Very well stated, Phyllis. I TOTALLY agree. Richard White ALGenWeb SC Quoting Phyllis Rippee <wchs@getgoin.net>: > What this does is give me an idea. All I have to do is find another CC > in > MO who wants to tie up the system. We can propose one bylaws > amendment > after the other and keep MO holding votes on whether or not to pass them > on > to the AB. And, if the SC will cooperate, he can request the EC to > conduct > each such election to insure fairness. > > Now, if we can get two people, in each XXGenWeb Project to partner up, > we > can pretty well eliminate any other business any XXGenWeb Project might > wish > to conduct and drive the EC nutz! > > And, we cannot be declared not in good standing because we will be > following > the bylaws (if this is passed)., and there is no provision for a > judgement > of "frivolous" to be declared, except by the CCs of XXGenWeb Project. > Who > knows, maybe after wearing down the CCs to the point where they ignore > any > further proposals, the two of us would be the only ones voting in the > XXGenWeb on the issue. Of course, we would be voted down on the > national > level, but wouldn't it be a lot of fun to present the general > membership > with an amendment requiring the NC to wear purple shorts with pink > polka-dots during his/her term in office.? > > It looks to me like this is just one more reason (of many so far) to > vote > against the revised set of bylaws, when they are presented to the > membership. > > Phyllis Rippee > SW/SC CC Representative >