Since we already a requirement for display of the USGW logo, what is the purpose of the current discussion? I am concerned that this might be leading up to authorizing either the Advisory Board or the Elections Committee to disqualify coordinators who display an incorrect logo (or display a correct logo in an unsatisfactory manner) from either voting or membership. Vivian Price Saffold State Coordinator The GAGenWeb Project At 05:20 PM 10/10/2009, you wrote: >Am I to understand that at the moment there is not a requirement that we use >one of those logos? Or is it just that the requirement is often ignored? >Just a clarification question. > >On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Tina S. Vickery <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This agenda item is now under discussion on AB-CHAT > > by the Advisory Board and is shared here with > > permission. I would be very interested in input > > from Project members as the Board addresses this item. > > > > I look forward to your input. > > > > Tina Vickery > > Representative at Large > > [email protected] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sherri" <[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 7:06 PM > > Subject: [ABChat] Next Agenda Items > > > > > > > The next two items on the agenda both deal with the CC Guidelines > > document > > > so I'm going to put them together for discussion as I was the one > > > responsible for adding them to the agenda. > > > > > > Item #1 - Discussion of the requirement that the USGenWeb logo on Project > > > sites be one of the approved logos posted at > > > http://usgenweb.org/volunteers/logos.shtml. > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without >the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
To repeat myself, some pretty stupid things have happened in the past in the name of enforcing rules. On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Michael and Vivian Saffold < [email protected]> wrote: > Since we already a requirement for display of the USGW logo, what is > the purpose of the current discussion? > > I am concerned that this might be leading up to authorizing either > the Advisory Board or the Elections Committee to disqualify > coordinators who display an incorrect logo (or display a correct logo > in an unsatisfactory manner) from either voting or membership. > > Vivian Price Saffold > State Coordinator > The GAGenWeb Project > > > At 05:20 PM 10/10/2009, you wrote: > >Am I to understand that at the moment there is not a requirement that we > use > >one of those logos? Or is it just that the requirement is often ignored? > >Just a clarification question. > > > >On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Tina S. Vickery <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > This agenda item is now under discussion on AB-CHAT > > > by the Advisory Board and is shared here with > > > permission. I would be very interested in input > > > from Project members as the Board addresses this item. > > > > > > I look forward to your input. > > > > > > Tina Vickery > > > Representative at Large > > > [email protected] > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Sherri" <[email protected]> > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 7:06 PM > > > Subject: [ABChat] Next Agenda Items > > > > > > > > > > The next two items on the agenda both deal with the CC Guidelines > > > document > > > > so I'm going to put them together for discussion as I was the one > > > > responsible for adding them to the agenda. > > > > > > > > Item #1 - Discussion of the requirement that the USGenWeb logo on > Project > > > > sites be one of the approved logos posted at > > > > http://usgenweb.org/volunteers/logos.shtml. > > > > > > >------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > >the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael and Vivian Saffold" <[email protected]> > I am concerned that this might be leading up to authorizing either > the Advisory Board or the Elections Committee to disqualify > coordinators who display an incorrect logo (or display a correct logo > in an unsatisfactory manner) from either voting or membership. I believe that this is happening and has been in the last few elections already. The EC has the final say on whether a person is qualified to vote, not the SC. Jan