RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. [STEVENS] Edwin Samuel Stephens and Mary Stephens
    2. Brenda J Scott
    3. ORPER OF PUBLICATION. NO. 10610 EQinTy. In tbe Circuit Court for Frederick County, la Equity. Cacria M. Garrison, et al., TB, Edwin Samuel Stephana, ct al. The object of ttitc bill Is to procure • Decree for the sale of certain real estate In New Market, Frederick Coun£ ty, Md.. of lahlch Mary Stepheps. died, BeUed and prasessed. Tha bill «tAtes th»( Mary Stephen* was in her lifetime seized a&d pongees* a in fee slmi'Ic of a certain lot of ground iltuate. lying- an4 be I UK In New Market. Frederick Countr. Maryland, which she acquired l»y virtue of * peed from Nancy Stephens dated July Sth, 18TO, and recorded in Llbor C. M., No. S, Folio 481, one of the Land Records of Frederick County, and also br the rifirbt of mere thjin jo years' unlnterrupted possession, and that the said Mary Stephens departed (his life on th,- 9th day of .Tune, 1914, Intestau, leavin*; eurvlvlDjr her the followlqat heirs at law:—^Carrie M. Garrison and Henry T. Garrison, her husband; Edwin Samuel Stephens and Julia Ste* phens, his wife; John Wiiuai/i Stephens And Susan Stephens, hla wife; Harvey fj Stephens and Elizabeth A. Stephens, hjs wire; the sa(cj Carrie M, Garrison, ftdwln Samuel Stephens, John William Stephens, and Harvey it Stephens being children of Nathan Stephens, « deceased brother ot Mary Stephens; A. Margaret Jones and Samuel S. Stephens and Eleanor Stephens, his wife, and Charles E, Stephens, the said A. Margaret Jones, Skniucl S. Stephens and Charles E. Stephens, being: children ot David Stephens, a deceased brother pf the said Mary Stephens, all of Whom are known to the Complainants in this cause, and certain possible heirs at law who arc the children of Samuel Stephens, Jr., and Charles Stephens, both of whom died in Call|*rnia, the heirs of Whom are unknown to th* Complainants, if any there be, all the said hairs at law being npn-r«sitlents of the State of. Maryland with the eft* ccption of John William Stephens ana SUK.ITI Stephens, his wire. / That the property therein mentioned is not eusceptfMe of division without loss and injury to the parties thereunto entitled, and that in order to make a division of said interests, ana for the general benefit and advantago of all parties concerned, it is necessary that tbe property be sold and tha proceeds thereof divided among the several parties according to their respective interests. The Bill prays for the following relief:— 1. That decrees may be passed by the Court fpr the sale ot the said reej estate. 2. That the proceeds of said*aU may be distributed amon^r the parties hereto according t<r their re&pectlie right* and interests. IT IS THEREUPON tM« «tti day ot September, in <the year 1922, ORDERED by the Circuit Omr£ for Frederick County, in Equity, that the Planttffs by causing a, copy of this Order- to be inserted In some newspaper published in Frederick County at least once In each of four successive week* before the Sth day of October, A. D., 1922, gtvin* notice to the saUl Defendants, giving the object and substance of thla bill, "ordering then to appear in this Court in person or by solicitor on or before the 21st day of-October, A. D.. 1922. and show cause, if any they have, why a decree should not be passed as prayed. EM O. HAUGH, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Frederick County. C. McC. Mathlas and L- N. Coblents, Solicitors. Filed September «th, 1921. True Copy—Test: ELI G. Clerk. _________________________________________________________________ Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare! http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews

    10/10/2007 02:46:01