On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Roger Swafford wrote: > David the amended Section 2 reads ..... > > Section 2. Local Project Coordinators shall be appointed by the State > Coordinator in accordance with national and state bylaws, rules and > policies. In making Local Coordinator appointments, consideration should be > given to knowledge and interest in genealogy in the area, technical ability, > and existing workload. Local Project Coordinators are authorized to nominate > one Local Project Co-Coordinator and as many Assistant Coordinators as > desired for appointment by the State Coordinator. State Coordinators may > reject nominees only for valid cause. Local Projects are limited to one > Local Project Coordinator and one Local Project Co-Coordinator, if desired, > who will each have full voting rights within The USGenWeb Project. Assistant > Local Project Coordinators shall not have national voting rights. All Local > Coordinators shall be subscribed to the state mailing list. > > I would suggest that counties with more than 1 CC and 1 Co-CC to consider > developing city or town sites within the county to qualify for full voting > rights. > > Roger I don't see the need for that. They already have voting rights as long as the bylaws are not changed. David David W. Morgan dmorgan@efn.org Honolulu Hawaii SC - TXGenWeb http://www.rootsweb.com/~txgenweb/ ** http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~dmorgan/