This is *all* the EC should be doing. Vivian Price Saffold State Coordinator The GAGenWeb Project At 12:46 PM 10/11/2009, you wrote: >The EC rules in this report >ii. The EC will send any unverifiable names to the regional AB member(s) and >to the SC. >and >(1) All names and e-mail addresses used for registering will be screened for >possible discrepancies. >f. Any discrepancy not able to be resolved between the voter and the EC, >unless the discrepancy is possible fraudulent registration, shall be >directed to the appropriate local leadership or appointed contact person >within the voter's state or special project, for resolution. > >Where is the EC allowed to dismiss anyone without first allowing >local SC, etc. to handle it first? > >--Ann >SC VTGenWeb > >-------------- Original message from "Sherri" ><[email protected]>: -------------- > > > > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2009-01/1232156087 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan Cortez > > Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 9:12 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] The bylaw rule does exist > > > > Would some one be kind enough to lead me to the motion by the AB that > > authorized the EC not to register CC's that did not display the approved > > logo. Some how, I managed to miss that. > > > > Thanks, > > > > jic > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "MAK - Transcriber" > > > > > > > One of the real problems is the struggle for power. > > > > > Having been on the EC during the time we were "directed" by AB not to > > > register CCs who did not display the approved logo - this was discussed > > > extensively - not all of us had the same philosophy - so I can > only speak > > > for myself - while not having a logo is an administrative thing > - it is my > > > > > understanding that the SC is the final authority of whether or not an > > > individual was an official CC within the state - by putting the > EC in the > > > position of being the "logo police", IMHO, the EC was assigned > > > responsibilities outside of the scope of their position, having the > > > unfortunate affect of usurping the SCs authority. This was very > > > frustrating from all points of view - and needs to be > thoroughly discussed > > > > > before the next election. Personally, I strongly feel this IS the SC's > > > job - and, they should be allowed to do their jobs without outside > > > interference - unless they ask for help. > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes > > in the subject and the body of the message > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without >the quotes in the subject and the body of the message