Sorry, that should be "taken". g On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Gail Kilgore <gail.kilgore@gmail.com> wrote: > That could be a tricky question. If I am reading right the special > project is within a state and not a national special project. The state > approved the special project and the project would belong to the state. I > could assume that the lead may have been the person who started or > maintains the SP so in order to take the SP down or change it, it would > have to be a topic for the whole state and the state would need to vote on > the status of the project and shouldn't be removed until a vote to > decommission is take. > > Gail > AZ & CO > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Tina Vickery <tsvickery@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am curious tonight, and want opinions. If you have a limited scope >> period of history highlighted within your XXGenWeb Project as a >> approved Special Project would you “decommission” that project and >> fold it into an all-encompassing History Project, dismissing a project >> lead without discussion or notice with that lead? >> >> Tina >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > > -- > When the door of happiness closes, another opens, but often times we look > so long at the closed door that we don't see the one which has been opened > for us. > > *Trails to the Past* > *http://trailstothepast.org* <http://trailstothepast.org> > > -- When the door of happiness closes, another opens, but often times we look so long at the closed door that we don't see the one which has been opened for us. *Trails to the Past* *http://trailstothepast.org* <http://trailstothepast.org>