Whether you agree or disagree with the proposed revisions, there's hardly anything "hidden" going on. Every proposed revision is being posted to the project lists for discussion. There are BRC members on these same lists, so it's not as though the committee members are working in a vacuum and will somehow have no idea what questions have been raised. These are first drafts, so there can, and probably will be, additional revisions to address the issues. And, of course, the revisions will be subject to a vote by the membership before anything becomes part of the bylaws, so anyone who disagrees with the final result will certainly have the opportunity to make their opinions heard. Hidden? Maybe I'm being overly sensitive, but your choice of words makes it sound as though there's some sort of giant cosmic conspiracy going on. Angie >-----Original Message----- > > >No Joy according to this revision, given the right set of >circumstances it >would only take 6 vote for removal of any SC or ASC. Makes >one wonder what >other little jewels are hidden in this set of revisions? Richard... > >Joy Fisher wrote: >> It would take 51 votes against the SC to recall. >> >> It is not a majority of those voting, but a majority >> of the CCs. >> > > Richard M. Howland > Mailto:RichPump@wf.net > ICQ # 898319 > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003 > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003