family. Most Probable Another theory is that Helen was perhaps the result of an affair between a fisherman and a Scottish fisher girl who worked the herring fleets along the east coast at that time. I've been unable to find any other John WILSON in the area but the whole roll could be reversed in that John was the fisherman from Scotland and the mother from Norfolk/Suffolk Michael

Roy, Sorry, I forgot to add that during the 1920 and early 30, Helen took my father Roy born 1918, to Kessingland on holiday every year. As yet I can find no connection between Kessingland and the family. I could really do with the 1921 census. Roll on 2022, that's if they release it. Michael On 23-Sep-12 8:11 PM, [email protected] wrote: > From: [email protected]

Hello Roy Many thanks for your email and interest. I have thought for a long time that she was illegitimate, because I have never been able to find anything on her prior to the wedding. Everything surrounding her and that period in time, from her possible year of birth 1872 until 1911. Whilst in Scotland some years ago, my daughter, on seeing a sign post to Peebles, chirped up with "That's where come from, isn't it"? That's what got me into FH. She told me that my father had told her we were from Peebles. But she had only been 10 or 12 when my dad told her, and he was no longer with us. Yes the Peebles link is a good possibility, having been taken there shortly after Helen died. And I do recall my parents going through church records. I also have a vague recollection (I was only 8) that they couldn't find what they were looking for because they had been destroyed by fire. My daughter now lives in Dunfermline, so I have been to Peebles many times, without finding anything even flimsy, let alone concrete. Two things are tending to steer me away from Peebles is that I also recall coming home with a Lamont tartan tie. If you look into the Tartans and there connections, you will find the TURNER family. And my mum was a TURNER. Also, early last year I found that Helen's husband's, half sister married Henry PEEBLES who was born in East Dereham, Norfolk in 1858. His father was born in Neatishead, Norfolk. The line goes back to Kirkliston, West Lothian, Scotland. Got that line back to the mid 1700's and trying to come forward and see if there is a connection there. Could possibly be a Red Herring. The other side of things is that the line keeps pointing back to Brighton. That's where Helens husband Thomas, was born. Thomas had 2 sisters (as well as 2 half sisters from his mothers first marriage) and one of his sisters married their mothers, 1st husbands, brothers, son. That family lived in Brighton. Their mother was born just outside Brighton and married there and had 2 girls. Thomas's father moved from Lancashire to Brighton to work on the railway. Met Ruth now a widow, they moved to Kilburn where he was the pattern maker with Saxby & Farmer signal makers and died of smallpox in May 1871. So Ruth obviously took her 2 daughters from her 1st marriage back to Brighton to see their grandparents and cousins etc, and obviously taken the 4 children from her second marriage. As you can see it is all very complicated, and the plot thickens because where her 1st husband had lived, there was in 1881 a Helen Wilson living there. She has been disproved as have the others in the area. Then to make matters worse, when we get to the 1911 census, Helen is living on her own. Her husband is in a convalescence home in Bognor Regis. Their daughter Edith is with an aunt in south London and their son (My Grandfather) is in Maidenhead, Berkshire. It took me ages to find him because he is shown as Alfred LOUSDALE. (his name is Thomas Alfred) He was living with George CRIPPS and his family. George CRIPPS was a Railway Clerk on the Gt Western, and Thomas later worked as pantry boy on the Exeter Tea Car that left Paddington at 4pm every day. (He went on to work the Royal Train for the tour of Crown Prince Hirohito in 1921 and died in 1925 aged 25) Mrs Eleanor Cripps was Eleanor Caroline BUNCE and she married George CRIPPS at Kensington in December 1885 volume 1a page 315. Eleanor BUNCE was christened 23 JUN 1861at St Andrew'S Church, Hertford daughter of John and Eliza. In 1871 she lived with her widowed mother Eliza at 3 Percy Rd, Willesden RG10 piece 1329 folio 56 page 41 along with sisters Jane 6, Emily 5 months and brother Charles aged 4. BUT in 1881 she was a servant in Brighton. Back to Brighton again. In 1901 George CRIPPS and Eleanor C were living at 6 Clarmont Road, Willesden, Middlesex - RG13; Piece: 1220; Folio: 53; Page: 38 That's the address where Thomas Alfred was born in March 1900. So as you can see this line has many twists and turns in it. So what are her roots, was she born in Yarmouth? Was she born in Peebles? Or was she really a PEEBLES? Or did she come from Brighton? So after more than 15 years of searching, I am no nearer finding Helen Elizabeth WILSON. And I maybe never will, but I'll keep looking. Thank you again Regards Michael PS. All these twists and turns would make a great story line in one or the period dramas like Downton Abbey, wouldn't it. Michael On 23-Sep-12 8:11 PM, [email protected] wrote: > From: [email protected] > >> From: Mike Fry <[email protected]> >> >>> On 2012/09/22 17:05, Michael wrote: >>> >>>> I'm having great trouble trying to pin down my Gt Granny who >>> according to the 1901 census was born Yarmouth, Suffolk in 1872 >>> and according to the 1911 census Yarmouth, Norfolk in 1873. >>>> >>>> According to her marriage certificate of February 1899, >>>> Kilburn, Middlesex. She was the daughter of John WILSON a deceased >>> fisherman. >>> >>> Sounds as though she was illegitimate in which case, she was >>> probably registered under her mother's name. No Helen Elizabeth's that I can see for >>> that period. >>> Plenty of Ellen Elizabeth's though :-)> >> >> I wouldn't always put too much credence on a named father on a >> marriage certificate. >> >> In my experience people who were born illegitimate often "invented" >> a father on a marriage certificate to avoid embarrassment if they didn't wish to tell their >> intended or the vicar! >> >> I have seen a number of certificates where I knew for a fact that >> the father of one of the parties was an invention.> > > I presume the gt-grandmother of Michael, the OP, was Hellen [sic] Elizabeth Wilson who > married Thomas Barlow Lonsdale at Kilburn Holy Trinity on 19 Feb 1899 (Ancestry's London > Parish Registers)? In the 1901 census she is indeed shown as being born at Yarmouth, > Suffolk, Thomas B Lonsdale was born 1868 at Brighton and they had a son of one, born > 1900 at Willesden. > > Like Mike in South Africa, I think Hellen (or whatever her name was) was born illegitimate > and, as I said, she probably invented a father on her marriage certificate. FreeBMD has no > Helen Elizabeth Wilson born at Yarmouth in 1872 or thereabouts, which of course is not to > say conclusively that her father wasn't John Wilson, fisherman! > > > -- > Roy Stockdill > Genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer > Famous family trees blog: http://blog.findmypast.co.uk/tag/roy-stockdill/ > > "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, > and that is not being talked about." > OSCAR WILDE > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Dans un e-mail daté du 26/09/2012 08:56:53 W. Europe Daylight Time, [email protected] a écrit : I could really do with the 1921 census. Roll on 2022, that's if they release it. Hello Michael, As I understand it the 1921 census will never be released, there is an Act of Parliament preventing the release of any of its information. Has anyone heard anything to the contrary? Regards, Mick.

Anyone researching the ORFORD / STEVENSON names from Ipswich 1880 to present. Love to hear from you Bob

Dear Listers, Any one had any experience of a confusion of James being recorded as John or vis versa please? Thanks Anne Gentleman, Nelson NZ

Hello everyone, could i please ask if someone could do a 1901 census lookup for Annie Ellen STEVENSON b: 1876 Bildestone. She may be living with her mother Caroline in the census. In the 1911 census Annie would likely be with her husband William Thomas W ORFORD i believe in Ipswich. If found could you please send me the image. Thank you for the help. Bob

Hi Ken, This Robert Everson married Margaret Flick in 1726 at Thorndon, so unfortunately this can't be mine. Dang it!! LOL Thank you for taking the time to look and help me. Hugs, Paula On 25 September 2012 17:59, <[email protected]> wrote: > Paula, > Could this be your man? > > parents: Robert Everson,&#8203; Mary > name: Robert Everson > gender: Male > baptism/christening date: 28 Sep 1704 > baptism/christening place: THORNDON,SUFFOLK,ENGLAND > birth date: 28 Sep 1704 > father's name: Robert Everson > mother's name: Mary > indexing project (batch) number: P01300-1 > system origin: England-ODM > source film number: Q942.64 T4 V26T > > Best, > Ken > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:57:07 +1000 > From: Paula Hadgraft <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [SFK-UK] My Brickwall - Robert Everson b. c1705 > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]om> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi all, > > Thanks to Bob Stephenson, I now have the baptisms of Robert Everson's > missing children, who were baptised at Creeting St. Mary as follows: > > 07 Apr 1728 Robert Everston, son of Robert > 26 Apr 1730 Sarah Everston, son of Robert > 25 Jun 1732 Mary Everston, dau pf Robert > > Bob, suggested checking Elmsett for Robert snr's baptism, however I do > have a transcript of baptisms between 1700-1900 and there are no > baptisms at all in Elmsett for any Everson's during this time, only > the three burials of him, his daughter Elizabeth in 1727 and his 2nd > wife Mary Barber in 1754. > > Do you guys think it is worth me trying to check earlier than 1700 in > Elmsett for a baptism for Robert Everson, bearing in mind that he > first married in 1726? > > I did notice while looking through the Suffolk Burial Index that there > are several burials at Hitcham around 1700-1705 and burial at > Bildeston. There are also a lot at Combs as well. I had a look back > through my records and realised that the search that I had done at > Combs was only for Robert's children Robert & Sarah, not for Robert > himself. > > Does anyone have the parish registers for Combs and if so would you > mind checking for a baptism for Robert Everson abt 1700? > > Any help that any of you can offer would be wonderful. > > Thanks and take care, > > Paula Hadgraft > Melbourne, Australia > > On 24 September 2012 19:07, Paula Hadgraft <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have been trying to track down my 7th great grandfather for about 20 >> years now with no luck, so I am wondering if anyone can help or offer >> any suggestions to help me find him. >> >> I am looking for: >> >> ROBERT EVERSON b. abt 1700-1705. Could also be spelt as Eversden, >> Everston, Evison etc. >> >> He married SARAH GOUDE/GOODE in Bramford on 11 Oct 1726, stating he >> was from Barham, however there is no baptism for him there. He has one >> daughter who is buried in Elmsett in 1727 (Source: SBI) and then I >> have a gap until 1733, where he then baptises 5 children in Somersham. >> >> The baptisms for the 2 children that I can't find during this time are: >> >> ROBERT EVERSON b. abt 1728 (he married Ann Tricker at Stowmarket in 1749) >> SARAH EVERSON b. abt 1731 (shemarried Jeremiah Garwood at Aldham in 1757) >> >> Robert was buried in Elmsett on 20 Apr 1748. His 1st wife Sarah was >> buried in Somersham in 1742. His 2nd wife Mary Barber was buried in >> Elmsett in 1754, Source: Suffolk Burial Index >> >> I've so far checked the following parishes for a baptism for Robert >> Everson and his 2 children: Aldham, Barham, Barking, Battisford, >> Belstead, Bentley, Bramford, Brantham, Burstall, Capel St. Mary, >> Chattisham, Chelmondiston, Claydon, Combs, Copdock, Creeting St. Mary, >> Earl Stonham, East Bergholt, Elmsett, Erwarton, Great Blakenham, Great >> Wenham, Harkstead, Hintlesham, Holbrook, Ipswich St. Clement, Ipswich >> St. Margaret, Ipswich St. Matthew, Ipswich St. Peter. Ipswich St. >> Stephen, Kersey, Little Blakenham, Little Wenham, Needham Market, >> Offton, Shotley, Somersham, Sproughton, Stutton, Whatfield, Wherstead, >> Washbrook and came up with nothing. >> >> If anyone on the list has any PR's from around this area that isn't on >> the list of searched parishes would you please help by checking them >> for me, even if it is to just cross more places off of my list. >> >> Thank you and hugs, >> >> Paula > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Apart from having two sons myself, one James, one John and sometimes confusing everyone by calling them either, not really sorry Anne. Janine :) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anne & Des Gentleman Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2012 6:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [SFK-UK] James for John? Dear Listers, Any one had any experience of a confusion of James being recorded as John or vis versa please? Thanks Anne Gentleman, Nelson NZ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5290 - Release Date: 09/24/12

Hi all, Thanks to Bob Stephenson, I now have the baptisms of Robert Everson's missing children, who were baptised at Creeting St. Mary as follows: 07 Apr 1728 Robert Everston, son of Robert 26 Apr 1730 Sarah Everston, son of Robert 25 Jun 1732 Mary Everston, dau pf Robert Bob, suggested checking Elmsett for Robert snr's baptism, however I do have a transcript of baptisms between 1700-1900 and there are no baptisms at all in Elmsett for any Everson's during this time, only the three burials of him, his daughter Elizabeth in 1727 and his 2nd wife Mary Barber in 1754. Do you guys think it is worth me trying to check earlier than 1700 in Elmsett for a baptism for Robert Everson, bearing in mind that he first married in 1726? I did notice while looking through the Suffolk Burial Index that there are several burials at Hitcham around 1700-1705 and burial at Bildeston. There are also a lot at Combs as well. I had a look back through my records and realised that the search that I had done at Combs was only for Robert's children Robert & Sarah, not for Robert himself. Does anyone have the parish registers for Combs and if so would you mind checking for a baptism for Robert Everson abt 1700? Any help that any of you can offer would be wonderful. Thanks and take care, Paula Hadgraft Melbourne, Australia On 24 September 2012 19:07, Paula Hadgraft <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been trying to track down my 7th great grandfather for about 20 > years now with no luck, so I am wondering if anyone can help or offer > any suggestions to help me find him. > > I am looking for: > > ROBERT EVERSON b. abt 1700-1705. Could also be spelt as Eversden, > Everston, Evison etc. > > He married SARAH GOUDE/GOODE in Bramford on 11 Oct 1726, stating he > was from Barham, however there is no baptism for him there. He has one > daughter who is buried in Elmsett in 1727 (Source: SBI) and then I > have a gap until 1733, where he then baptises 5 children in Somersham. > > The baptisms for the 2 children that I can't find during this time are: > > ROBERT EVERSON b. abt 1728 (he married Ann Tricker at Stowmarket in 1749) > SARAH EVERSON b. abt 1731 (shemarried Jeremiah Garwood at Aldham in 1757) > > Robert was buried in Elmsett on 20 Apr 1748. His 1st wife Sarah was > buried in Somersham in 1742. His 2nd wife Mary Barber was buried in > Elmsett in 1754, Source: Suffolk Burial Index > > I've so far checked the following parishes for a baptism for Robert > Everson and his 2 children: Aldham, Barham, Barking, Battisford, > Belstead, Bentley, Bramford, Brantham, Burstall, Capel St. Mary, > Chattisham, Chelmondiston, Claydon, Combs, Copdock, Creeting St. Mary, > Earl Stonham, East Bergholt, Elmsett, Erwarton, Great Blakenham, Great > Wenham, Harkstead, Hintlesham, Holbrook, Ipswich St. Clement, Ipswich > St. Margaret, Ipswich St. Matthew, Ipswich St. Peter. Ipswich St. > Stephen, Kersey, Little Blakenham, Little Wenham, Needham Market, > Offton, Shotley, Somersham, Sproughton, Stutton, Whatfield, Wherstead, > Washbrook and came up with nothing. > > If anyone on the list has any PR's from around this area that isn't on > the list of searched parishes would you please help by checking them > for me, even if it is to just cross more places off of my list. > > Thank you and hugs, > > Paula