I agree. And who is *WE*? With all due respect, to allow the NC and the AB to be the "WE" would be akin to letting the fox guard the henhouse. I note with interest that, if we had done this in Georgia, the NC would have been up in arms about it. Richard ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Phyllis Rippee" <wchs@getgoin.net> To: STATE-COORD-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:54:56 -0500 Subject: [STATE-COORD] Soliciting Funds > "We just need to be dilligent to review each situation on its own > merit in order to protect the project." > > And, I respectfully ask....who is "we"? > > You know as well as I do that if 1500 members of this Project > protested what FOIAGW is doing, it wouldn't make one bit of > difference because that is what they are going to do. > > I maintain that if it is all right for some people to organize a non- > profit group that will "accept" contributions for whatever reason to > "further enable" (support) the placing of FREE access material on > line, then it should be okay for any CC to "find" a non-profit group > that will "accept" contributions to "further enable" the CC to place > FREE access material on line. > > Phyllis ------- End of Original Message -------