Ah, Yes! Apply the "ol' double standard." It's okay for one, but not for another. Phyllis ----- Original Message ----- From: Angie Rayfield <angie@inmyattic.com> To: <STATE-COORD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: 21 August, 2003 12:22 PM Subject: RE: [STATE-COORD] Soliciting Funds > No, but it would certainly be acceptable to thank them for their support > and provide a link to their site. And that's all that actually appears > on the IAGenWeb pages. > > Angie > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >Based on the theory behind Friends of IAGenWeb, would it be > >acceptable for > >me to place a statement soliciting funds for WCH&GS on all of my pages, > >except the main one which serves as an index to the others? > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003 > > > >

Double standard? What in the world are you talking about? Where are you seeing a double standard? Angie >-----Original Message----- >From: Phyllis Rippee [mailto:wchs@getgoin.net] >Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:12 PM >To: STATE-COORD-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Soliciting Funds > > >Ah, Yes! Apply the "ol' double standard." It's okay for one, >but not for >another. > >Phyllis >----- Original Message ----- > > >> No, but it would certainly be acceptable to thank them for >their support >> and provide a link to their site. And that's all that >actually appears >> on the IAGenWeb pages. >> >> Angie >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> > >> >Based on the theory behind Friends of IAGenWeb, would it be >> >acceptable for >> >me to place a statement soliciting funds for WCH&GS on all >of my pages, >> >except the main one which serves as an index to the others? >> > >> >> --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003

According to your reply to my question, it's okay for FOIAGW, but the WCH&GS can't follow their example. Phyllis ----- Original Message ----- From: Angie Rayfield <angie@inmyattic.com> To: <STATE-COORD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: 21 August, 2003 4:02 PM Subject: RE: [STATE-COORD] Soliciting Funds > Double standard? What in the world are you talking about? Where are > you seeing a double standard? > > Angie > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Phyllis Rippee [mailto:wchs@getgoin.net] > >Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:12 PM > >To: STATE-COORD-L@rootsweb.com > >Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Soliciting Funds > > > > > >Ah, Yes! Apply the "ol' double standard." It's okay for one, > >but not for > >another. > > > >Phyllis > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > > >> No, but it would certainly be acceptable to thank them for > >their support > >> and provide a link to their site. And that's all that > >actually appears > >> on the IAGenWeb pages. > >> > >> Angie > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> > > >> >Based on the theory behind Friends of IAGenWeb, would it be > >> >acceptable for > >> >me to place a statement soliciting funds for WCH&GS on all > >of my pages, > >> >except the main one which serves as an index to the others? > >> > > >> > >> > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003 > > > >

I said no such thing, and I have no idea where you're getting such an idea, because in fact, I said quite the opposite. I've been looking at IAGenWeb pages, and on the ones that even mention FOIAGW, I've seen a "thank you" to FOIAGW, and link to the FOIAGW page. Which is the exact same thing that I said would be acceptable on your page -- thank WCH&GS for their support and link to their page. Angie >-----Original Message----- > > >According to your reply to my question, it's okay for FOIAGW, >but the WCH&GS >can't follow their example. > >Phyllis >----- Original Message ----- > > >> Double standard? What in the world are you talking about? Where are >> you seeing a double standard? >> >> Angie >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> > >> > >> >Ah, Yes! Apply the "ol' double standard." It's okay for one, >> >but not for >> >another. >> > >> >Phyllis >> >----- Original Message ----- >> > >> > >> >> No, but it would certainly be acceptable to thank them for >> >their support >> >> and provide a link to their site. And that's all that >> >actually appears >> >> on the IAGenWeb pages. >> >> >> >> Angie >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> > >> >> >Based on the theory behind Friends of IAGenWeb, would it be >> >> >acceptable for >> >> >me to place a statement soliciting funds for WCH&GS on all >> >of my pages, >> >> >except the main one which serves as an index to the others? >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >> Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003 >> >> >> >> > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003 > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003