Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [STATE-COORD] Fw: [ABChat] Next Agenda Items
    2. Harold Kilmer
    3. Exactly (In my opinion.) Therefore the two weeks is not the problem here.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Harold Kilmer, NMGenWeb SC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sherri" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 4:19 PM Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Fw: [ABChat] Next Agenda Items >I don't mean to pick a fight, either, but - > > Why would a State Coordinator that KNOWS a coordinator is displaying an > incorrect/unapproved logo not take the initiative to make sure the > coordinator updates the logo to one of the approved logos so that the > issue > doesn't come up in the first place? > > Article XII, Section 6 states: " It shall be the responsibility of each > state project to periodically review local-level project websites to > ensure > compliance with The USGenWeb Project/XXGenWeb Project established > guidelines/standards." > > It's the State Project's responsibility, so how can you blame it on either > the AB or the EC if a coordinator whose sites don't meet the guidelines is > not eligible to vote? The SC and/or ASC and/or the individual coordinator > is contacted if there are issues with the sites meeting the established > guidelines - at least once, so it's not like it's happening in a vacuum, > and > there's plenty of time to get the problems fixed before the election. > There > were issues with one or more Project sites in at least half of the > XXGenWeb > State Projects before this last election. The individual site > coordinators > and the State Coordinators were contacted by one of three AB members > personally - at least once, often twice or more, and sometimes by more > than > one of us. <g> > > Sherri > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael and Vivian > Saffold > Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 5:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Fw: [ABChat] Next Agenda Items > > Since we already a requirement for display of the USGW logo, what is > the purpose of the current discussion? > > I am concerned that this might be leading up to authorizing either > the Advisory Board or the Elections Committee to disqualify > coordinators who display an incorrect logo (or display a correct logo > in an unsatisfactory manner) from either voting or membership. > > Vivian Price Saffold > State Coordinator > The GAGenWeb Project > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    10/10/2009 10:42:55