Hi, Sandy: I am sending to you a copy of a note I sent to Mary Ann last week. Please note my inadvertent error in the second paragraph of my cover letter in the package of HUNT/WOOD copies. I'm sorry that I did not see your message giving your number at the hotel in New Haven in time to call you. Thanks, Cousin Meg (note below) ============ Subject: Re: HUNT Authorities Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 14:04:43 -0400 From: Megan Scott <[email protected]> Organization: @Home Network To: MRS MARY ANN C STEWART <[email protected]> Mary Ann: Hope Sandy was able to visit you. I had an email from him from New Haven, but I had not been able to access my mail (and see the message from him) until after he had left there. I discovered a BAD typo in my cover letter with the copies. 2nd paragraph, "I found Ann HUNT, b. 1640/41....." Because I had been concentrating so hard on the given name "Ann" I entered that when It really is "Hanna". By entering the wrong name, I totally destroyed my evaluation of the HUNT/WOOD connection!! In the Boston records portion of the Concord VRs: Hanna the daught - (superscript - r) of Wm hunt was borne the 9(superscript - o ?) (11 [superscript - o ?]) 1640. I am not experienced in dating. Would that be perhaps Feb. 9, 1641? or 9th day, 11th month 1640/41? Savage says Feb. 12, 1641, perhaps baptismal date? Does Wyman in the William of Concord line give better information? Thanks very much. Everytime I start to box up the HUNT/WOOD material, someone, somewhere posts another query about it! Any possible material in Wyman regarding a Mary HUNT, married John GRANT circa 1650? Thank you, Meg Scott